Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FURY vs EXK vs AG vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Other Precious Metals
Silver
Gold
FURY vs EXK vs AG vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Other Precious Metals | Silver | Gold |
| Market Cap | $113M | $2.99B | $10.55B | $12.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $330M | $1.27B | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-109M | $-94M | $174M | $559M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% | 35.5% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.7% | 29.0% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.3x | 20.4x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $65K | $120M | $314M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $106M | $792M | $242M |
FURY vs EXK vs AG vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fury Gold Mines Lim… (FURY) | 100 | 44.4 | -55.6% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 528.6 | +428.6% |
| First Majestic Silv… (AG) | 100 | 213.5 | +113.5% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 544.8 | +444.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FURY vs EXK vs AG vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FURY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 5.32x
EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 19.1x)
AG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.56, yield 0.1%
- Rev growth 128.2%, EPS growth 202.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.8%
- 128.2% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2%
- 0.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs EXK's 182.7%
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
- 35.6% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
- Beta 1.26 vs EXK's 1.71, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 128.2% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs EXK's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs EXK's 1.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs FURY's +59.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs FURY's -125.8%, ROIC 15.3% vs -4.4% |
FURY vs EXK vs AG vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FURY vs EXK vs AG vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HL leads in 2 of 6 categories
AG leads 2 • FURY leads 0 • EXK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL and FURY operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, AG holds the edge at +171.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $330M | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $49M | $636M | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$109M | -$94M | $174M | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$129M | $351M | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +9.3% | +35.5% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -1.7% | +29.0% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -28.4% | +13.7% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -39.1% | +27.7% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +154.0% | +171.8% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | -97.5% | +4.8% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.9x trailing earnings, HL trades at a 40% valuation discount to AG's 61.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AG's 15.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $3.0B | $10.6B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $109M | $3.0B | $10.1B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.11x | -78.08x | 61.06x | 36.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.34x | 20.39x | 19.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.34x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 76.02x | 15.82x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 13.72x | 8.25x | 8.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 5.07x | 3.27x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 30.01x | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-135 for FURY. FURY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs FURY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -135.1% | -18.4% | +5.9% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -125.8% | -9.2% | +4.1% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +1.5% | +13.1% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +1.6% | +11.7% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.25x | 0.10x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $14M | -$478M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $106M | $792M | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65,000 | $120M | $314M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9916.09x | -39.17x | 20.24x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AG and HL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,440 for FURY. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs FURY's +59.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AG at 46.3% vs FURY's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +12.5% | +33.1% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.2% | +193.4% | +241.7% | +271.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | +144.0% | +212.9% | +194.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | +61.1% | +31.0% | +150.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | +182.7% | +128.5% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | +34.6% | +46.3% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EXK and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXK currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.71x | 1.56x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.02 | $15.15 | $32.03 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $3.14 | $5.49 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.3% | +67.0% | +66.7% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 47.6 | 52.9 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 466K | 9.4M | 16.9M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
AG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FURY as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", AG as "Hold", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 236.1% upside for FURY (target: $2) vs 24.0% for AG (target: $27).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $12.75 | $26.50 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 | 11 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.1% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.02 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.0% |
HL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
FURY vs EXK vs AG vs HL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FURY or EXK or AG or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.
(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Hecla Mining Company (HL) offers the better valuation at 36. 9x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FURY or EXK or AG or HL?
On trailing P/E, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the cheapest at 36.
9x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Endeavour Silver Corp. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FURY or EXK or AG or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to -55. 6% for Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus FURY's -53. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FURY or EXK or AG or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
26β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 36% more volatile than HL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FURY or EXK or AG or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.
(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AG leads at 26. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FURY or EXK or AG or HL?
Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
6% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 0. 0% for FURY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FURY or EXK or AG or HL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Endeavour Silver Corp.
(EXK) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FURY: 236. 1% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FURY or EXK or AG or HL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FURY or EXK or AG or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
26), +360. 6% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HL: +360. 6%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FURY and EXK and AG and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FURY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.