FNB vs WSFS

For growth investors, F.

N. B. Corporation (FNB) is the stronger pick with 4. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, F.

N. B. Corporation (FNB) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus WSFS Financial Corporation at 14. 2x. On forward P/E, F. N. B. Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 67x versus F. N. B. Corporation's 0. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, F.

N. B. Corporation (FNB) delivered a total return of +52. 3%, compared to +43. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSFS returned +128. 7% versus FNB's +80. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

89β versus F. N. B. Corporation's 1. 22β — meaning FNB is approximately 37% more volatile than WSFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 58% for F. N. B. Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), F.

N. B. Corporation (FNB) is pulling ahead at 4. 9% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: F. N. B. Corporation grew EPS 22. 8% year-over-year, compared to 15. 4% for WSFS Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

1% net margin versus 21. 0% for F. N. B. Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus 24. 8% for FNB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus F. N. B. Corporation's 0. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for WSFS Financial Corporation — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNB: 12. 7% to $20. 50.

In this comparison, WSFS (0.

9% yield) pays a dividend. FNB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

89), 0. 9% yield, +128. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WSFS: +128. 7%, FNB: +80. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

WSFS pays a dividend while FNB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.