FOR
Forestar Group Inc.
Real Estate - Development
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.+78.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FOR vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WELL
Welltower Inc.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$151.66B
5Y Perf.+327.2%
FOR vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FOR | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $151.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.71B | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $167M | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 21.3% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 79.7x |
| Total Debt | $817M | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $379M | $5.03B |
FOR vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FOR
WELL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) | 100 | 178.8 | +78.8% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 427.2 | +327.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOR vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WELL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Forestar Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FOR
Forestar Group Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
FOR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and efficiency.
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 79.7x)
- 5.3% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 7.8% vs 0.5%
Best for: value and efficiency
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 233.9% 10Y total return vs FOR's 114.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WELL | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs FOR's 10.1% |
| Value | FOR | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 79.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | WELL | 12.3% margin vs FOR's 9.8% |
| Stability / Safety | WELL | Beta 0.13 vs FOR's 1.14 |
| Dividends | WELL | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WELL | +45.8% vs FOR's +39.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FOR | 5.3% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 7.8% vs 0.5% |
FOR vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2025
FOR vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWELLLAGGINGFOR
FORForestar Group Inc.
2leads
WELLWelltower Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FORMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WELL5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FOR5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FOR7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WELL6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WELL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
WELL1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 6.8x FOR's $1.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.3% (WELL) to 9.8% (FOR). On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FORForestar Group In… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $213M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $167M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $266M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +22.5% |
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FOR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.2x trailing earnings, FOR trades at a 95% valuation discount to WELL's 155.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOR's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 67.4x.
| Metric | FORForestar Group In… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $151.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $168.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.24x | 155.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.17x | 79.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.55x | 67.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 14.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 3.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.25x |
FOR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOR delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. FOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WELL's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs FOR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FORForestar Group In… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $438M | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $379M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $817M | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.26x |
FOR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,193 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,813 for FOR. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +45.8% total return vs FOR's +39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 43.3% vs FOR's 11.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FORForestar Group In… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.5% | +16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.7% | +194.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | +211.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.7% | +233.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.0% | +43.3% |
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FOR's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs FOR's 88.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FORForestar Group In… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.74 | $219.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.50 | $142.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.2% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 133K | 2.6M |
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
WELL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FOR as "Buy" and WELL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.6% upside for FOR (target: $28) vs 4.6% for WELL (target: $227). WELL is the only dividend payer here at 1.28% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FORForestar Group In… | WELLWelltower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.38 | $226.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
WELL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
WELL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FOR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallWelltower Inc. (WELL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FOR vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOR or WELL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 2x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOR or WELL?
On trailing P/E, Forestar Group Inc.
(FOR) is the cheapest at 8. 2x versus Welltower Inc. at 155. 7x. On forward P/E, Forestar Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOR or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +211. 9%, compared to +8. 1% for Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +233. 9% versus FOR's +114. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOR or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Forestar Group Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning FOR is approximately 755% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 49% for Welltower Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOR or WELL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 10. 1% for Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Welltower Inc. grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -17. 8% for Forestar Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOR or WELL?
Forestar Group Inc.
(FOR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOR leads at 12. 6% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOR or WELL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Forestar Group Inc.
(FOR) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 79. 7x for Welltower Inc. — 70. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOR: 4. 6% to $28. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOR or WELL?
In this comparison, WELL (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. FOR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FOR or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +233. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +233. 9%, FOR: +114. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOR and WELL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FOR is a small-cap deep-value stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WELL pays a dividend while FOR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FOR: 6.6% · WELL: 40.3%)Net Margin>
%
(FOR: 9.8% · WELL: 12.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FOR: 8.2x · WELL: 155.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.