Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FN vs BHE vs FLEX vs JBL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
FN vs BHE vs FLEX vs JBL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $24.33B | $3.11B | $49.54B | $40.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.24B | $2.70B | $26.84B | $32.67B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $418M | $34M | $852M | $809M |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 10.1% | 9.1% | 9.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 4.1% | 4.9% | 4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 49.9x | 31.3x | 41.5x | 30.2x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $408M | $4.15B | $3.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $306M | $322M | $2.29B | $1.93B |
FN vs BHE vs FLEX vs JBL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabrinet (FN) | 100 | 1062.1 | +962.1% |
| Benchmark Electroni… (BHE) | 100 | 408.7 | +308.7% |
| Flex Ltd. (FLEX) | 100 | 1387.5 | +1287.5% |
| Jabil Inc. (JBL) | 100 | 1244.5 | +1144.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FN vs BHE vs FLEX vs JBL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 13.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.8%
- 18.7% 10Y total return vs JBL's 21.0%
- 18.6% revenue growth vs FLEX's -2.3%
- 9.9% margin vs BHE's 1.3%
BHE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, Low D/E 37.1%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 1.70, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 1.70 vs FN's 2.74
FLEX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +266.4% vs JBL's +148.0%
JBL is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.40 vs BHE's 2.54
- Lower P/E (30.2x vs 41.5x), PEG 0.40 vs 0.63
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FLEX's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.2x vs 41.5x), PEG 0.40 vs 0.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs BHE's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs FN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JBL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +266.4% vs JBL's +148.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.3% ROA vs BHE's 1.7%, ROIC 16.1% vs 6.7% |
FN vs BHE vs FLEX vs JBL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FN vs BHE vs FLEX vs JBL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FN leads in 2 of 6 categories
JBL leads 1 • BHE leads 0 • FLEX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBL is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.7B annually — 12.1x BHE's $2.7B. FN is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BHE's 1.3%. On growth, FN holds the edge at +39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $2.7B | $26.8B | $32.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $432M | $157M | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $418M | $34M | $852M | $809M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $87M | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +10.1% | +9.1% | +9.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +4.1% | +4.9% | +4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +1.3% | +3.2% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +3.2% | +4.3% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.3% | +7.2% | +7.7% | +23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.0% | +2.6% | -4.5% | +96.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JBL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 62.9x trailing earnings, JBL trades at a 51% valuation discount to BHE's 127.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JBL offers better value at 0.83x vs BHE's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.3B | $3.1B | $49.5B | $40.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.0B | $3.2B | $51.4B | $41.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 74.06x | 127.35x | 63.85x | 62.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.87x | 31.35x | 41.50x | 30.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.97x | 10.32x | 0.97x | 0.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 63.60x | 20.98x | 30.09x | 22.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.12x | 1.17x | 1.92x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.43x | 2.86x | 10.72x | 27.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 117.79x | 36.37x | 46.43x | 34.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FN and JBL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBL delivers a 58.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $3 for BHE. FN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBL's 2.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BHE scores 5/9 vs FN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.6% | +3.1% | +16.8% | +58.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.3% | +1.7% | +4.4% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +6.7% | +13.0% | +30.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.1% | +7.2% | +12.8% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.37x | 0.83x | 2.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$297M | $86M | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $306M | $322M | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $408M | $4.1B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.00x | 6.38x | 4.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FN five years ago would be worth $78,753 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29,497 for BHE. Over the past 12 months, FLEX leads with a +266.4% total return vs JBL's +148.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FN at 93.7% vs BHE's 62.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.6% | +97.7% | +111.6% | +54.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +231.5% | +153.5% | +266.4% | +148.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +626.4% | +325.2% | +546.8% | +376.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +687.5% | +195.0% | +639.1% | +608.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1868.9% | +369.3% | +1010.7% | +2103.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +93.7% | +62.0% | +86.3% | +68.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BHE and JBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BHE is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JBL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FN's 92.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.74x | 1.70x | 2.03x | 1.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $733.00 | $87.73 | $134.99 | $372.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $193.54 | $33.69 | $34.94 | $146.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +98.7% | +99.8% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.0 | 82.0 | 77.3 | 67.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 697K | 373K | 3.7M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FN and BHE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FN as "Buy", BHE as "Hold", FLEX as "Buy", JBL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -0.7% upside for BHE (target: $86) vs -40.6% for FLEX (target: $80). BHE is the only dividend payer here at 0.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $614.50 | $86.00 | $80.00 | $273.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 9 | 25 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.67 | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.9% | +2.5% | +2.5% |
FN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). JBL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FN vs BHE vs FLEX vs JBL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fabrinet (FN) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for Flex Ltd. (FLEX). Jabil Inc. (JBL) offers the better valuation at 62. 9x trailing P/E (30. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fabrinet (FN) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL?
On trailing P/E, Jabil Inc.
(JBL) is the cheapest at 62. 9x versus Benchmark Electronics, Inc. at 127. 4x. On forward P/E, Jabil Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Jabil Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Benchmark Electronics, Inc. 's 2. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL?
Over the past 5 years, Fabrinet (FN) delivered a total return of +687.
5%, compared to +195. 0% for Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (BHE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JBL returned +21. 0% versus BHE's +369. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
(BHE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Fabrinet's 2. 74β — meaning FN is approximately 62% more volatile than BHE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fabrinet (FN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Jabil Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fabrinet (FN) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus -2. 3% for Flex Ltd. (FLEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fabrinet grew EPS 13. 2% year-over-year, compared to -60. 5% for Benchmark Electronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FN leads at 14. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL?
Fabrinet (FN) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
7% net margin versus 0. 9% for Benchmark Electronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FN leads at 9. 5% versus 4. 0% for BHE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FN leads at 12. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Jabil Inc. (JBL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Benchmark Electronics, Inc. 's 2. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Jabil Inc. (JBL) trades at 30. 2x forward P/E versus 49. 9x for Fabrinet — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BHE: -0. 7% to $86. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL?
In this comparison, BHE (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FN, FLEX, JBL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FN or BHE or FLEX or JBL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
(BHE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +369. 3% 10Y return). Jabil Inc. (JBL) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BHE: +369. 3%, JBL: +21. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FN and BHE and FLEX and JBL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BHE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLEX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JBL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BHE pays a dividend while FN, FLEX, JBL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.