Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYE vs AIOT vs TRAK vs WKHS vs BLNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Software - Application
Auto - Manufacturers
Engineering & Construction
FLYE vs AIOT vs TRAK vs WKHS vs BLNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Auto - Manufacturers | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $3M | $463M | $185M | $32M | $91M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $436M | $24M | $11M | $106M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-32M | $7M | $-64M | $-126M |
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | 55.2% | 85.0% | -236.8% | 26.0% |
| Operating Margin | -38.1% | 1.7% | 30.2% | -5.6% | -119.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 27.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $19M | $287M | $510K | $16M | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $840K | $49M | $29M | $4M | $42M |
FLYE vs AIOT vs TRAK vs WKHS vs BLNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fly-E Group, Inc. C… (FLYE) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 74.4 | -25.6% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 66.4 | -33.6% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 18.5 | -81.5% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 28.9 | -71.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYE vs AIOT vs TRAK vs WKHS vs BLNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.70, yield 22.2%
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5%
- 22.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRAK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
TRAK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 14.5% 10Y total return vs AIOT's -28.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- Beta 1.15, yield 0.9%, current ratio 6.09x
- 30.9% margin vs WKHS's -6.1%
WKHS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +236.1% vs FLYE's -95.3%
Among these 5 stocks, BLNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs WKHS's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs BLNK's 2.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 22.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRAK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +236.1% vs FLYE's -95.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 21.4% vs -109.7% |
FLYE vs AIOT vs TRAK vs WKHS vs BLNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLYE vs AIOT vs TRAK vs WKHS vs BLNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRAK leads in 3 of 6 categories
FLYE leads 1 • AIOT leads 1 • WKHS leads 0 • BLNK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $436M annually — 41.0x WKHS's $11M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WKHS's -6.1%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $436M | $24M | $11M | $106M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$302,514 | $69M | $8M | -$52M | -$115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$32M | $7M | -$64M | -$126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $3M | $7M | -$33M | -$47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +55.2% | +85.0% | -2.4% | +26.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -38.1% | +1.7% | +30.2% | -5.6% | -119.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.1% | -7.4% | +30.9% | -6.1% | -118.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | +0.6% | +29.1% | -3.1% | -44.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.3% | +47.4% | +6.7% | -5.0% | +11.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.6% | -25.5% | +13.2% | +95.9% | +99.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FLYE leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FLYE's 17.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AIOT's 44.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $463M | $185M | $32M | $91M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $701M | $157M | $44M | $60M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | -7.91x | 29.01x | -0.07x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 27.82x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.85x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.52x | 44.16x | 20.98x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 1.28x | 8.18x | 4.83x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 0.91x | 3.93x | 0.16x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.01x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-198 for WKHS. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLYE's 1.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.1% | -6.6% | +14.6% | -198.1% | -131.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.0% | -3.4% | +12.9% | -60.6% | -66.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | -4.3% | +21.4% | -77.6% | -109.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.6% | -5.1% | +12.9% | -107.9% | -77.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.94x | 0.64x | 0.01x | 0.37x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $238M | -$28M | $12M | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $840,102 | $49M | $29M | $4M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $287M | $509,973 | $16M | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.87x | 0.47x | 165.50x | -3.84x | -9064.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRAK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $21,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15 for WKHS. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +236.1% total return vs FLYE's -95.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRAK at 17.7% vs FLYE's -84.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.8% | -35.2% | -14.1% | -34.7% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.3% | -32.7% | -52.5% | +236.1% | +4.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -28.7% | +63.0% | -98.6% | -88.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -28.7% | +110.3% | -99.8% | -97.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -28.7% | +14.5% | -99.8% | -97.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.1% | -10.7% | +17.7% | -75.9% | -51.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIOT and TRAK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRAK is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AIOT currently trades 56.0% from its 52-week high vs FLYE's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 2.70x | 1.15x | 1.46x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $161.80 | $6.07 | $23.72 | $11.80 | $2.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.68 | $2.77 | $6.94 | $0.53 | $0.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +56.0% | +42.8% | +30.8% | +29.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 52.2 | 63.8 | 72.7 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 1.6M | 161K | 167K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
AIOT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIOT as "Buy", TRAK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 136.3% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 135.3% for AIOT (target: $8). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 22.15% vs TRAK's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $24.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +22.2% | +0.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 | $0.09 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +1.7% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
TRAK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLYE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FLYE vs AIOT vs TRAK vs WKHS vs BLNK: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYE or AIOT or TRAK or WKHS or BLNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) offers the better valuation at 29. 0x trailing P/E (27. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLYE or AIOT or TRAK or WKHS or BLNK?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRAK returned +14. 5% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLYE or AIOT or TRAK or WKHS or BLNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately 156% more volatile than TRAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 194% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FLYE or AIOT or TRAK or WKHS or BLNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Workhorse Group Inc. grew EPS 65. 4% year-over-year, compared to -379. 1% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLYE or AIOT or TRAK or WKHS or BLNK?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -1538. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus -1116. 7% for WKHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FLYE or AIOT or TRAK or WKHS or BLNK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 136.
3% to $24. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — FLYE or AIOT or TRAK or WKHS or BLNK?
In this comparison, AIOT (22.
2% yield), TRAK (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FLYE, WKHS, BLNK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FLYE or AIOT or TRAK or WKHS or BLNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 0. 9% yield). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRAK: +14. 5%, BLNK: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FLYE and AIOT and TRAK and WKHS and BLNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (FLYE (Consumer Cyclical) and AIOT (Technology) and TRAK (Technology) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FLYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT, TRAK pay a dividend while FLYE, WKHS, BLNK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.