Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FNWD vs HFBL vs CZWI vs TRST vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FNWD vs HFBL vs CZWI vs TRST vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $147M | $60M | $207M | $979M | $2.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $101M | $33M | $90M | $278M | $902M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $5M | $14M | $61M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 65.6% | 66.7% | 54.7% | 67.1% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 20.0% | 7.0% | 29.2% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 15.4x | 11.8x | 19.3x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $85M | $4M | $52M | $193M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $16M | $119M | $51M | $185M |
FNWD vs HFBL vs CZWI vs TRST vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finward Bancorp (FNWD) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 156.5 | +56.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FNWD vs HFBL vs CZWI vs TRST vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FNWD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HFBL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 7.2%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.37 vs NBTB's 0.76, lower leverage
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 149.0% 10Y total return vs TRST's 116.9%
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
TRST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FNWD's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- +77.1% vs NBTB's +18.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FNWD's 0.6%
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.64 vs TRST's 5.31
- NIM 3.1% vs TRST's 2.6%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.3x), PEG 1.64 vs 5.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FNWD's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs NBTB's 0.76, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.1% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FNWD's 0.6% |
FNWD vs HFBL vs CZWI vs TRST vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FNWD vs HFBL vs CZWI vs TRST vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
FNWD leads 0 • HFBL leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRST and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 27.2x HFBL's $33M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNWD's 8.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $101M | $33M | $90M | $278M | $902M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $8M | $9M | $90M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $5M | $14M | $61M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $8M | $11M | $46M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.6% | +66.7% | +54.7% | +67.1% | +73.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +20.0% | +7.0% | +29.2% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +15.7% | +16.0% | +22.0% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +22.9% | +12.4% | +16.4% | +24.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +63.6% | +63.0% | +44.1% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 20% valuation discount to FNWD's 18.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 2.06x vs TRST's 4.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $60M | $207M | $979M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $214M | $47M | $140M | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.08x | 15.40x | 14.70x | 17.00x | 14.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.75x | — | 11.79x | 19.25x | 11.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.63x | 2.90x | 4.69x | 2.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.34x | 7.88x | 15.69x | 12.49x | 11.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.46x | 1.84x | 2.29x | 3.52x | 2.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.09x | 1.11x | 1.47x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.25x | 10.99x | 19.90x | 21.39x | 11.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HFBL and NBTB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $5 for FNWD. HFBL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FNWD's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFBL scores 8/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +9.3% | +7.8% | +8.9% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.8% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +5.9% | +2.0% | +7.2% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +8.0% | +0.6% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.07x | 0.28x | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $66M | -$12M | -$67M | $142M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $16M | $119M | $51M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $85M | $4M | $52M | $193M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.23x | 0.61x | 0.16x | 0.90x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZWI and TRST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $17,200 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,462 for FNWD. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +77.1% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.2% | +10.5% | +24.3% | +35.7% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.7% | +46.0% | +52.1% | +77.1% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.0% | +55.1% | +153.7% | +97.0% | +48.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.4% | +26.8% | +69.0% | +72.0% | +44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.1% | +111.2% | +149.0% | +116.9% | +108.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | +15.8% | +36.4% | +25.4% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HFBL and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HFBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FNWD's 85.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 0.37x | 0.50x | 0.67x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.88 | $20.71 | $22.62 | $55.60 | $48.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.46 | $12.32 | $12.83 | $30.52 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +93.7% | +94.9% | +99.4% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 60.3 | 51.2 | 72.6 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 2K | 41K | 96K | 266K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FNWD as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.6% upside for FNWD (target: $41) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs FNWD's 1.07%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | — | — | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.7% | +1.7% | +2.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $0.53 | $0.37 | $1.51 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | +3.0% | +3.9% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Analyst Outlook. 4 categories are tied.
FNWD vs HFBL vs CZWI vs TRST vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Finward Bancorp (FNWD) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Finward Bancorp at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 64x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 31x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +72.
0%, compared to -15. 4% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +149. 0% versus FNWD's +49. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBTB is approximately 105% more volatile than HFBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 48% for Finward Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -33. 8% for Finward Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 8. 0% for Finward Bancorp — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 31x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNWD: 20. 6% to $41. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 1% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD).
09Is FNWD or HFBL or CZWI or TRST or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 2. 7% yield, +111. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HFBL: +111. 2%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FNWD and HFBL and CZWI and TRST and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FNWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HFBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.