Railroads
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FSTR vs ITRN vs KALU vs ZEUS vs STLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Aluminum
Steel
Steel
FSTR vs ITRN vs KALU vs ZEUS vs STLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Communication Equipment | Aluminum | Steel | Steel |
| Market Cap | $422M | $1.38B | $2.86B | $533M | $33.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $563M | $359M | $3.70B | $1.90B | $19.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $58M | $153M | $14M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 49.7% | 10.2% | 82.8% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 21.4% | 6.6% | 1.9% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 17.8x | 18.7x | 20.7x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $67M | $5M | $1.12B | $313M | $4.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $108M | $7M | $12M | $770M |
FSTR vs ITRN vs KALU vs ZEUS vs STLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) | 100 | 330.3 | +230.3% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 344.5 | +244.5% |
| Kaiser Aluminum Cor… (KALU) | 100 | 245.5 | +145.5% |
| Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) | 100 | 436.0 | +336.0% |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) | 100 | 877.0 | +777.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSTR vs ITRN vs KALU vs ZEUS vs STLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSTR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ITRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 1.18, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.28x
- 16.1% margin vs ZEUS's 0.7%
KALU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth 135.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.5%
- 11.5% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0%
- +169.4% vs ZEUS's +50.3%
ZEUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.49 vs KALU's 0.62
- PEG 0.49 vs 0.62
STLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs FSTR's 256.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.5% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0% | |
| Value | PEG 0.49 vs 0.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs ZEUS's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs KALU's 1.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs STLD's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.4% vs ZEUS's +50.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs ZEUS's 1.3%, ROIC 47.2% vs 4.3% |
FSTR vs ITRN vs KALU vs ZEUS vs STLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FSTR vs ITRN vs KALU vs ZEUS vs STLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ZEUS leads 1 • FSTR leads 1 • KALU leads 0 • STLD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.0B annually — 53.0x ITRN's $359M. ITRN is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZEUS's 0.7%. On growth, KALU holds the edge at +42.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $563M | $359M | $3.7B | $1.9B | $19.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $38M | $96M | $368M | $45M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $58M | $153M | $14M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | $71M | $24M | $42M | $665M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +49.7% | +10.2% | +82.8% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +21.4% | +6.6% | +1.9% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +16.1% | +4.1% | +0.7% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +19.7% | +0.7% | +2.2% | +3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.9% | +12.8% | +42.4% | +4.4% | +19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +170.0% | +10.0% | +183.2% | -21.7% | +93.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ZEUS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, ITRN trades at a 65% valuation discount to FSTR's 58.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZEUS offers better value at 0.58x vs STLD's 1.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $422M | $1.4B | $2.9B | $533M | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $485M | $1.3B | $4.0B | $834M | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.49x | 20.19x | 26.02x | 24.29x | 29.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.12x | 17.84x | 18.74x | 20.72x | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.66x | 0.86x | 0.58x | 1.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.12x | 13.33x | 12.68x | 10.59x | 18.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 3.85x | 0.85x | 0.27x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.50x | 5.22x | 3.54x | 0.97x | 3.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.75x | 20.72x | — | 127.14x | 67.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $2 for ZEUS. ITRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALU's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITRN scores 7/9 vs STLD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +27.3% | +18.7% | +2.4% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +15.8% | +5.9% | +1.3% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +47.2% | +7.8% | +4.3% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +29.5% | +9.4% | +5.6% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.02x | 1.36x | 0.55x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $63M | -$103M | $1.1B | $301M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $108M | $7M | $12M | $770M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $67M | $5M | $1.1B | $313M | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.65x | 32.28x | 4.84x | 2.15x | 20.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STLD five years ago would be worth $38,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,068 for KALU. Over the past 12 months, KALU leads with a +169.4% total return vs ZEUS's +50.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSTR at 54.5% vs ZEUS's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.6% | +42.2% | +47.7% | +9.1% | +32.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +120.5% | +76.7% | +169.4% | +50.3% | +79.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +268.6% | +206.4% | +193.5% | +15.1% | +143.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.4% | +180.2% | +40.7% | +51.7% | +280.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +256.0% | +233.6% | +135.1% | +138.5% | +940.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.5% | +45.2% | +43.2% | +4.8% | +34.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KALU's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs ZEUS's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.18x | 1.71x | 1.48x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.41 | $59.84 | $183.00 | $52.65 | $243.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.66 | $32.71 | $65.69 | $27.11 | $119.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +98.5% | +96.3% | +90.9% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 88.2 | 68.3 | 74.2 | 48.2 | 81.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 118K | 248K | 47 | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ITRN and STLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FSTR as "Hold", ITRN as "Hold", KALU as "Hold", ZEUS as "Buy", STLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -5.0% upside for ITRN (target: $56) vs -48.0% for FSTR (target: $21). For income investors, ITRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs STLD's 0.84%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $56.00 | $160.00 | $41.00 | $188.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 5 | 22 | 6 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +1.8% | +1.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.89 | $3.09 | $0.57 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.7% |
ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZEUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FSTR vs ITRN vs KALU vs ZEUS vs STLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the stronger pick with 11.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD?
On trailing P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus L. B. Foster Company at 58. 5x. On forward P/E, Steel Dynamics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Olympic Steel, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus Kaiser Aluminum Corporation's 0. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD?
Over the past 5 years, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) delivered a total return of +280. 6%, compared to +40. 7% for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STLD returned +940. 9% versus KALU's +135. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Kaiser Aluminum Corporation's 1. 71β — meaning KALU is approximately 45% more volatile than ITRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 136% for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is pulling ahead at 11.
5% versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaiser Aluminum Corporation grew EPS 135. 9% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for L. B. Foster Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITRN leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD?
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 1. 2% for Olympic Steel, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus 2. 5% for ZEUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITRN leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Kaiser Aluminum Corporation's 0. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for L. B. Foster Company — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITRN: -5. 0% to $56. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD?
In this comparison, ITRN (3.
2% yield), KALU (1. 8% yield), ZEUS (1. 2% yield), STLD (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FSTR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FSTR or ITRN or KALU or ZEUS or STLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +940. 9% 10Y return). Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STLD: +940. 9%, KALU: +135. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSTR and ITRN and KALU and ZEUS and STLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (FSTR (Industrials) and ITRN (Technology) and KALU (Basic Materials) and ZEUS (Basic Materials) and STLD (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FSTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KALU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZEUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ITRN, KALU, ZEUS, STLD pay a dividend while FSTR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.