Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FRGT vs DCOM vs TPVG vs HUBG vs FWRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Asset Management
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
FRGT vs DCOM vs TPVG vs HUBG vs FWRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $170K | $1.64B | $243M | $2.61B | $547M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $730M | $97M | $3.73B | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $111M | $-12M | $105M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | 13.5% | 56.1% | 83.5% | 48.7% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | -39.8% | 21.5% | 77.9% | 3.8% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.7x | 6.5x | 26.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $371M | $469M | $509M | $2.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $204K | $2.35B | $20M | $98M | $106M |
FRGT vs DCOM vs TPVG vs HUBG vs FWRD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freight Technologie… (FRGT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) | 100 | 183.9 | +83.9% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRGT vs DCOM vs TPVG vs HUBG vs FWRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRGT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- PEG 1.68 vs HUBG's 21.49
- Better valuation composite
- 2.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
TPVG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- Beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- NIM 7.4% vs DCOM's 2.7%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs FRGT's -19.5%
HUBG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 122.3% 10Y total return vs DCOM's 68.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 30.1%, current ratio 1.33x
- 3.7% ROA vs FRGT's -43.8%, ROIC 5.1% vs -147.2%
Among these 5 stocks, FWRD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs FRGT's -19.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs FRGT's -40.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs FRGT's -86.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs FRGT's -43.8%, ROIC 5.1% vs -147.2% |
FRGT vs DCOM vs TPVG vs HUBG vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FRGT vs DCOM vs TPVG vs HUBG vs FWRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • FRGT leads 0 • HUBG leads 0 • FWRD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 281.1x FRGT's $13M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRGT's -40.3%. On growth, FRGT holds the edge at +30.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $730M | $97M | $3.7B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $161M | -$22M | $331M | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $111M | -$12M | $105M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $182M | $35M | $113M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +56.1% | +83.5% | +48.7% | +23.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -39.8% | +21.5% | +77.9% | +3.8% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.3% | +15.2% | +50.6% | +2.8% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.9% | +25.0% | -58.7% | +3.0% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | — | — | -5.3% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.5% | +2.3% | -2.3% | +20.5% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 81% valuation discount to HUBG's 25.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DCOM offers better value at 2.47x vs HUBG's 20.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $169,559 | $1.6B | $243M | $2.6B | $547M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | -$341M | $691M | $3.0B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | 15.73x | 4.91x | 25.30x | -4.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.72x | 6.50x | 26.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.47x | 4.84x | 20.74x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -2.18x | 9.13x | 9.06x | 13.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 2.25x | 2.50x | 0.66x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.09x | 0.68x | 1.55x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.00x | — | 18.15x | 35.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-85 for FRGT. DCOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs FRGT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -85.0% | +7.7% | -3.4% | +6.1% | -52.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.8% | +0.8% | -1.5% | +3.7% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -147.2% | +5.6% | +7.2% | +5.1% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +6.1% | +9.4% | +6.1% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 1.33x | 0.30x | 13.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$2.0B | $449M | $410M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $204,032 | $2.4B | $20M | $98M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $371M | $469M | $509M | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.16x | 0.57x | -1.02x | 11.77x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DCOM five years ago would be worth $12,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for FRGT. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +46.6% total return vs FRGT's -86.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 31.8% vs FRGT's -92.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.6% | +26.4% | -6.3% | +0.9% | -31.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.0% | +46.6% | +19.3% | +37.5% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +129.1% | -3.4% | +20.2% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +22.7% | -13.5% | +21.2% | -80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +68.6% | +93.3% | +122.3% | -47.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.6% | +31.8% | -1.2% | +6.3% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DCOM and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DCOM currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs FRGT's 8.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 1.05x | 0.83x | 1.21x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.60 | $37.87 | $7.53 | $53.26 | $32.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.62 | $24.57 | $4.48 | $31.52 | $14.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.6% | +98.4% | +79.5% | +80.8% | +53.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.7 | 60.5 | 58.3 | 58.7 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 193K | 271K | 504K | 723K | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TPVG and FWRD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DCOM as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", HUBG as "Hold", FWRD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs 3.1% for HUBG (target: $44). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs HUBG's 1.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.50 | $8.95 | $44.33 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 12 | 31 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | +17.1% | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $1.02 | $0.49 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.2% |
DCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TPVG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FRGT vs DCOM vs TPVG vs HUBG vs FWRD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 5% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Hub Group, Inc. at 25. 3x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 68x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 49x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD?
Over the past 5 years, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) delivered a total return of +22. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBG returned +122. 3% versus FRGT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 174% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -19. 5% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for Hub Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FWRD leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -40. 8% for Freight Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -47. 3% for FRGT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBG leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 68x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 49x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Hub Group, Inc. — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield), DCOM (2. 7% yield), HUBG (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FRGT, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRGT or DCOM or TPVG or HUBG or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 17. 1% yield). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +93. 3%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRGT and DCOM and TPVG and HUBG and FWRD?
These companies operate in different sectors (FRGT (Technology) and DCOM (Financial Services) and TPVG (Financial Services) and HUBG (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FRGT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUBG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DCOM, TPVG, HUBG pay a dividend while FRGT, FWRD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.