FTW
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$328M
5Y Perf.+11.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FTW vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-72.1%
FTW vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FTW | PSFE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $328M | $485M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 48.0x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $973K | $1.35B |
FTW vs PSFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FTW
PSFE
| Stock | Aug 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQV Ventures Acquis… (FTW) | 100 | 111.1 | +11.1% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 27.9 | -72.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTW vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FTW leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Paysafe Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FTW
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick
FTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.34
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 1.51x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
The Value Play
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 48.0x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | PSFE | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 48.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | FTW | 1.9% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% |
| Stability / Safety | FTW | Beta 0.34 vs PSFE's 2.35 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FTW | +7.4% vs PSFE's -37.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FTW | 1.9% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8% |
FTW vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FTW vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFTWLAGGINGPSFE
PSFEPaysafe Limited
1leads
FTWEQV Ventures Acquisit…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PSFEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FTW1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PSFE3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FTW4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FTW2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and FTW operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -170.0% | -183.3% |
FTW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTW's 47.7x.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $328M | $485M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $327M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.04x | -2.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.69x | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.17x |
PSFE leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTW delivers a 2.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSFE scores 4/9 vs FTW's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$973,483 | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $973,483 | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x |
FTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FTW and PSFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, FTW leads with a +7.4% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.4% | -37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -34.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -13.3% |
Evenly matched — FTW and PSFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTW currently trades 80.4% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.75 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.21 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 361K |
FTW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FTW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallEQV Ventures Acquisition Co… (FTW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FTW vs PSFE: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTW or PSFE a better buy right now?
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) offers the better valuation at 48. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — FTW or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 587% more volatile than FTW relative to the S&P 500.
03Which has better profit margins — FTW or PSFE?
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus 0. 0% for FTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSFE leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — FTW or PSFE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is FTW or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between FTW and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTW (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.