Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FMNB vs LARK vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FMNB
Farmers National Banc Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$557M
5Y Perf.+20.7%
LARK
Landmark Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$171M
5Y Perf.+43.0%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.+186.8%
SBCF
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.03B
5Y Perf.+42.7%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-66.0%

FMNB vs LARK vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FMNB logoFMNB
LARK logoLARK
CZWI logoCZWI
SBCF logoSBCF
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$557M$171M$203M$3.03B$24.47B
Revenue (TTM)$272M$96M$90M$870M$10.89B
Net Income (TTM)$55M$19M$14M$145M$382M
Gross Margin63.8%71.2%54.7%61.6%38.1%
Operating Margin23.9%24.0%7.0%21.4%17.5%
Forward P/E9.4x9.1x11.8x12.4x7.5x
Total Debt$368M$34M$52M$1.34B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$20M$21M$119M$181M$599M

FMNB vs LARK vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FMNB
LARK
CZWI
SBCF
FIS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Farmers National Ba… (FMNB)100120.7+20.7%
Landmark Bancorp, I… (LARK)100143.0+43.0%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100286.8+186.8%
Seacoast Banking Co… (SBCF)100142.7+42.7%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10034.0-66.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FMNB vs LARK vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LARK leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Farmers National Banc Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. CZWI and FIS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FMNB
Farmers National Banc Corp.
The Banking Pick

FMNB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.

  • 20.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
  • 4.8% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8%
Best for: quality and dividends
LARK
Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

LARK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 35.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 21.0%, current ratio 1.01x
  • Beta 0.45, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.01x
  • NIM 3.5% vs SBCF's 2.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 157.0% 10Y total return vs LARK's 116.1%
  • +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
SBCF
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, SBCF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
  • PEG 0.31 vs SBCF's 6.62
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLARK logoLARK8.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32
Quality / MarginsFMNB logoFMNB20.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Stability / SafetyLARK logoLARKBeta 0.45 vs SBCF's 1.19, lower leverage
DividendsFMNB logoFMNB4.8% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+45.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
Efficiency (ROA)LARK logoLARK1.2% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 8.3% vs 2.0%

FMNB vs LARK vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FMNBFarmers National Banc Corp.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
31.3%$11M
Credit and Debit Card
22.4%$8M
Deposit Account
20.4%$7M
Insurance Agency Commissions
18.5%$7M
Investment Commissions
7.4%$3M
LARKLandmark Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
SBCFSeacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
FY 2020
Mortgage Banking
46.5%$15M
Deposit Account
29.8%$9M
Wealth Management Income
23.7%$8M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

FMNB vs LARK vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLARKLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LARK and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. FMNB is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.

MetricFMNB logoFMNBFarmers National …LARK logoLARKLandmark Bancorp,…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…SBCF logoSBCFSeacoast Banking …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$272M$96M$90M$870M$10.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$70M$25M$9M$202M$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$55M$19M$14M$145M$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$45M$21M$11M$179M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.8%+71.2%+54.7%+61.6%+38.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.9%+24.0%+7.0%+21.4%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.1%+19.6%+16.0%+16.7%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.2%+21.9%+11.5%+20.6%+26.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.6%+35.1%+63.0%-27.5%+92.3%
Evenly matched — LARK and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LARK and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.1x trailing earnings, LARK trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FIS offers better value at 2.58x vs SBCF's 10.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFMNB logoFMNBFarmers National …LARK logoLARKLandmark Bancorp,…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…SBCF logoSBCFSeacoast Banking …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$557M$171M$203M$3.0B$24.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$905M$184M$136M$4.2B$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.78x9.13x14.44x19.65x63.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.39x11.78x12.41x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.85x10.49x2.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.91x7.96x15.28x22.45x7.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.05x1.78x2.25x3.49x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.10x1.07x1.09x0.93x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.68x8.13x19.55x16.95x9.97x
Evenly matched — LARK and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LARK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LARK delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. LARK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMNB's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LARK scores 8/9 vs SBCF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFMNB logoFMNBFarmers National …LARK logoLARKLandmark Bancorp,…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…SBCF logoSBCFSeacoast Banking …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.0%+12.4%+7.8%+5.8%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+1.2%+0.8%+0.8%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.9%+8.3%+2.0%+3.9%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.4%+3.1%+0.6%+3.7%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–978646
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.76x0.21x0.28x0.44x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$347M$13M-$67M$1.2B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$21M$119M$181M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$368M$34M$52M$1.3B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.71x0.91x0.16x0.66x4.64x
LARK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFMNB logoFMNBFarmers National …LARK logoLARKLandmark Bancorp,…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…SBCF logoSBCFSeacoast Banking …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.1%+8.7%+21.5%-1.2%-27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+12.7%-0.5%+45.6%+31.5%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.8%+69.8%+160.0%+67.4%-6.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.0%+61.2%+71.2%-10.7%-63.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+102.7%+116.1%+157.0%+121.9%-13.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.6%+19.3%+37.5%+18.7%-2.2%
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LARK and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LARK is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBCF's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZWI currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFMNB logoFMNBFarmers National …LARK logoLARKLandmark Bancorp,…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…SBCF logoSBCFSeacoast Banking …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.45x0.46x1.19x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.50$30.80$22.62$35.55$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.13$23.43$12.83$23.48$43.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.5%+91.0%+93.2%+87.3%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.358.063.748.743.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded402K7K40K741K5.5M
Evenly matched — LARK and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FMNB and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FMNB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", SBCF as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -1.3% for FMNB (target: $14). For income investors, FMNB offers the higher dividend yield at 4.77% vs CZWI's 1.76%.

MetricFMNB logoFMNBFarmers National …LARK logoLARKLandmark Bancorp,…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…SBCF logoSBCFSeacoast Banking …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$32.50$67.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts721637
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.8%+2.8%+1.8%+2.4%+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00761
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.68$0.79$0.37$0.74$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.1%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — FMNB and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LARK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallLandmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FMNB vs LARK vs CZWI vs SBCF vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Landmark Bancorp, Inc.

(LARK) is the stronger pick with 8. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Landmark Bancorp, Inc.

(LARK) is the cheapest at 9. 1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Landmark Bancorp, Inc.

(LARK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 1. 19β — meaning SBCF is approximately 166% more volatile than LARK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (LARK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 76% for Farmers National Banc Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Landmark Bancorp, Inc.

(LARK) is pulling ahead at 8. 3% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Landmark Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 35. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?

Farmers National Banc Corp.

(FMNB) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LARK leads at 24. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LARK leads at 71. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Farmers National Banc Corp. (FMNB) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is FMNB or LARK or CZWI or SBCF or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, SBCF: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FMNB and LARK and CZWI and SBCF and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (FMNB (Financial Services) and LARK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and SBCF (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FMNB is a small-cap deep-value stock; LARK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FMNB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LARK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZWI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBCF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FMNB and LARK and CZWI and SBCF and FIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FMNB: 0.9% · LARK: 8.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(FMNB: 20.1% · LARK: 19.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FMNB: 9.8x · LARK: 9.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.