Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FMAO vs MVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FMAO vs MVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $380M | $339M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $270M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 62.3% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $300M | $77M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $244M |
FMAO vs MVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers & Merchants… (FMAO) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 185.8 | +85.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMAO vs MVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMAO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 3.2%
- 144.5% 10Y total return vs MVBF's 135.5%
- Beta 1.04, yield 3.2%, current ratio 13.43x
MVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 0.09x
- NIM 3.2% vs FMAO's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs FMAO's 7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs FMAO's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs MVBF's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs FMAO's +15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6% |
FMAO vs MVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FMAO vs MVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVBF and FMAO operate at a comparable scale, with $270M and $189M in trailing revenue. FMAO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVBF's 10.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $270M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.3% | +71.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, FMAO trades at a 37% valuation discount to MVBF's 12.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MVBF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FMAO's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $380M | $339M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $583M | $172M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.11x | 12.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.81x | 15.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | 4.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.99x | 160.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MVBF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FMAO delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for MVBF. MVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMAO's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FMAO scores 8/9 vs MVBF's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $202M | -$167M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $300M | $77M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FMAO and MVBF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FMAO five years ago would be worth $14,428 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,234 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, MVBF leads with a +53.4% total return vs FMAO's +15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVBF at 18.2% vs FMAO's 15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.7% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.0% | +53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.8% | +65.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.5% | +135.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FMAO and MVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MVBF is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMAO's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FMAO currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs MVBF's 89.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.79 | $29.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.59 | $17.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 34K |
Analyst Outlook
FMAO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FMAO as "Hold" and MVBF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for MVBF (target: $30) vs 3.0% for FMAO (target: $29). For income investors, FMAO offers the higher dividend yield at 3.20% vs MVBF's 2.52%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.0% |
FMAO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MVBF leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FMAO vs MVBF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMAO or MVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO). Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMAO or MVBF?
On trailing P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus MVB Financial Corp. at 12. 8x. On forward P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMAO or MVBF?
Over the past 5 years, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) delivered a total return of +44. 3%, compared to -27. 7% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FMAO returned +144. 5% versus MVBF's +135. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMAO or MVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning FMAO is approximately 24% more volatile than MVBF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 81% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMAO or MVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 7. 1% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 34. 6% for MVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMAO or MVBF?
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FMAO leads at 22. 5% versus 13. 6% for MVBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MVBF leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMAO or MVBF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for MVB Financial Corp. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVBF: 13. 7% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMAO or MVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 5% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF).
09Is FMAO or MVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 2. 5% yield, +135. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MVBF: +135. 5%, FMAO: +144. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMAO and MVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMAO is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.