FURY
Fury Gold Mines Limited
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$113M
5Y Perf.-55.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FURY vs MTA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
Other Precious Metals
Market Cap$659M
5Y Perf.+20.1%
FURY vs MTA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FURY | MTA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Other Precious Metals |
| Market Cap | $113M | $659M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-109M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -191.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 111.3x |
| Total Debt | $65K | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $5M |
FURY vs MTA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FURY
MTA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fury Gold Mines Lim… (FURY) | 100 | 44.4 | -55.6% |
| Metalla Royalty & S… (MTA) | 100 | 120.1 | +20.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FURY vs MTA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MTA leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. Fury Gold Mines Limited is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FURY
Fury Gold Mines Limited
The Income Pick
FURY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.37
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 5.32x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 5.32x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
The Growth Play
MTA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -18.7%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -25.4%
- 25.3% 10Y total return vs FURY's -53.5%
- -18.7% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MTA | -18.7% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2% |
| Quality / Margins | FURY | 0.3% margin vs MTA's -223.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FURY | Beta 1.37 vs MTA's 1.42, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MTA | +131.9% vs FURY's +59.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MTA | -6.4% ROA vs FURY's -125.8%, ROIC -4.0% vs -4.4% |
FURY vs MTA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMTALAGGINGFURY
FURYFury Gold Mines Limit…
0leads
MTAMetalla Royalty & Str…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FURYMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MTA1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MTA6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MTA5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTA and FURY operate at a comparable scale, with $4M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FURYFury Gold Mines L… | MTAMetalla Royalty &… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$109M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +46.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -191.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -168.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +107.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +28.8% |
MTA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FURY and MTA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FURYFury Gold Mines L… | MTAMetalla Royalty &… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $659M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $109M | $665M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.11x | -29.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 111.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 273.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 2.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — FURY and MTA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTA delivers a -6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-135 for FURY. FURY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTA's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTA scores 4/9 vs FURY's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | FURYFury Gold Mines L… | MTAMetalla Royalty &… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -135.1% | -6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -125.8% | -6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | -5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65,000 | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9916.09x | -2.64x |
MTA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTA five years ago would be worth $7,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,440 for FURY. Over the past 12 months, MTA leads with a +131.9% total return vs FURY's +59.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTA at 12.0% vs FURY's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FURYFury Gold Mines L… | MTAMetalla Royalty &… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | -8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.2% | +131.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | +40.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | -25.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | +2531.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | +12.0% |
MTA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FURY and MTA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FURY is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTA's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTA currently trades 77.0% from its 52-week high vs FURY's 58.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FURYFury Gold Mines L… | MTAMetalla Royalty &… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.02 | $9.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $2.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.3% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 466K | 486K |
Evenly matched — FURY and MTA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FURY as "Buy" and MTA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 236.1% upside for FURY (target: $2) vs 5.3% for MTA (target: $8).
| Metric | FURYFury Gold Mines L… | MTAMetalla Royalty &… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MTA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallMetalla Royalty & Streaming… (MTA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FURY vs MTA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FURY or MTA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FURY or MTA?
Over the past 5 years, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
(MTA) delivered a total return of -25. 6%, compared to -55. 6% for Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTA returned +25. 3% versus FURY's -53. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FURY or MTA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
37β versus Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. 's 1. 42β — meaning MTA is approximately 4% more volatile than FURY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FURY or MTA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -508. 3% for Fury Gold Mines Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FURY or MTA?
Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -452. 8% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FURY leads at 0. 0% versus -255. 3% for MTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTA leads at 25. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FURY or MTA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FURY: 236.
1% to $2. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — FURY or MTA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FURY or MTA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
(MTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTA: +25. 3%, FURY: -53. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FURY and MTA?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.