REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FVR vs NTST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
FVR vs NTST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $410M | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $176M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $185K |
| Gross Margin | -32.9% | 92.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 64.8x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $14M |
FVR vs NTST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FVR vs NTST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FVR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.90
- Better valuation composite
- +63.8% vs NTST's +32.6%
NTST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 40.7% 10Y total return vs FVR's 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs FVR's 12.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs FVR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs FVR's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.8% vs NTST's +32.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.0% ROA vs FVR's -0.3%, ROIC 2.1% vs 1.3% |
FVR vs NTST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTST is the larger business by revenue, generating $176M annually — 2.6x FVR's $69M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.1% (NTST) to -4.2% (FVR). On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $176M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $133M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $185,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $41M | $106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | +92.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +59.6% | +59.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +27.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | +110.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FVR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FVR's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NTST's 12.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $410M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $411M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -83.14x | 254.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 64.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.24x | 12.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.11x | 8.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.73x | 15.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTST leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTST delivers a 0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-1 for FVR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTST scores 6/9 vs FVR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $956,000 | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTST five years ago would be worth $11,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,459 for FVR. Over the past 12 months, FVR leads with a +63.8% total return vs NTST's +32.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTST at 8.3% vs FVR's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.3% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +63.8% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +27.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +40.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FVR and NTST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FVR's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FVR currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs NTST's 95.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.48 | $21.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.81 | $15.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FVR as "Buy" and NTST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for NTST (target: $22) vs -5.2% for FVR (target: $17). NTST is the only dividend payer here at 4.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.33 | $22.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
NTST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FVR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FVR vs NTST: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVR or NTST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 0% for FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR). NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) offers the better valuation at 254. 5x trailing P/E (64. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FVR or NTST?
Over the past 5 years, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) delivered a total return of +14. 9%, compared to +4. 6% for FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTST returned +40. 7% versus FVR's +4. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FVR or NTST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus FrontView REIT, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning FVR is approximately 1721% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FVR or NTST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 12. 0% for FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to 85. 0% for FrontView REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FVR or NTST?
NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 5% net margin versus -5. 7% for FrontView REIT, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTST leads at 25. 7% versus 16. 9% for FVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FVR or NTST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTST: 8.
2% to $22. 03.
07Which pays a better dividend — FVR or NTST?
In this comparison, NTST (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. FVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FVR or NTST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTST: +40. 7%, FVR: +4. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FVR and NTST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock. NTST pays a dividend while FVR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.