Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRHC vs LPLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
FRHC vs LPLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $8.51B | $24.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.03B | $16.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $863M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 31.1% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 99.3x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $7.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $837M | $1.04B |
FRHC vs LPLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Holding Cor… (FRHC) | 100 | 799.5 | +699.5% |
| LPL Financial Holdi… (LPLA) | 100 | 433.7 | +333.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRHC vs LPLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97
- 70.7% 10Y total return vs LPLA's 12.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, current ratio 1.32x
LPLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 37.2%, EPS growth -22.2%
- PEG 1.04 vs FRHC's 3.73
- 37.2% NII/revenue growth vs FRHC's 22.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.2% NII/revenue growth vs FRHC's 22.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 99.3x), PEG 1.04 vs 3.73 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs FRHC's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs LPLA's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.1% vs FRHC's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs FRHC's 0.2% |
FRHC vs LPLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FRHC vs LPLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRHC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LPLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 8.4x FRHC's $2.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.1% (LPLA) to 4.2% (FRHC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $17.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $470M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $863M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.0B | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.6% | +25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +78.0% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | +4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
LPLA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.4x trailing earnings, LPLA trades at a 71% valuation discount to FRHC's 99.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LPLA offers better value at 2.14x vs FRHC's 3.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.5B | $24.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.6B | $31.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 99.31x | 28.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.73x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.83x | 10.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.18x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.93x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.36x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LPLA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LPLA delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $0 for FRHC. LPLA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRHC's 1.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRHC scores 5/9 vs LPLA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.4% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.61x | 1.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $6.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $837M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $7.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 3.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FRHC five years ago would be worth $29,196 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,210 for LPLA. Over the past 12 months, LPLA leads with a -7.1% total return vs FRHC's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRHC at 20.5% vs LPLA's 17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.0% | -7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +62.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.0% | +102.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7066.5% | +1240.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +17.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRHC and LPLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPLA's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LPLA currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs FRHC's 71.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $194.01 | $403.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $107.97 | $281.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.7% | +76.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 96K | 875K |
Analyst Outlook
LPLA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 42.4% upside for LPLA (target: $441) vs -0.7% for FRHC (target: $138). LPLA is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $138.00 | $441.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
LPLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FRHC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FRHC vs LPLA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRHC or LPLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(LPLA) is the stronger pick with 37. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 7% for Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC). LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) offers the better valuation at 28. 4x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRHC or LPLA?
On trailing P/E, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(LPLA) is the cheapest at 28. 4x versus Freedom Holding Corp. at 99. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRHC or LPLA?
Over the past 5 years, Freedom Holding Corp.
(FRHC) delivered a total return of +192. 0%, compared to +102. 1% for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRHC returned +70. 7% versus LPLA's +1241%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRHC or LPLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freedom Holding Corp.
(FRHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus LPL Financial Holdings Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning LPLA is approximately 14% more volatile than FRHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 136% versus 161% for Freedom Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRHC or LPLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(LPLA) is pulling ahead at 37. 2% versus 22. 7% for Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LPL Financial Holdings Inc. grew EPS -22. 2% year-over-year, compared to -77. 9% for Freedom Holding Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRHC or LPLA?
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(LPLA) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus 4. 2% for Freedom Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRHC leads at 31. 1% versus 13. 4% for LPLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRHC leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRHC or LPLA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPLA: 42.
4% to $441. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRHC or LPLA?
In this comparison, LPLA (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. FRHC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRHC or LPLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(LPLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), +1241% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LPLA: +1241%, FRHC: +70. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRHC and LPLA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.