FOX vs NWSA vs WBD vs NYT

For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Fox Corporation (FOX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the cheapest at 11.

5x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fox Corporation wins at 0. 49x versus The New York Times Company's 0. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The New York Times Company (NYT) delivered a total return of +83.

0%, compared to -27. 2% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NYT returned +569. 7% versus WBD's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The New York Times Company (NYT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

34β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning WBD is approximately 153% more volatile than NYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The New York Times Company (NYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOX) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 18. 1% for The New York Times Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NYT leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

0% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOX leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus The New York Times Company's 0. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOX) trades at 12. 2x forward P/E versus 27. 9x for The New York Times Company — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOX: 50. 2% to $85. 00.

In this comparison, NWSA (1.

2% yield), FOX (1. 1% yield), NYT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. WBD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

34), 0. 8% yield, +569. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYT: +569. 7%, WBD: -3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FOX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NYT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. FOX, NWSA, NYT pay a dividend while WBD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.