Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FMS vs DVA vs FXNC vs NKTR vs BAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Banks - Regional
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
FMS vs DVA vs FXNC vs NKTR vs BAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Banks - Regional | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $11.92B | $12.60B | $253M | $1.69B | $9.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.36B | $13.84B | $112M | $55M | $11.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $947M | $781M | $18M | $-164M | $-1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | 31.1% | 74.0% | 99.6% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 15.0% | 19.6% | -237.9% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 13.8x | 11.7x | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $10.79B | $15.05B | $43M | $149M | $10.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.60B | $758M | $161M | $15M | $1.97B |
FMS vs DVA vs FXNC vs NKTR vs BAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 100 | 51.3 | -48.7% |
| DaVita Inc. (DVA) | 100 | 242.4 | +142.4% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| Baxter Internationa… (BAX) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMS vs DVA vs FXNC vs NKTR vs BAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 3.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 75.6%, current ratio 1.26x
DVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.67 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.05 vs NKTR's 1.85
- 4.5% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 10.5% vs -57.2%
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs DVA's 158.1%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
- 15.8% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +8.2% vs BAX's -41.8%
BAX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.37, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.31x
- 3.9% yield, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs NKTR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs BAX's -41.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 10.5% vs -57.2% |
FMS vs DVA vs FXNC vs NKTR vs BAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FMS vs DVA vs FXNC vs NKTR vs BAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FXNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
FMS leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • DVA leads 1 • BAX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.4B annually — 350.5x NKTR's $55M. FXNC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, DVA holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.4B | $13.8B | $112M | $55M | $11.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $2.8B | $25M | -$130M | $671M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $947M | $781M | $18M | -$164M | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $1.5B | $21M | -$209M | $501M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +31.1% | +74.0% | +99.6% | +30.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +15.0% | +19.6% | -2.4% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +5.6% | +15.8% | -3.0% | -9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +10.8% | +18.7% | -3.8% | +4.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.5% | +6.0% | — | -25.3% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.4% | +43.5% | +7.1% | -4.5% | -112.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FMS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, FMS trades at a 47% valuation discount to DVA's 20.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FMS offers better value at 2.15x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.9B | $12.6B | $253M | $1.7B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.7B | $26.9B | $134M | $1.8B | $17.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.96x | 20.64x | 14.27x | -8.57x | -10.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.52x | 13.85x | 11.75x | — | 9.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.15x | 2.49x | 9.55x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.91x | 9.87x | 6.13x | — | 25.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 0.92x | 2.25x | 30.64x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 14.93x | 1.35x | 15.66x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.98x | 9.61x | 12.03x | — | 27.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DVA and FXNC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DVA delivers a 59.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DVA's 12.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FMS scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +59.1% | +10.0% | -4.0% | -16.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +4.5% | +0.9% | -62.8% | -5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +10.5% | +7.7% | -57.2% | -1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +14.0% | +9.9% | -55.7% | -1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 12.99x | 0.23x | 1.66x | 1.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.2B | $14.3B | -$118M | $134M | $8.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $758M | $161M | $15M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.8B | $15.0B | $43M | $149M | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.17x | 3.54x | 0.84x | -4.74x | -0.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FXNC five years ago would be worth $16,866 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,566 for BAX. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs BAX's -41.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs BAX's -24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.9% | +71.4% | +14.6% | +92.0% | -10.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.5% | +36.3% | +46.9% | +818.2% | -41.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.2% | +120.0% | +110.8% | +621.8% | -56.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.9% | +54.8% | +68.7% | -72.3% | -74.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.1% | +158.1% | +241.1% | -59.1% | -42.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | +30.1% | +28.2% | +93.3% | -24.1% |
Risk & Volatility
DVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DVA currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs BAX's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.05x | 0.70x | 1.85x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.46 | $197.08 | $29.85 | $109.00 | $32.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.02 | $101.00 | $18.31 | $7.99 | $15.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.1% | +99.6% | +93.7% | +76.5% | +53.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.5 | 82.2 | 47.6 | 53.4 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 527K | 801K | 80K | 991K | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FXNC and BAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FMS as "Hold", DVA as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", BAX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 59.3% upside for NKTR (target: $133) vs -24.9% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, BAX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.87% vs FXNC's 2.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $168.67 | $21.00 | $132.83 | $19.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 23 | 1 | 33 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | — | +2.2% | — | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 | 11 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.70 | — | $0.61 | — | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +14.2% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FXNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FMS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FMS vs DVA vs FXNC vs NKTR vs BAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX?
On trailing P/E, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.
KGaA (FMS) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus DaVita Inc. at 20. 6x. On forward P/E, Baxter International Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: DaVita Inc. wins at 1. 67x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX?
Over the past 5 years, First National Corporation (FXNC) delivered a total return of +68.
7%, compared to -74. 3% for Baxter International Inc. (BAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus NKTR's -59. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DaVita Inc.
(DVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 3799% more volatile than DVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 13% for DaVita Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -37. 8% for Baxter International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DVA leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX?
First National Corporation (FXNC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FXNC leads at 19. 6% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, DaVita Inc. (DVA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 67x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Baxter International Inc. (BAX) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for DaVita Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTR: 59. 3% to $132. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX?
In this comparison, BAX (3.
9% yield), FMS (3. 8% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DVA, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FMS or DVA or FXNC or NKTR or BAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DaVita Inc.
(DVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), +158. 1% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DVA: +158. 1%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMS and DVA and FXNC and NKTR and BAX?
These companies operate in different sectors (FMS (Healthcare) and DVA (Healthcare) and FXNC (Financial Services) and NKTR (Healthcare) and BAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FMS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DVA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BAX is a small-cap income-oriented stock. FMS, FXNC, BAX pay a dividend while DVA, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.