FSP vs CBRE

For growth investors, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP). CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) offers the better valuation at 37. 7x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) delivered a total return of +70. 1%, compared to -73. 5% for Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +394. 8% versus FSP's -65. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Franklin Street Properties Corp. 's 1. 13β — meaning FSP is approximately 1% more volatile than CBRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 104% for CBRE Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -10. 8% for Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBRE Group, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to 15. 7% for Franklin Street Properties Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBRE leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -42. 0% for Franklin Street Properties Corp. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBRE leads at 3. 2% versus -7. 6% for FSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSP leads at 43. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +394. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBRE: +394. 8%, FSP: -65. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.