Railroads
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FSTR vs STLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Steel
FSTR vs STLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Steel |
| Market Cap | $422M | $33.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $563M | $19.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $67M | $4.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $770M |
FSTR vs STLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) | 100 | 330.3 | +230.3% |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) | 100 | 877.0 | +777.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSTR vs STLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 1.87x
- Beta 1.24, current ratio 1.87x
STLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth -18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.5%
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs FSTR's 256.0%
- 3.6% revenue growth vs FSTR's 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs FSTR's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs FSTR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs STLD's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +120.5% vs STLD's +79.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs FSTR's 3.3%, ROIC 9.2% vs 6.9% |
FSTR vs STLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FSTR vs STLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.0B annually — 33.7x FSTR's $563M. STLD is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FSTR's 2.0%. On growth, FSTR holds the edge at +23.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $563M | $19.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $38M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | $665M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.9% | +19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +170.0% | +93.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.2x trailing earnings, STLD trades at a 50% valuation discount to FSTR's 58.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSTR's 14.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STLD's 18.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $422M | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $485M | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.49x | 29.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.12x | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.12x | 18.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.50x | 3.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.75x | 67.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STLD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STLD delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for FSTR. FSTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STLD's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSTR scores 6/9 vs STLD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $63M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $770M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $67M | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.65x | 20.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STLD five years ago would be worth $38,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,038 for FSTR. Over the past 12 months, FSTR leads with a +120.5% total return vs STLD's +79.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSTR at 54.5% vs STLD's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.6% | +32.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +120.5% | +79.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +268.6% | +143.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.4% | +280.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +256.0% | +940.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.5% | +34.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FSTR and STLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSTR is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STLD's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.41 | $243.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.66 | $119.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 88.2 | 81.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
STLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FSTR as "Hold" and STLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -19.1% upside for STLD (target: $188) vs -48.0% for FSTR (target: $21). STLD is the only dividend payer here at 0.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $188.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +2.7% |
FSTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STLD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FSTR vs STLD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSTR or STLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for L. B. Foster Company (FSTR). Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSTR or STLD?
On trailing P/E, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the cheapest at 29. 2x versus L. B. Foster Company at 58. 5x. On forward P/E, Steel Dynamics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSTR or STLD?
Over the past 5 years, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) delivered a total return of +280. 6%, compared to +140. 4% for L. B. Foster Company (FSTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STLD returned +940. 9% versus FSTR's +256. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSTR or STLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), L.
B. Foster Company (FSTR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Steel Dynamics, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning STLD is approximately 7% more volatile than FSTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, L. B. Foster Company (FSTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 47% for Steel Dynamics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSTR or STLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus 1. 7% for L. B. Foster Company (FSTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Steel Dynamics, Inc. grew EPS -18. 8% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for L. B. Foster Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSTR leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSTR or STLD?
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus 1. 4% for L. B. Foster Company — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STLD leads at 8. 1% versus 4. 1% for FSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSTR leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSTR or STLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for L. B. Foster Company — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STLD: -19. 1% to $188. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSTR or STLD?
In this comparison, STLD (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FSTR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FSTR or STLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +940. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STLD: +940. 9%, FSTR: +256. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSTR and STLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (FSTR (Industrials) and STLD (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
STLD pays a dividend while FSTR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.