Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYE vs UBER vs LYFT vs WKHS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Auto - Manufacturers
FLYE vs UBER vs LYFT vs WKHS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Software - Application | Software - Application | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $3M | $162.94B | $5.70B | $36M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $53.69B | $6.32B | $11M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $8.54B | $2.84B | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | 41.0% | 41.5% | -236.8% |
| Operating Margin | -38.1% | 11.7% | -3.0% | -5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.5x | 23.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $19M | $13.47B | $1.35B | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $840K | $7.74B | $1.84B | $4M |
FLYE vs UBER vs LYFT vs WKHS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fly-E Group, Inc. C… (FLYE) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 108.9 | +8.9% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 100.9 | +0.9% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 20.7 | -79.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYE vs UBER vs LYFT vs WKHS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
UBER carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.09
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 3.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
- 90.4% 10Y total return vs LYFT's -81.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
LYFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 45.0% margin vs WKHS's -6.1%
- 31.5% ROA vs WKHS's -60.6%, ROIC -7.1% vs -77.6%
WKHS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +284.0% vs FLYE's -95.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs WKHS's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs FLYE's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +284.0% vs FLYE's -95.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 31.5% ROA vs WKHS's -60.6%, ROIC -7.1% vs -77.6% |
FLYE vs UBER vs LYFT vs WKHS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLYE vs UBER vs LYFT vs WKHS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UBER leads in 3 of 6 categories
FLYE leads 1 • LYFT leads 1 • WKHS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 5055.1x WKHS's $11M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WKHS's -6.1%. On growth, UBER holds the edge at +14.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $53.7B | $6.3B | $11M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$302,514 | $7.0B | -$57M | -$52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $8.5B | $2.8B | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $9.8B | $1.1B | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +41.0% | +41.5% | -2.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -38.1% | +11.7% | -3.0% | -5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.1% | +15.9% | +45.0% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | +18.3% | +18.2% | -3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.3% | +14.5% | +2.7% | -5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.6% | -84.3% | -100.0% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FLYE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 88% valuation discount to UBER's 16.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLYE's 17.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UBER's 26.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $162.9B | $5.7B | $36M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $168.7B | $5.2B | $48M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | 16.74x | 2.09x | -0.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.50x | 23.87x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.52x | 26.72x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 3.13x | 0.90x | 5.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 5.98x | 1.82x | 0.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.69x | 5.11x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 86.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-198 for WKHS. WKHS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLYE's 1.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.1% | +32.1% | +86.9% | -198.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.0% | +14.2% | +31.5% | -60.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | +13.6% | -7.1% | -77.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.6% | +12.5% | -6.2% | -107.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.94x | 0.48x | 0.41x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $5.7B | -$1.6B | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $840,102 | $7.7B | $1.8B | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $13.5B | $1.4B | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.87x | 20.93x | 80.43x | -3.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UBER leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $16,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17 for WKHS. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +284.0% total return vs FLYE's -95.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 26.8% vs FLYE's -84.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.8% | -4.5% | -28.1% | -26.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.2% | -7.8% | +10.4% | +284.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +103.9% | +66.6% | -98.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +69.7% | -71.4% | -99.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +90.4% | -81.8% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.1% | +26.8% | +18.6% | -75.0% |
Risk & Volatility
UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 77.6% from its 52-week high vs FLYE's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.09x | 1.29x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $161.80 | $101.99 | $25.54 | $11.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.68 | $68.46 | $12.31 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +77.6% | +55.7% | +34.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 44.7 | 50.0 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 15.8M | 15.1M | 161K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UBER as "Buy", LYFT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.0% upside for LYFT (target: $19) vs 32.5% for UBER (target: $105).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $104.88 | $19.21 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 61 | 59 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | +8.8% | +0.5% |
UBER leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FLYE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FLYE vs UBER vs LYFT vs WKHS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (23. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS?
On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Uber Technologies, Inc. at 16. 7x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS?
Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) delivered a total return of +69. 7%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +90. 4% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock's 1. 63β — meaning FLYE is approximately 50% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 194% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -379. 1% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, UBER leads at 17. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS?
Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -1538. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -1116. 7% for WKHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LYFT leads at 41. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) trades at 23. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 9x for Lyft, Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYFT: 35. 0% to $19. 21.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FLYE or UBER or LYFT or WKHS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09)). Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock (FLYE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBER: +90. 4%, FLYE: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLYE and UBER and LYFT and WKHS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FLYE (Consumer Cyclical) and UBER (Technology) and LYFT (Technology) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FLYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.