Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FSTR vs STLD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FSTR
L.B. Foster Company

Railroads

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$422M
5Y Perf.+230.3%
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$33.75B
5Y Perf.+777.0%

FSTR vs STLD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FSTR logoFSTR
STLD logoSTLD
IndustryRailroadsSteel
Market Cap$422M$33.75B
Revenue (TTM)$563M$19.01B
Net Income (TTM)$11M$1.37B
Gross Margin21.2%14.0%
Operating Margin4.6%9.4%
Forward P/E26.1x15.6x
Total Debt$67M$4.21B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$770M

FSTR vs STLDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FSTR
STLD
StockMay 20May 26Return
L.B. Foster Company (FSTR)100330.3+230.3%
Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD)100877.0+777.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FSTR vs STLD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STLD leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. L.B. Foster Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FSTR
L.B. Foster Company
The Income Pick

FSTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 1.87x
  • Beta 1.24, current ratio 1.87x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
The Growth Play

STLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth -18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.5%
  • 9.4% 10Y total return vs FSTR's 256.0%
  • 3.6% revenue growth vs FSTR's 1.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSTLD logoSTLD3.6% revenue growth vs FSTR's 1.7%
ValueSTLD logoSTLDLower P/E (15.6x vs 26.1x)
Quality / MarginsSTLD logoSTLD7.2% margin vs FSTR's 2.0%
Stability / SafetyFSTR logoFSTRBeta 1.24 vs STLD's 1.32, lower leverage
DividendsSTLD logoSTLD0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FSTR logoFSTR+120.5% vs STLD's +79.8%
Efficiency (ROA)STLD logoSTLD8.5% ROA vs FSTR's 3.3%, ROIC 9.2% vs 6.9%

FSTR vs STLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FSTRL.B. Foster Company
FY 2025
Product
89.1%$481M
Service
10.9%$59M
STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc.
FY 2025
Steel Operations
69.9%$13.4B
Metals Recycling and Ferrous Resources Operations
22.7%$4.3B
Steel Fabrication Operations
7.4%$1.4B

FSTR vs STLD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSTRLAGGINGSTLD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

STLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.0B annually — 33.7x FSTR's $563M. STLD is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FSTR's 2.0%. On growth, FSTR holds the edge at +23.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFSTR logoFSTRL.B. Foster Compa…STLD logoSTLDSteel Dynamics, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$563M$19.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$38M$2.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$35M$665M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.2%+14.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.6%+9.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.0%+7.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.2%+3.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.9%+19.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+170.0%+93.1%
FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 29.2x trailing earnings, STLD trades at a 50% valuation discount to FSTR's 58.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSTR's 14.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STLD's 18.3x.

MetricFSTR logoFSTRL.B. Foster Compa…STLD logoSTLDSteel Dynamics, I…
Market CapShares × price$422M$33.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$485M$37.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS58.49x29.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.12x15.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.12x18.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.78x1.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.50x3.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.75x67.29x
FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

STLD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

STLD delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for FSTR. FSTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STLD's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSTR scores 6/9 vs STLD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFSTR logoFSTRL.B. Foster Compa…STLD logoSTLDSteel Dynamics, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+15.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.3%+8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.9%+9.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.9%+10.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.38x0.47x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$63M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$770M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$67M$4.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.65x20.39x
STLD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in STLD five years ago would be worth $38,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,038 for FSTR. Over the past 12 months, FSTR leads with a +120.5% total return vs STLD's +79.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSTR at 54.5% vs STLD's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFSTR logoFSTRL.B. Foster Compa…STLD logoSTLDSteel Dynamics, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+49.6%+32.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+120.5%+79.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+268.6%+143.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+140.4%+280.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+256.0%+940.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+54.5%+34.6%
FSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FSTR and STLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSTR is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STLD's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricFSTR logoFSTRL.B. Foster Compa…STLD logoSTLDSteel Dynamics, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x1.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$42.41$243.72
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.66$119.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.2%+95.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10088.281.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded86K1.1M
Evenly matched — FSTR and STLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

STLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates FSTR as "Hold" and STLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -19.1% upside for STLD (target: $188) vs -48.0% for FSTR (target: $21). STLD is the only dividend payer here at 0.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFSTR logoFSTRL.B. Foster Compa…STLD logoSTLDSteel Dynamics, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.00$188.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts727
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.96
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.9%+2.7%
STLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STLD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallL.B. Foster Company (FSTR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FSTR vs STLD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FSTR or STLD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(STLD) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for L. B. Foster Company (FSTR). Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FSTR or STLD?

On trailing P/E, Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(STLD) is the cheapest at 29. 2x versus L. B. Foster Company at 58. 5x. On forward P/E, Steel Dynamics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FSTR or STLD?

Over the past 5 years, Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(STLD) delivered a total return of +280. 6%, compared to +140. 4% for L. B. Foster Company (FSTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STLD returned +940. 9% versus FSTR's +256. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FSTR or STLD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), L.

B. Foster Company (FSTR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Steel Dynamics, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning STLD is approximately 7% more volatile than FSTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, L. B. Foster Company (FSTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 47% for Steel Dynamics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FSTR or STLD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(STLD) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus 1. 7% for L. B. Foster Company (FSTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Steel Dynamics, Inc. grew EPS -18. 8% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for L. B. Foster Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSTR leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FSTR or STLD?

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(STLD) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus 1. 4% for L. B. Foster Company — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STLD leads at 8. 1% versus 4. 1% for FSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSTR leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FSTR or STLD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(STLD) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for L. B. Foster Company — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STLD: -19. 1% to $188. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FSTR or STLD?

In this comparison, STLD (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. FSTR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FSTR or STLD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(STLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +940. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STLD: +940. 9%, FSTR: +256. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FSTR and STLD?

These companies operate in different sectors (FSTR (Industrials) and STLD (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

STLD pays a dividend while FSTR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FSTR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FSTR and STLD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FSTR: 23.9% · STLD: 19.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FSTR: 58.5x · STLD: 29.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.