Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FUSE vs SOUN vs KO vs BBAI vs AIXI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
FUSE vs SOUN vs KO vs BBAI vs AIXI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $37M | $3.20B | $342.09B | $19.87B | $5M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $184M | $49.28B | $127M | $83M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $262K | $-169M | $13.70B | $-289M | $-116M |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 38.0% | 61.7% | 25.8% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -89.5% | -115.9% | 29.3% | -68.3% | -132.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $4M | $45.49B | $24M | $47M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $248M | $10.27B | $87M | $2M |
FUSE vs SOUN vs KO vs BBAI vs AIXI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE) | 100 | 12.4 | -87.6% |
| SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) | 100 | 267.8 | +167.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 128.1 | +28.1% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 172.1 | +72.1% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUSE vs SOUN vs KO vs BBAI vs AIXI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUSE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SOUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 99.4%, EPS growth 96.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 75.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.11, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 4.59x
- Beta 3.11, current ratio 4.59x
- 99.4% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 112.9% 10Y total return vs SOUN's -1.5%
- 27.8% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +15.0% vs FUSE's -89.1%
Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AIXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.13
- Beta 1.13 vs BBAI's 3.52
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.4% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs BBAI's 3.52 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.0% vs FUSE's -89.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs AIXI's -171.0% |
FUSE vs SOUN vs KO vs BBAI vs AIXI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FUSE vs SOUN vs KO vs BBAI vs AIXI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 5 of 6 categories
SOUN leads 1 • FUSE leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • AIXI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 5137.5x FUSE's $10M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, SOUN holds the edge at +51.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $184M | $49.3B | $127M | $83M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$136M | $15.5B | -$75M | -$109M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $261,897 | -$169M | $13.7B | -$289M | -$116M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$84M | $12.6B | -$56M | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +38.0% | +61.7% | +25.8% | +64.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -89.5% | -115.9% | +29.3% | -68.3% | -132.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -91.8% | +27.8% | -2.3% | -140.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -82.3% | -45.8% | +25.5% | -44.3% | -4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +51.7% | +12.1% | -0.9% | -97.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -119.2% | +18.2% | +52.0% | -46.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SOUN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KO's 25.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOUN's 272.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $3.2B | $342.1B | $19.9B | $5M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $3.0B | $377.3B | $19.8B | $49M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.90x | -213.58x | 26.14x | -5.12x | -0.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.31x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.34x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 272.05x | 25.47x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.80x | 18.93x | 7.14x | 155.62x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.46x | 10.00x | 24.63x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 64.59x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. SOUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs AIXI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -40.1% | +41.1% | -50.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -25.8% | +13.1% | -35.3% | -171.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -16.8% | +15.8% | -19.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -4.2% | +17.3% | -19.6% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 1.33x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$244M | $35.2B | -$63M | $44M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $248M | $10.3B | $87M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $4M | $45.5B | $24M | $47M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.49x | -398.24x | 10.70x | -18.17x | -20.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $15,855 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $87 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +15.0% total return vs FUSE's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOUN at 40.1% vs AIXI's -79.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | -30.3% | +15.8% | -28.1% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.1% | -22.0% | +15.0% | +11.4% | -84.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | +174.7% | +40.5% | +110.0% | -99.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -1.5% | +58.5% | -57.2% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -1.5% | +112.9% | -57.3% | -99.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.4% | +40.1% | +12.0% | +28.1% | -79.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FUSE's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 3.11x | -0.15x | 3.52x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $22.17 | $82.66 | $9.39 | $62.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $5.83 | $65.35 | $3.01 | $0.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.1% | +33.3% | +96.1% | +44.7% | +14.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 45.2 | 37.7 | 58.4 | 37.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 27.2M | 12.7M | 38.3M | 13.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SOUN as "Buy", KO as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 69.1% upside for SOUN (target: $13) vs 8.6% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.50 | $86.29 | $6.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 48 | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 56 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FUSE vs SOUN vs KO vs BBAI vs AIXI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUSE or SOUN or KO or BBAI or AIXI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is the stronger pick with 99. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FUSE or SOUN or KO or BBAI or AIXI?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +58.
5%, compared to -99. 1% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +112. 9% versus AIXI's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FUSE or SOUN or KO or BBAI or AIXI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 52β — meaning BBAI is approximately -2482% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FUSE or SOUN or KO or BBAI or AIXI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is pulling ahead at 99. 4% versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SoundHound AI, Inc. grew EPS 96. 7% year-over-year, compared to -361. 3% for Xiao-I Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOUN leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FUSE or SOUN or KO or BBAI or AIXI?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -821. 1% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -783. 6% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FUSE or SOUN or KO or BBAI or AIXI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOUN: 69.
1% to $12. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — FUSE or SOUN or KO or BBAI or AIXI?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. FUSE, SOUN, BBAI, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FUSE or SOUN or KO or BBAI or AIXI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 9% 10Y return). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 9%, BBAI: -57. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FUSE and SOUN and KO and BBAI and AIXI?
These companies operate in different sectors (FUSE (Technology) and SOUN (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and BBAI (Technology) and AIXI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FUSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while FUSE, SOUN, BBAI, AIXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.