Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRGE vs MKTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
FRGE vs MKTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $549M | $5.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93M | $817M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-63M | $220M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 68.9% |
| Operating Margin | -73.5% | 41.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.2x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $73M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $544M |
FRGE vs MKTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forge Global Holdin… (FRGE) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| MarketAxess Holding… (MKTX) | 100 | 34.5 | -65.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRGE vs MKTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRGE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 30.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 4.74x
- Beta 0.37, current ratio 4.74x
MKTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 37.2% 10Y total return vs FRGE's -70.9%
- 33.6% margin vs FRGE's -67.4%
- Lower D/E ratio (5.2% vs 6.4%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs MKTX's 8.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.6% margin vs FRGE's -67.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (5.2% vs 6.4%) | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +272.5% vs MKTX's -33.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs FRGE's -24.9%, ROIC 18.0% vs -45.6% |
FRGE vs MKTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FRGE vs MKTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKTX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $817M annually — 8.8x FRGE's $93M. MKTX is the more profitable business, keeping 33.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRGE's -67.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $93M | $817M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$64M | $429M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | $346M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +68.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -73.5% | +41.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -67.4% | +33.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -43.4% | +45.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.1% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FRGE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $549M | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $459M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.29x | 20.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.93x | 6.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.42x | 4.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MKTX leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKTX delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-29 for FRGE. MKTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRGE's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKTX scores 6/9 vs FRGE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.3% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.9% | +10.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -45.6% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.3% | +23.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$91M | -$472M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $544M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $73M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 443.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MKTX five years ago would be worth $3,723 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,015 for FRGE. Over the past 12 months, FRGE leads with a +272.5% total return vs MKTX's -33.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRGE at 26.3% vs MKTX's -19.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | -16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +272.5% | -33.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.3% | -47.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.8% | -62.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.9% | +37.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.3% | -19.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRGE and MKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTX is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRGE's 0.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRGE currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MKTX's 63.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | -0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.03 | $232.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.88 | $148.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +63.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.0 | 28.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 321K | 443K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FRGE as "Hold" and MKTX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for MKTX (target: $196) vs 0.0% for FRGE (target: $45). MKTX is the only dividend payer here at 2.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | $195.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
MKTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FRGE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FRGE vs MKTX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRGE or MKTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Forge Global Holdings, Inc.
(FRGE) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Forge Global Holdings, Inc. (FRGE) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FRGE or MKTX?
Over the past 5 years, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) delivered a total return of -62. 8%, compared to -69. 8% for Forge Global Holdings, Inc. (FRGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MKTX returned +37. 2% versus FRGE's -70. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FRGE or MKTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Forge Global Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 37β — meaning FRGE is approximately -230% more volatile than MKTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 6% for Forge Global Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FRGE or MKTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Forge Global Holdings, Inc.
(FRGE) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus 8. 6% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forge Global Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 30. 4% year-over-year, compared to 6. 3% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FRGE or MKTX?
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 6% net margin versus -83. 6% for Forge Global Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKTX leads at 41. 7% versus -103. 7% for FRGE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTX leads at 68. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FRGE or MKTX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKTX: 31.
4% to $195. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — FRGE or MKTX?
In this comparison, MKTX (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. FRGE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FRGE or MKTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTX: +37. 2%, FRGE: -70. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FRGE and MKTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (FRGE (Technology) and MKTX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
MKTX pays a dividend while FRGE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.