Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FVCB vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs FULT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FVCB vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs FULT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $302M | $2.52B | $355.61B | $207M | $4.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $120M | $902M | $49.28B | $90M | $1.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $169M | $13.70B | $14M | $392M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 73.6% | 61.7% | 54.7% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 24.3% | 29.3% | 7.0% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 11.5x | 25.3x | 11.8x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $25M | $327M | $45.49B | $52M | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $185M | $10.27B | $119M | $271M |
FVCB vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs FULT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) | 100 | 195.0 | +95.0% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FVCB vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs FULT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FVCB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 47.6%
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.73 vs 2.26
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
- 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 149.0% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs FULT's 0.99, lower leverage
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.82 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 3.2% vs FVCB's 2.8%
- 3.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.73 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs FULT's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0% |
FVCB vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs FULT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FVCB vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs FULT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FULT leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • FVCB leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 547.2x CZWI's $90M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $120M | $902M | $49.3B | $90M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $241M | $15.5B | $9M | $529M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $169M | $13.7B | $14M | $392M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $225M | $12.6B | $11M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.1% | +73.6% | +61.7% | +54.7% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +24.3% | +29.3% | +7.0% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +18.8% | +27.8% | +16.0% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +24.9% | +25.5% | +12.4% | +14.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | +39.5% | +18.2% | +63.0% | +47.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.2x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 59% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $302M | $2.5B | $355.6B | $207M | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $321M | $2.7B | $390.8B | $140M | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.88x | 14.47x | 27.18x | 14.70x | 11.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 11.54x | 25.27x | 11.79x | 11.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.11x | 2.06x | 2.43x | 2.90x | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 11.03x | 26.39x | 15.69x | 10.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 2.90x | 7.42x | 2.29x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.29x | 10.40x | 1.11x | 1.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.65x | 11.49x | 67.15x | 19.90x | 15.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. FVCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVCB scores 9/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +9.5% | +41.1% | +7.8% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% | +13.1% | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +7.9% | +15.8% | +2.0% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +2.4% | +17.3% | +0.6% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.17x | 1.33x | 0.28x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $142M | $35.2B | -$67M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $185M | $10.3B | $119M | $271M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $327M | $45.5B | $52M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.52x | 1.05x | 10.70x | 0.16x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,119 for FVCB. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | +17.6% | +20.3% | +24.3% | +21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.1% | +18.3% | +17.2% | +52.1% | +37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.8% | +48.5% | +47.0% | +153.7% | +96.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.2% | +44.4% | +65.6% | +69.0% | +61.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.8% | +108.5% | +121.1% | +149.0% | +114.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +14.1% | +13.7% | +36.4% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FVCB's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.76x | -0.20x | 0.50x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.41 | $48.27 | $84.04 | $22.62 | $23.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.13 | $39.20 | $65.35 | $12.83 | $16.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +99.8% | +98.3% | +94.9% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 63.1 | 60.6 | 51.2 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 266K | 12.7M | 41K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and FULT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FVCB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", KO as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FULT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for FVCB (target: $19) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FULT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.30% vs FVCB's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $46.00 | $86.13 | — | $23.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 10 | 48 | 2 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +3.0% | +2.5% | +1.7% | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 56 | 6 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $1.43 | $2.04 | $0.37 | $0.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.4% | +0.2% | +3.0% | +1.5% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FULT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FVCB vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs FULT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.
2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, FVCBankcorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +21. 2% for FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +149. 0% versus FVCB's +84. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately -593% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FVCBankcorp, Inc. grew EPS 47. 6% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FVCB: 13. 2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 0. 7% for FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB).
09Is FVCB or NBTB or KO or CZWI or FULT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FVCB and NBTB and KO and CZWI and FULT?
These companies operate in different sectors (FVCB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FULT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FVCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.