Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FTK vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
FTK vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $488M | $1.84T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $252M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | -8.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | 23.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $98M |
FTK vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flotek Industries, … (FTK) | 100 | 177.6 | +77.6% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTK vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 147.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.4%
- 26.9% revenue growth vs SOC's 9.5%
- 11.8% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.51
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs FTK's -74.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, current ratio 0.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs SOC's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 23.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs FTK's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.6% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.3% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 15.1% vs -44.6% |
FTK vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FTK vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTK is the larger business by revenue, generating $252M annually — 198.2x SOC's $1M. FTK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $252M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | -8.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.4% | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SOC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $488M | $1.84T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $533M | $1.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.29x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.83x | 7.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.68x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.18x | 2359.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 93.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTK leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTK delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTK scores 4/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.8% | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.3% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.1% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.2% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $44M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.96x | -2.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTK five years ago would be worth $16,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, FTK leads with a +59.6% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTK at 63.3% vs SOC's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.6% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +335.5% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.3% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTK and SOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOC is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTK's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTK currently trades 79.4% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.41 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FTK as "Buy" and SOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 54.3% for FTK (target: $25).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FTK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FTK vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTK or SOC a better buy right now?
Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTK or SOC?
On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp.
is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTK or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) delivered a total return of +63. 6%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 4% versus FTK's -74. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTK or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Flotek Industries, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning FTK is approximately 15% more volatile than SOC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FTK or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flotek Industries, Inc.
grew EPS 147. 1% year-over-year, compared to 40. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTK or SOC?
Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTK leads at 11. 9% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTK leads at 24. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTK or SOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 8x for Flotek Industries, Inc. — 16. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTK or SOC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FTK or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOC: +32. 4%, FTK: -74. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTK and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.