Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FMAO vs MVBF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FMAO
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$380M
5Y Perf.+27.3%
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$339M
5Y Perf.+85.8%

FMAO vs MVBF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FMAO logoFMAO
MVBF logoMVBF
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$380M$339M
Revenue (TTM)$189M$270M
Net Income (TTM)$33M$27M
Gross Margin62.3%71.7%
Operating Margin22.5%13.6%
Forward P/E9.8x15.2x
Total Debt$300M$77M
Cash & Equiv.$98M$244M

FMAO vs MVBFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FMAO
MVBF
StockMay 20May 26Return
Farmers & Merchants… (FMAO)100127.3+27.3%
MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF)100185.8+85.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FMAO vs MVBF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FMAO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. MVB Financial Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FMAO
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FMAO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 3.2%
  • 144.5% 10Y total return vs MVBF's 135.5%
  • Beta 1.04, yield 3.2%, current ratio 13.43x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

MVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 0.09x
  • NIM 3.2% vs FMAO's 3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMVBF logoMVBF19.0% NII/revenue growth vs FMAO's 7.1%
ValueFMAO logoFMAOLower P/E (9.8x vs 15.2x)
Quality / MarginsFMAO logoFMAOEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyMVBF logoMVBFBeta 0.84 vs FMAO's 1.04, lower leverage
DividendsFMAO logoFMAO3.2% yield, vs MVBF's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)MVBF logoMVBF+53.4% vs FMAO's +15.0%
Efficiency (ROA)FMAO logoFMAOEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6%

FMAO vs MVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FMAOFarmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Service, Other
77.9%$5M
Bank Servicing
22.1%$1M
MVBFMVB Financial Corp.
FY 2019
Product And Services, Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
41.4%$1M
Product And Services, Consulting Income
27.1%$921,000
Product And Services, Debit Card And Interchange Income
16.8%$571,000
Product And Services, Other
14.7%$499,000

FMAO vs MVBF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFMAOLAGGINGMVBF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

MVBF and FMAO operate at a comparable scale, with $270M and $189M in trailing revenue. FMAO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVBF's 10.0%.

MetricFMAO logoFMAOFarmers & Merchan…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$189M$270M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$48M$39M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M$27M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$36M$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.3%+71.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.5%+13.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.6%+10.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.3%+0.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.4%-55.6%
FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, FMAO trades at a 37% valuation discount to MVBF's 12.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MVBF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FMAO's 13.7x.

MetricFMAO logoFMAOFarmers & Merchan…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…
Market CapShares × price$380M$339M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$583M$172M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.11x12.81x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.81x15.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.60x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.70x4.67x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.01x1.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.02x1.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.99x160.42x
FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MVBF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FMAO delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for MVBF. MVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMAO's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FMAO scores 8/9 vs MVBF's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFMAO logoFMAOFarmers & Merchan…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.3%+8.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.9%+7.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.1%+8.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.81x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$202M-$167M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$98M$244M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$300M$77M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.61x0.54x
MVBF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FMAO and MVBF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FMAO five years ago would be worth $14,428 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,234 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, MVBF leads with a +53.4% total return vs FMAO's +15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVBF at 18.2% vs FMAO's 15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFMAO logoFMAOFarmers & Merchan…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.7%+4.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.0%+53.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.8%+65.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.3%-27.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+144.5%+135.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.2%+18.2%
Evenly matched — FMAO and MVBF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FMAO and MVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MVBF is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMAO's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FMAO currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs MVBF's 89.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFMAO logoFMAOFarmers & Merchan…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.04x0.84x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.79$29.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.59$17.13
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.9%+89.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.850.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded54K34K
Evenly matched — FMAO and MVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FMAO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates FMAO as "Hold" and MVBF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for MVBF (target: $30) vs 3.0% for FMAO (target: $29). For income investors, FMAO offers the higher dividend yield at 3.20% vs MVBF's 2.52%.

MetricFMAO logoFMAOFarmers & Merchan…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.50$30.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts27
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.88$0.66
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+3.0%
FMAO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FMAO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MVBF leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallFarmers & Merchants Bancorp… (FMAO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FMAO vs MVBF: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FMAO or MVBF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.

(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO). Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FMAO or MVBF?

On trailing P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.

(FMAO) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus MVB Financial Corp. at 12. 8x. On forward P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FMAO or MVBF?

Over the past 5 years, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.

(FMAO) delivered a total return of +44. 3%, compared to -27. 7% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FMAO returned +144. 5% versus MVBF's +135. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FMAO or MVBF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MVB Financial Corp.

(MVBF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning FMAO is approximately 24% more volatile than MVBF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 81% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FMAO or MVBF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.

(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 7. 1% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 34. 6% for MVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FMAO or MVBF?

Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.

(FMAO) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FMAO leads at 22. 5% versus 13. 6% for MVBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MVBF leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FMAO or MVBF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.

(FMAO) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for MVB Financial Corp. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVBF: 13. 7% to $30. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FMAO or MVBF?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 5% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF).

09

Is FMAO or MVBF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MVB Financial Corp.

(MVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 2. 5% yield, +135. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MVBF: +135. 5%, FMAO: +144. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FMAO and MVBF?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FMAO is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FMAO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MVBF

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FMAO and MVBF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FMAO: 7.1% · MVBF: 19.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(FMAO: 17.6% · MVBF: 10.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FMAO: 8.1x · MVBF: 12.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.