Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FRHC vs LPLA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FRHC
Freedom Holding Corp.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • KZ
Market Cap$8.51B
5Y Perf.+699.5%
LPLA
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$24.83B
5Y Perf.+333.7%

FRHC vs LPLA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FRHC logoFRHC
LPLA logoLPLA
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$8.51B$24.83B
Revenue (TTM)$2.03B$16.99B
Net Income (TTM)$3M$863M
Gross Margin52.6%25.6%
Operating Margin31.1%13.4%
Forward P/E99.3x13.8x
Total Debt$1.95B$7.26B
Cash & Equiv.$837M$1.04B

FRHC vs LPLALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FRHC
LPLA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Freedom Holding Cor… (FRHC)100799.5+699.5%
LPL Financial Holdi… (LPLA)100433.7+333.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FRHC vs LPLA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LPLA leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Freedom Holding Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FRHC
Freedom Holding Corp.
The Banking Pick

FRHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97
  • 70.7% 10Y total return vs LPLA's 12.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, current ratio 1.32x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LPLA
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
The Banking Pick

LPLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 37.2%, EPS growth -22.2%
  • PEG 1.04 vs FRHC's 3.73
  • 37.2% NII/revenue growth vs FRHC's 22.7%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLPLA logoLPLA37.2% NII/revenue growth vs FRHC's 22.7%
ValueLPLA logoLPLALower P/E (13.8x vs 99.3x), PEG 1.04 vs 3.73
Quality / MarginsLPLA logoLPLAEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs FRHC's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyFRHC logoFRHCBeta 0.97 vs LPLA's 1.10
DividendsLPLA logoLPLA0.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LPLA logoLPLA-7.1% vs FRHC's -8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)LPLA logoLPLAEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs FRHC's 0.2%

FRHC vs LPLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FRHCFreedom Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Brokerage Segment
35.0%$717M
Insurance Segment
33.3%$683M
Banking Segment
24.7%$506M
Other Segment
7.0%$144M
LPLALPL Financial Holdings Inc.
FY 2018
Asset-based Revenue
50.0%$973M
Money Market Cash Sweep Revenue
25.7%$500M
Recordkeeping Revenues
12.7%$247M
Sponsorship Programs
11.6%$225M

FRHC vs LPLA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLPLALAGGINGFRHC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FRHC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

LPLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 8.4x FRHC's $2.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.1% (LPLA) to 4.2% (FRHC).

MetricFRHC logoFRHCFreedom Holding C…LPLA logoLPLALPL Financial Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.0B$17.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$470M$2.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3M$863M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3.0B-$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.6%+25.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+31.1%+13.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.2%+5.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+78.0%-5.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.1%+4.2%
FRHC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LPLA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 28.4x trailing earnings, LPLA trades at a 71% valuation discount to FRHC's 99.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LPLA offers better value at 2.14x vs FRHC's 3.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFRHC logoFRHCFreedom Holding C…LPLA logoLPLALPL Financial Hol…
Market CapShares × price$8.5B$24.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.6B$31.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS99.31x28.35x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.73x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.83x10.65x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.18x1.46x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.93x4.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.36x
LPLA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LPLA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LPLA delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $0 for FRHC. LPLA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRHC's 1.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRHC scores 5/9 vs LPLA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFRHC logoFRHCFreedom Holding C…LPLA logoLPLALPL Financial Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.2%+18.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.0%+5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.8%+16.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+25.4%+19.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.61x1.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B$6.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$837M$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.0B$7.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.94x3.85x
LPLA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FRHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FRHC five years ago would be worth $29,196 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,210 for LPLA. Over the past 12 months, LPLA leads with a -7.1% total return vs FRHC's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRHC at 20.5% vs LPLA's 17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFRHC logoFRHCFreedom Holding C…LPLA logoLPLALPL Financial Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.9%-14.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-8.0%-7.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+75.1%+62.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+192.0%+102.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+7066.5%+1240.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.5%+17.5%
FRHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FRHC and LPLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FRHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPLA's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LPLA currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs FRHC's 71.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFRHC logoFRHCFreedom Holding C…LPLA logoLPLALPL Financial Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.97x1.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$194.01$403.58
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$107.97$281.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.7%+76.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.453.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded96K875K
Evenly matched — FRHC and LPLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LPLA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Consensus price targets imply 42.4% upside for LPLA (target: $441) vs -0.7% for FRHC (target: $138). LPLA is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFRHC logoFRHCFreedom Holding C…LPLA logoLPLALPL Financial Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$138.00$441.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts22
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises04
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.5%
LPLA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LPLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FRHC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallLPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FRHC vs LPLA: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FRHC or LPLA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

(LPLA) is the stronger pick with 37. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 7% for Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC). LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) offers the better valuation at 28. 4x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FRHC or LPLA?

On trailing P/E, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

(LPLA) is the cheapest at 28. 4x versus Freedom Holding Corp. at 99. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FRHC or LPLA?

Over the past 5 years, Freedom Holding Corp.

(FRHC) delivered a total return of +192. 0%, compared to +102. 1% for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRHC returned +70. 7% versus LPLA's +1241%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FRHC or LPLA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freedom Holding Corp.

(FRHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus LPL Financial Holdings Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning LPLA is approximately 14% more volatile than FRHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 136% versus 161% for Freedom Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FRHC or LPLA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

(LPLA) is pulling ahead at 37. 2% versus 22. 7% for Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LPL Financial Holdings Inc. grew EPS -22. 2% year-over-year, compared to -77. 9% for Freedom Holding Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FRHC or LPLA?

LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

(LPLA) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus 4. 2% for Freedom Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRHC leads at 31. 1% versus 13. 4% for LPLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRHC leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FRHC or LPLA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPLA: 42.

4% to $441. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FRHC or LPLA?

In this comparison, LPLA (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. FRHC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FRHC or LPLA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, LPL Financial Holdings Inc.

(LPLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), +1241% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LPLA: +1241%, FRHC: +70. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FRHC and LPLA?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FRHC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPLA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FRHC and LPLA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FRHC: 22.7% · LPLA: 37.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(FRHC: 4.2% · LPLA: 5.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FRHC: 99.3x · LPLA: 28.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.