Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FPAY vs UPBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
FPAY vs UPBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2K | $1.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $4.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $84M |
| Gross Margin | 97.6% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.5x |
| Total Debt | $163M | $1.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $121M |
FPAY vs UPBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FlexShopper, Inc. (FPAY) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FPAY vs UPBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FPAY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.5%, EPS growth 37.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- Lower volatility, beta -1.17, current ratio 7.10x
- Beta -1.17, current ratio 7.10x
UPBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 104.4% 10Y total return vs FPAY's -100.0%
- 1.8% margin vs FPAY's -1.0%
- Lower D/E ratio (266.9% vs 492.7%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.5% revenue growth vs UPBD's 8.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs FPAY's -1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (266.9% vs 492.7%) | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -11.8% vs FPAY's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs FPAY's -0.7%, ROIC 7.3% vs 10.5% |
FPAY vs UPBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FPAY vs UPBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FPAY and UPBD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 33.9x FPAY's $140M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.8% (UPBD) to -1.0% (FPAY). On growth, FPAY holds the edge at +17.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $84M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$43M | $349M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.6% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.5% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.3% | +3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -168.1% | +45.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FPAY leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FPAY's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UPBD's 10.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2,461 | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $153M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 15.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.72x | 10.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UPBD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPBD delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for FPAY. UPBD carries lower financial leverage with a 2.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FPAY's 4.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UPBD scores 4/9 vs FPAY's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.5% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.5% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.93x | 2.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $153M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $163M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.17x | 1.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UPBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UPBD five years ago would be worth $4,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for FPAY. Over the past 12 months, UPBD leads with a -11.8% total return vs FPAY's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPBD at -9.1% vs FPAY's -94.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -100.0% | -11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -25.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -55.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +104.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.8% | -9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FPAY and UPBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FPAY is the less volatile stock with a -1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPBD's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UPBD currently trades 67.8% from its 52-week high vs FPAY's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.17x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.47 | $28.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $15.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +67.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 23.4 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 845K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
UPBD is the only dividend payer here at 7.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% |
UPBD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FPAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FPAY vs UPBD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FPAY or UPBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FlexShopper, Inc.
(FPAY) is the stronger pick with 19. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 7% for Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD). Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (4. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FPAY or UPBD?
Over the past 5 years, Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) delivered a total return of -55. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for FlexShopper, Inc. (FPAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UPBD returned +104. 4% versus FPAY's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FPAY or UPBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FlexShopper, Inc.
(FPAY) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 17β versus Upbound Group, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning UPBD is approximately -262% more volatile than FPAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for FlexShopper, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FPAY or UPBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FlexShopper, Inc.
(FPAY) is pulling ahead at 19. 5% versus 8. 7% for Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FlexShopper, Inc. grew EPS 37. 1% year-over-year, compared to -43. 4% for Upbound Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FPAY leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FPAY or UPBD?
Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -0. 1% for FlexShopper, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FPAY leads at 16. 3% versus 4. 8% for UPBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FPAY leads at 97. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FPAY or UPBD?
In this comparison, UPBD (7.
9% yield) pays a dividend. FPAY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FPAY or UPBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FlexShopper, Inc.
(FPAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 17)). Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FPAY: -100. 0%, UPBD: +104. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FPAY and UPBD?
These companies operate in different sectors (FPAY (Industrials) and UPBD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FPAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPBD is a small-cap deep-value stock. UPBD pays a dividend while FPAY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.