FTW
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$328M
5Y Perf.+11.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FTW vs BN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BN
Brookfield Corporation
Asset Management
Market Cap$104.40B
5Y Perf.+30.8%
FTW vs BN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FTW | BN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $328M | $104.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $77.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $1.31B |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 39.9% |
| Forward P/E | 48.0x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $263.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $973K | $16.24B |
FTW vs BN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FTW
BN
| Stock | Aug 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQV Ventures Acquis… (FTW) | 100 | 111.1 | +11.1% |
| Brookfield Corporat… (BN) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTW vs BN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FTW leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Brookfield Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FTW
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick
FTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.34
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 1.51x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BN
Brookfield Corporation
The Banking Pick
BN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (16.7x vs 48.0x)
- +25.5% vs FTW's +7.4%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | BN | Lower P/E (16.7x vs 48.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | FTW | 1.9% margin vs BN's 1.7% |
| Stability / Safety | FTW | Beta 0.34 vs BN's 1.57 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BN | +25.5% vs FTW's +7.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FTW | 1.9% ROA vs BN's 0.3% |
FTW vs BN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBNLAGGINGFTW
FTWEQV Ventures Acquisit…
1leads
BNBrookfield Corporation
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FTWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BN1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BN2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FTW4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BN and FTW operate at a comparable scale, with $77.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | BNBrookfield Corpor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $77.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $32.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +40.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +39.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -170.0% | +73.1% |
BN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
BN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 48.0x trailing earnings, FTW trades at a 100% valuation discount to BN's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BN's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTW's 47.7x.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | BNBrookfield Corpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $328M | $104.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $327M | $351.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.04x | 9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.69x | 8.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
BN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTW delivers a 2.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $1 for BN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BN scores 5/9 vs FTW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | BNBrookfield Corpor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$973,483 | $247.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $973,483 | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $263.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.64x |
FTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FTW and BN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, BN leads with a +25.5% total return vs FTW's +7.4%.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | BNBrookfield Corpor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.4% | +25.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +122.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +89.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +308.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +30.5% |
Evenly matched — FTW and BN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTW and BN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BN's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs FTW's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | BNBrookfield Corpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.75 | $49.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.21 | $36.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 5.9M |
Evenly matched — FTW and BN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | BNBrookfield Corpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
BN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FTW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallBrookfield Corporation (BN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FTW vs BN: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTW or BN a better buy right now?
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) offers the better valuation at 48. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTW or BN?
On trailing P/E, EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) is the cheapest at 48. 0x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x.
03Which is safer — FTW or BN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Brookfield Corporation's 1. 57β — meaning BN is approximately 359% more volatile than FTW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — FTW or BN?
Brookfield Corporation (BN) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BN leads at 39. 9% versus 0. 0% for FTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BN leads at 40. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — FTW or BN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is FTW or BN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between FTW and BN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
P/E Ratio<
x
(FTW: 48.0x · BN: 9999.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.