Personal Products & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FTDR vs BLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
FTDR vs BLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.64B | $12.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.12B | $5.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $260M | $503M |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 28.8% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | 24.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.21B | $3.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $566M | $185M |
FTDR vs BLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) | 100 | 144.8 | +44.8% |
| TopBuild Corp. (BLD) | 100 | 382.7 | +282.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTDR vs BLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.04
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 13.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, current ratio 1.55x
BLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs FTDR's 120.4%
- +53.9% vs FTDR's +23.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs BLD's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 24.1x), PEG 0.70 vs 1.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs BLD's 9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs BLD's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.9% vs FTDR's +23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs BLD's 8.1%, ROIC 31.2% vs 13.7% |
FTDR vs BLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTDR vs BLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTDR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 2.7x FTDR's $2.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.3% (FTDR) to 9.0% (BLD). On growth, BLD holds the edge at +17.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $5.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $554M | $923M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $260M | $503M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $385M | $704M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | +28.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +17.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FTDR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, FTDR trades at a 20% valuation discount to BLD's 24.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FTDR offers better value at 0.91x vs BLD's 1.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $12.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.3B | $15.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.33x | 24.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.77x | 24.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.91x | 1.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.80x | 15.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.36x | 5.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.92x | 17.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR delivers a 99.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $100 in annual profit, vs $22 for BLD. BLD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTDR's 5.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTDR scores 8/9 vs BLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +99.9% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.2% | +13.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.0% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.01x | 1.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $646M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $566M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.24x | 12.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FTDR and BLD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLD five years ago would be worth $19,681 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,977 for FTDR. Over the past 12 months, BLD leads with a +53.9% total return vs FTDR's +23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTDR at 29.7% vs BLD's 27.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.7% | +53.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.4% | +104.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.8% | +96.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.4% | +1215.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.7% | +27.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FTDR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTDR is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLD's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTDR currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs BLD's 78.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.77 | $559.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.47 | $273.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +78.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 688K | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FTDR as "Hold" and BLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for BLD (target: $538) vs 4.9% for FTDR (target: $69).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $69.33 | $537.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.1% | +3.5% |
FTDR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
FTDR vs BLD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTDR or BLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for TopBuild Corp. (BLD). Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TopBuild Corp. (BLD) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTDR or BLD?
On trailing P/E, Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus TopBuild Corp. at 24. 0x. On forward P/E, Frontdoor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Frontdoor, Inc. wins at 0. 70x versus TopBuild Corp. 's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTDR or BLD?
Over the past 5 years, TopBuild Corp.
(BLD) delivered a total return of +96. 8%, compared to +29. 8% for Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLD returned +1215% versus FTDR's +120. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTDR or BLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus TopBuild Corp. 's 1. 47β — meaning BLD is approximately 41% more volatile than FTDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TopBuild Corp. (BLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 136% versus 5% for Frontdoor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTDR or BLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus 1. 5% for TopBuild Corp. (BLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Frontdoor, Inc. grew EPS 13. 6% year-over-year, compared to -10. 0% for TopBuild Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTDR leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTDR or BLD?
Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 9. 6% for TopBuild Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTDR leads at 19. 1% versus 14. 6% for BLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTDR leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTDR or BLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 70x versus TopBuild Corp. 's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for TopBuild Corp. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLD: 22. 5% to $537. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTDR or BLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FTDR or BLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TopBuild Corp.
(BLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1215% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLD: +1215%, FTDR: +120. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTDR and BLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTDR (Consumer Cyclical) and BLD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.