Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FTLF vs MGPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
FTLF vs MGPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries |
| Market Cap | $87M | $413M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $521M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-240M |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | -51.2% |
| Forward P/E | 7.0x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $18M |
FTLF vs MGPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) | 100 | 692.8 | +592.8% |
| MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTLF vs MGPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTLF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.34
- Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 68.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.2%
- 153.0% 10Y total return vs MGPI's -12.7%
MGPI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 2.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- -38.3% vs FTLF's -40.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs MGPI's -46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs MGPI's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -38.3% vs FTLF's -40.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs MGPI's -19.1%, ROIC 21.6% vs -6.7% |
FTLF vs MGPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FTLF vs MGPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTLF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $521M annually — 7.4x FTLF's $71M. FTLF is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGPI's -46.0%. On growth, FTLF holds the edge at +47.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $521M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$240M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +36.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | -51.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | -46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.0% | -12.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.1% | -44.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MGPI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $87M | $413M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96M | $661M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.26x | -3.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.00x | 12.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.29x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.55x | 0.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.11x | 5.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTLF leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTLF delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-32 for MGPI. MGPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTLF's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTLF scores 8/9 vs MGPI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | -32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | -19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | -6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +28.4% | -8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | $248M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $267M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.14x | -40.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTLF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTLF five years ago would be worth $17,869 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,519 for MGPI. Over the past 12 months, MGPI leads with a -38.3% total return vs FTLF's -40.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTLF at 2.6% vs MGPI's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.9% | -19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.2% | -38.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | -79.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.7% | -64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +153.0% | -12.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | -41.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTLF and MGPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTLF is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGPI's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGPI currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs FTLF's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.98 | $34.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.67 | $16.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.4% | +55.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.5 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 302K |
Analyst Outlook
MGPI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FTLF as "Buy" and MGPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 227.6% upside for FTLF (target: $31) vs 50.1% for MGPI (target: $29). MGPI is the only dividend payer here at 2.50% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.50 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
FTLF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MGPI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FTLF vs MGPI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTLF or MGPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTLF or MGPI?
On forward P/E, FitLife Brands, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTLF or MGPI?
Over the past 5 years, FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) delivered a total return of +78. 7%, compared to -64. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTLF returned +175. 5% versus MGPI's -17. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTLF or MGPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus MGP Ingredients, Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning MGPI is approximately 85% more volatile than FTLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 37% for FitLife Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTLF or MGPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FitLife Brands, Inc. grew EPS 68. 1% year-over-year, compared to -419. 9% for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTLF leads at 32. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTLF or MGPI?
FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus -20. 1% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTLF leads at 20. 3% versus -17. 6% for MGPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTLF leads at 43. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTLF or MGPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FitLife Brands, Inc.
(FTLF) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FTLF: 227. 6% to $30. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTLF or MGPI?
In this comparison, MGPI (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. FTLF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FTLF or MGPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGP Ingredients, Inc.
(MGPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGPI: -17. 3%, FTLF: +175. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTLF and MGPI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FTLF is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MGPI pays a dividend while FTLF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.