Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FRPH vs WELL vs GMRE vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Industrial
FRPH vs WELL vs GMRE vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $406M | $149.25B | $94M | $132.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $11.63B | $148M | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $1.43B | $2M | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 39.1% | 68.8% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 4.4% | 24.9% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 78.4x | 595.7x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $179M | $21.38B | $654M | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $149M | $5.03B | $7M | $1.32B |
FRPH vs WELL vs GMRE vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Global Medical REIT… (GMRE) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRPH vs WELL vs GMRE vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRPH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 41.4x)
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs GMRE's -1.8%
GMRE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 63.5%
- 308.1% 10Y total return vs PLD's 259.1%
- 63.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
PLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 36.7% margin vs GMRE's 1.7%
- 3.3% ROA vs GMRE's 0.2%, ROIC 3.8% vs 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs GMRE's -1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 41.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs GMRE's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs PLD's 0.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 63.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs FRPH's -23.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs GMRE's 0.2%, ROIC 3.8% vs 2.0% |
FRPH vs WELL vs GMRE vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FRPH vs WELL vs GMRE vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GMRE leads in 1 of 6 categories
PLD leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • FRPH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WELL and PLD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 273.9x FRPH's $42M. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GMRE's 1.7%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $11.6B | $148M | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $2.8B | $95M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $1.4B | $2M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29M | $2.5B | $19M | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.1% | +39.1% | +68.8% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +4.4% | +24.9% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +12.3% | +1.7% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +67.9% | +21.9% | +12.6% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | +40.3% | +18.7% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.5% | +22.5% | -166.2% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GMRE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.5x trailing earnings, PLD trades at a 77% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GMRE's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $406M | $149.2B | $94M | $132.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $436M | $165.6B | $741M | $162.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 62.53x | 153.25x | 115.29x | 35.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.57x | 78.42x | 595.67x | 41.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.76x | 66.40x | 8.35x | 23.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.73x | 13.99x | 0.68x | 16.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 3.35x | 0.17x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.02x | 52.41x | — | 26.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLD delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $0 for GMRE. FRPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GMRE's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs GMRE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | +3.5% | +0.5% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +2.3% | +0.2% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +0.5% | +2.0% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +0.6% | +5.3% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.49x | 1.18x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $16.3B | $647M | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $149M | $5.0B | $7M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $179M | $21.4B | $654M | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.72x | 0.26x | 1.14x | 5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,362 for FRPH. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs FRPH's -23.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs FRPH's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +14.3% | +6.9% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.0% | +42.7% | +0.1% | +39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.9% | +189.5% | +5.6% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.4% | +202.3% | -21.4% | +37.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.8% | +223.1% | +308.1% | +259.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.7% | +42.5% | +1.8% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WELL and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLD currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs FRPH's 74.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.13x | 0.48x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.38 | $219.59 | $39.93 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.54 | $142.65 | $29.05 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +97.0% | +89.5% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 60.2 | 52.7 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 2.6M | 130K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GMRE and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WELL as "Buy", GMRE as "Buy", PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for GMRE (target: $40) vs 1.5% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, GMRE offers the higher dividend yield at 63.51% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $226.50 | $40.00 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 | 22 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +63.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.76 | $22.70 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
GMRE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PLD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FRPH vs WELL vs GMRE vs PLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for Global Medical REIT Inc. (GMRE). Prologis, Inc. (PLD) offers the better valuation at 35. 5x trailing P/E (41. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD?
On trailing P/E, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the cheapest at 35. 5x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, FRP Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -26. 4% for FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GMRE returned +308. 1% versus FRPH's +26. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately 450% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 118% for Global Medical REIT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -1. 8% for Global Medical REIT Inc. (GMRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prologis, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -94. 6% for Global Medical REIT Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 4. 8% for Global Medical REIT Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPH leads at 91. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FRP Holdings, Inc.
(FRPH) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 595. 7x for Global Medical REIT Inc. — 578. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GMRE: 11. 9% to $40. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD?
In this comparison, GMRE (63.
5% yield), PLD (2. 6% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. FRPH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRPH or WELL or GMRE or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, FRPH: +26. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRPH and WELL and GMRE and PLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GMRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WELL, GMRE, PLD pay a dividend while FRPH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.