FTLF vs WMT

For growth investors, FitLife Brands, Inc.

(FTLF) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, FitLife Brands, Inc.

(FTLF) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, FitLife Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FitLife Brands, Inc. wins at 0. 27x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to +93. 5% for FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus FTLF's +175. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus FitLife Brands, Inc. 's 0. 34β — meaning FTLF is approximately 191% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FitLife Brands, Inc.

(FTLF) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FitLife Brands, Inc. grew EPS 68. 1% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTLF leads at 32. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

FitLife Brands, Inc.

(FTLF) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTLF leads at 20. 3% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTLF leads at 43. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FTLF: 219. 0% to $30. 50.

In this comparison, WMT (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. FTLF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, FTLF: +175. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FTLF is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while FTLF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.