FTW
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$328M
5Y Perf.+11.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FTW vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$287.62B
5Y Perf.+68.5%
FTW vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FTW | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $328M | $287.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 48.0x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $973K | $182.09B |
FTW vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FTW
GS
| Stock | Aug 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQV Ventures Acquis… (FTW) | 100 | 111.1 | +11.1% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 168.5 | +68.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTW vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GS leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FTW
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick
FTW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.34
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 1.51x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick
GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (15.8x vs 48.0x)
- 11.3% margin vs FTW's 1.9%
- 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | GS | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 48.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | GS | 11.3% margin vs FTW's 1.9% |
| Stability / Safety | FTW | Beta 0.34 vs GS's 1.47 |
| Dividends | GS | 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GS | +70.6% vs FTW's +7.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FTW | 1.9% ROA vs GS's 0.9% |
FTW vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FTW vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGSLAGGINGFTW
FTWEQV Ventures Acquisit…
0leads
GSThe Goldman Sachs Gro…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FTWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GS1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GS2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS and FTW operate at a comparable scale, with $126.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -170.0% | +45.8% |
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
GS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, GS trades at a 52% valuation discount to FTW's 48.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GS's 34.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTW's 47.7x.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $328M | $287.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $327M | $722.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.04x | 22.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.69x | 34.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
GS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FTW and GS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for FTW. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GS scores 4/9 vs FTW's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$973,483 | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $973,483 | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.31x |
Evenly matched — FTW and GS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FTW and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +70.6% total return vs FTW's +7.4%.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.4% | +70.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +195.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +43.5% |
Evenly matched — FTW and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTW and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GS currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs FTW's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.75 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.21 | $547.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 2.0M |
Evenly matched — FTW and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FTWEQV Ventures Acqu… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $980.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallThe Goldman Sachs Group, In… (GS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FTW vs GS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTW or GS a better buy right now?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) a "Hold" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTW or GS?
On trailing P/E, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. at 48. 0x.
03Which is safer — FTW or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 306% more volatile than FTW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — FTW or GS?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GS leads at 14. 5% versus 0. 0% for FTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GS leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — FTW or GS?
In this comparison, GS (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. FTW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is FTW or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp.
(FTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36)). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between FTW and GS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FTW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while FTW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
P/E Ratio<
x
(FTW: 48.0x · GS: 22.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.