Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FUSE logo
FUSE
AIXI logo
AIXI
KO logo
KO
BBAI logo
BBAI
AEYE logo
AEYE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FUSE vs AIXI vs KO vs BBAI vs AEYE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FUSE
Fusemachines Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$37M
5Y Perf.-87.6%
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-99.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$342.09B
5Y Perf.+28.1%
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.87B
5Y Perf.+72.1%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$84M
5Y Perf.-5.8%

FUSE vs AIXI vs KO vs BBAI vs AEYE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FUSE logoFUSE
AIXI logoAIXI
KO logoKO
BBAI logoBBAI
AEYE logoAEYE
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationBeverages - Non-AlcoholicInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$37M$5M$342.09B$19.87B$84M
Revenue (TTM)$10M$83M$49.28B$127M$41M
Net Income (TTM)$262K$-116M$13.70B$-289M$-4M
Gross Margin54.8%64.8%61.7%25.8%78.0%
Operating Margin-89.5%-132.8%29.3%-68.3%-6.8%
Forward P/E24.3x
Total Debt$1M$47M$45.49B$24M$13M
Cash & Equiv.$4M$2M$10.27B$87M$5M

FUSE vs AIXI vs KO vs BBAI vs AEYELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FUSE
AIXI
KO
BBAI
AEYE
StockMar 23Jun 26Return
Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE)10012.4-87.6%
Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI)1000.7-99.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100128.1+28.1%
BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI)100172.1+72.1%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)10094.2-5.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FUSE vs AIXI vs KO vs BBAI vs AEYE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. AudioEye, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. AIXI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FUSE
Fusemachines Inc.
The Technology Pick

FUSE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
The Income Pick

AIXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.13
  • Beta 1.13, current ratio 0.10x
  • Beta 1.13 vs BBAI's 3.52
Best for: income & stability and defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Long-Run Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 112.9% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 67.3%
  • 27.8% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
  • 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +15.0% vs FUSE's -89.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

BBAI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 3.52, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Growth Play

AEYE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 30.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
  • 14.5% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAEYE logoAEYE14.5% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
ValueAEYE logoAEYEBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
Stability / SafetyAIXI logoAIXIBeta 1.13 vs BBAI's 3.52
DividendsKO logoKO2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KO logoKO+15.0% vs FUSE's -89.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs AIXI's -171.0%

FUSE vs AIXI vs KO vs BBAI vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the AI Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the AI Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FUSEFusemachines Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AIXIXiao-I Corporation
FY 2025
Technology Service
79.1%$2M
Hardware Products Member
20.9%$567,894
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
BBAIBigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$158M
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2025
Enterprise
100.0%$18M

FUSE vs AIXI vs KO vs BBAI vs AEYE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGAEYE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 5137.5x FUSE's $10M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$83M$49.3B$127M$41M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$8M-$109M$15.5B-$75M$69,000
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$261,897-$116M$13.7B-$289M-$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M-$4M$12.6B-$56M$6M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.8%+64.8%+61.7%+25.8%+78.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-89.5%-132.8%+29.3%-68.3%-6.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.7%-140.4%+27.8%-2.3%-9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-82.3%-4.3%+25.5%-44.3%+14.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.8%-97.8%+12.1%-0.9%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-46.7%+18.2%+52.0%-41.7%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KO and AEYE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, KO's 25.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AEYE's 236.4x.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$37M$5M$342.1B$19.9B$84M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$34M$49M$377.3B$19.8B$91M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.90x-0.06x26.14x-5.12x-26.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.31x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.47x236.42x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.80x0.39x7.14x155.62x2.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.00x24.63x17.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF64.59x17.79x
Evenly matched — KO and AEYE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-71 for AEYE. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEYE's 2.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs AIXI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+41.1%-50.7%-71.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%-171.0%+13.1%-35.3%-11.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.8%-19.5%-20.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.5%+17.3%-19.6%-17.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–921744
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.33x0.04x2.75x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$44M$35.2B-$63M$8M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$2M$10.3B$87M$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$47M$45.5B$24M$13M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.49x-20.26x10.70x-18.17x-11.14x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $15,855 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $87 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +15.0% total return vs FUSE's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 28.1% vs AIXI's -79.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-24.7%+5.9%+15.8%-28.1%-32.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-89.1%-84.0%+15.0%+11.4%-45.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-99.2%+40.5%+110.0%+12.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.9%-99.1%+58.5%-57.2%-65.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.9%-99.1%+112.9%-57.3%+67.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.4%-79.7%+12.0%+28.1%+4.1%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FUSE's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.39x1.13x-0.15x3.52x2.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.00$62.00$82.66$9.39$16.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.80$0.27$65.35$3.01$5.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.1%+14.7%+96.1%+44.7%+40.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.037.937.758.446.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.8M13.5M12.7M38.3M148K
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: KO as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 8.6% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…BBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$86.29$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts484
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05621
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%+5.5%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FUSE vs AIXI vs KO vs BBAI vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FUSE or AIXI or KO or BBAI or AEYE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FUSE or AIXI or KO or BBAI or AEYE?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +58.

5%, compared to -99. 1% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +112. 9% versus AIXI's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FUSE or AIXI or KO or BBAI or AEYE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 52β — meaning BBAI is approximately -2482% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for AudioEye, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FUSE or AIXI or KO or BBAI or AEYE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fusemachines Inc. grew EPS 86. 1% year-over-year, compared to -361. 3% for Xiao-I Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FUSE or AIXI or KO or BBAI or AEYE?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -821. 1% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -783. 6% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FUSE or AIXI or KO or BBAI or AEYE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 42.

9% to $6. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FUSE or AIXI or KO or BBAI or AEYE?

In this comparison, KO (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. FUSE, AIXI, BBAI, AEYE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is FUSE or AIXI or KO or BBAI or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 9% 10Y return). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 9%, BBAI: -57. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FUSE and AIXI and KO and BBAI and AEYE?

These companies operate in different sectors (FUSE (Technology) and AIXI (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and BBAI (Technology) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

KO pays a dividend while FUSE, AIXI, BBAI, AEYE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.