Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FSI vs PESI vs HNNA vs NTIC vs GURE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Asset Management
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
FSI vs PESI vs HNNA vs NTIC vs GURE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Waste Management | Asset Management | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $80M | $207M | $81M | $76M | $4M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $59M | $36M | $86M | $14M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-18M | $8M | $-306K | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 4.1% | 70.1% | 37.0% | -82.1% |
| Operating Margin | 21.0% | -26.3% | 37.0% | -4.3% | -116.6% |
| Forward P/E | 26.2x | — | 8.0x | 4438.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $11M | $4M | $41M | $13M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $12M | $72M | $7M | $10M |
FSI vs PESI vs HNNA vs NTIC vs GURE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible Solutions … (FSI) | 100 | 378.3 | +278.3% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Hennessy Advisors, … (HNNA) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
| Northern Technologi… (NTIC) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSI vs PESI vs HNNA vs NTIC vs GURE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 402.2% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- +77.2% vs GURE's -40.8%
- 8.1% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 9.4% vs -21.7%
PESI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 43.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
HNNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 41.4%, current ratio 12.72x
- PEG 2.18 vs FSI's 3.10
- Beta 0.30, yield 5.3%, current ratio 12.72x
NTIC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, GURE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% NII/revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.0% margin vs GURE's -195.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NTIC's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.2% vs GURE's -40.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 9.4% vs -21.7% |
FSI vs PESI vs HNNA vs NTIC vs GURE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FSI vs PESI vs HNNA vs NTIC vs GURE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HNNA leads in 2 of 6 categories
FSI leads 2 • PESI leads 0 • NTIC leads 0 • GURE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HNNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $86M annually — 6.2x GURE's $14M. HNNA is the more profitable business, keeping 28.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GURE's -195.8%. On growth, GURE holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $59M | $36M | $86M | $14M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | -$14M | $11M | -$2M | $1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$18M | $8M | -$305,653 | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$14M | $10M | -$3M | -$498,990 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +4.1% | +70.1% | +37.0% | -82.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | -26.3% | +37.0% | -4.3% | -116.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | -30.1% | +28.0% | -0.4% | -195.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -23.4% | +37.6% | -3.6% | -3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | -20.1% | — | +9.2% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.7% | -110.5% | -27.3% | -47.8% | +98.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HNNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, HNNA trades at a 100% valuation discount to NTIC's 4438.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HNNA offers better value at 2.18x vs FSI's 3.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $80M | $207M | $81M | $76M | $4M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $200M | $49M | $82M | $3M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.17x | -14.89x | 8.03x | 4438.89x | -0.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.10x | — | 2.18x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.16x | — | 3.62x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 3.36x | 2.27x | 0.90x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.93x | 4.11x | 0.82x | 1.00x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 132.03x | — | 6.03x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSI delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. GURE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HNNA's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HNNA scores 7/9 vs GURE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | -34.5% | +8.5% | -0.4% | -19.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | -20.2% | +5.3% | -0.3% | -16.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | -21.7% | +7.3% | -5.6% | -11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | -16.7% | +8.7% | -7.7% | -11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.09x | 0.41x | 0.17x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$7M | -$32M | $6M | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $12M | $72M | $7M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $4M | $41M | $13M | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.64x | -42.14x | 9.62x | 5.11x | -268.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSI five years ago would be worth $20,092 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $537 for GURE. Over the past 12 months, FSI leads with a +77.2% total return vs GURE's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSI at 31.8% vs GURE's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | -8.8% | +7.4% | -1.5% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.2% | +26.2% | +1.2% | +10.9% | -40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.0% | +21.7% | +66.8% | -24.9% | -87.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.9% | +45.6% | +37.6% | -40.7% | -94.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +402.2% | +178.6% | -35.0% | +39.6% | -95.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.8% | +6.8% | +18.6% | -9.1% | -50.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HNNA and NTIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HNNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTIC currently trades 79.7% from its 52-week high vs GURE's 30.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.85x | 0.30x | 0.38x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.48 | $16.50 | $13.19 | $10.03 | $11.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.55 | $8.02 | $8.90 | $7.10 | $2.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.7% | +67.7% | +77.3% | +79.7% | +30.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 41.5 | 51.6 | 44.8 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 164K | 9K | 10K | 60K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HNNA and GURE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HNNA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.26% vs FSI's 1.58%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | — | +5.3% | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | — | $0.54 | $0.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HNNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FSI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
FSI vs PESI vs HNNA vs NTIC vs GURE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSI or PESI or HNNA or NTIC or GURE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger pick with 19. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSI or PESI or HNNA or NTIC or GURE?
On trailing P/E, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus Northern Technologies International Corporation at 4438. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSI or PESI or HNNA or NTIC or GURE?
Over the past 5 years, Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(FSI) delivered a total return of +100. 9%, compared to -94. 6% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSI returned +402. 2% versus GURE's -95. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSI or PESI or HNNA or NTIC or GURE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 510% more volatile than HNNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 41% for Hennessy Advisors, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSI or PESI or HNNA or NTIC or GURE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is pulling ahead at 19. 9% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -99. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTIC leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSI or PESI or HNNA or NTIC or GURE?
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 0% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HNNA leads at 37. 0% versus -277. 8% for GURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HNNA leads at 70. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FSI or PESI or HNNA or NTIC or GURE?
In this comparison, HNNA (5.
3% yield), NTIC (2. 0% yield), FSI (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PESI, GURE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FSI or PESI or HNNA or NTIC or GURE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 5. 3% yield). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNNA: -35. 0%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FSI and PESI and HNNA and NTIC and GURE?
These companies operate in different sectors (FSI (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and HNNA (Financial Services) and NTIC (Basic Materials) and GURE (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HNNA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FSI, HNNA, NTIC pay a dividend while PESI, GURE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.