REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FVR vs NTST vs ADC vs NNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
FVR vs NTST vs ADC vs NNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $410M | $1.70B | $9.17B | $8.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $176M | $750M | $936M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $185K | $220M | $387M |
| Gross Margin | -32.9% | 92.4% | 87.6% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 27.7% | 48.0% | 63.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 65.8x | 38.9x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $0.00 | $3.35B | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $14M | $16M | $5M |
FVR vs NTST vs ADC vs NNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) | 100 | 97.4 | -2.6% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 133.4 | +33.4% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 102.7 | +2.7% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FVR vs NTST vs ADC vs NNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FVR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 0.93x
- +63.8% vs ADC's +4.3%
NTST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- PEG 1.12 vs NNN's 1.94
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
- PEG 1.12 vs 113.70
ADC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 135.6% 10Y total return vs NTST's 40.7%
NNN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.3%
- Beta 0.15, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.19x
- 41.4% margin vs FVR's -4.2%
- 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NTST's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | PEG 1.12 vs 113.70 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs FVR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs FVR's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NTST's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.8% vs ADC's +4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs FVR's -0.3%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.3% |
FVR vs NTST vs ADC vs NNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NNN leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTST leads 1 • FVR leads 1 • ADC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN is the larger business by revenue, generating $936M annually — 13.6x FVR's $69M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FVR's -4.2%. On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $176M | $750M | $936M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $133M | $638M | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $185,000 | $220M | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $41M | $106M | $110M | $464M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | +92.4% | +87.6% | +81.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +27.7% | +48.0% | +63.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +0.1% | +29.3% | +41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +59.6% | +59.9% | +14.7% | +49.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +27.7% | +18.7% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | +110.6% | +19.0% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FVR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 92% valuation discount to NTST's 254.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 1.93x vs ADC's 113.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $410M | $1.7B | $9.2B | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $411M | $1.7B | $12.5B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -83.14x | 254.50x | 43.12x | 21.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 65.77x | 38.94x | 21.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.35x | 113.70x | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.24x | 12.34x | 20.30x | 15.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.11x | 8.72x | 12.76x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.18x | 1.35x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.73x | 15.52x | 18.18x | 12.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-1 for FVR. FVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NNN's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTST scores 6/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +0.0% | +3.7% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +0.0% | +2.3% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +2.1% | +2.8% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +2.1% | +3.8% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 0.53x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $956,000 | -$14M | $3.3B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $14M | $16M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $0 | $3.4B | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | — | 2.54x | 2.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FVR and NTST and ADC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADC five years ago would be worth $12,927 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,459 for FVR. Over the past 12 months, FVR leads with a +63.8% total return vs ADC's +4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTST at 8.3% vs FVR's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.3% | +15.8% | +7.3% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +63.8% | +32.6% | +4.3% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +27.0% | +26.1% | +15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +14.9% | +29.3% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +40.7% | +135.6% | +37.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +8.3% | +8.0% | +4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FVR and ADC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FVR's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FVR currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs ADC's 93.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.08x | -0.14x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.48 | $21.30 | $82.08 | $46.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.81 | $15.24 | $69.56 | $38.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +95.6% | +93.0% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 57.7 | 46.8 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 1.2M | 1.1M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
NNN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FVR as "Buy", NTST as "Buy", ADC as "Buy", NNN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for ADC (target: $84) vs -5.2% for FVR (target: $17). For income investors, NNN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.30% vs ADC's 4.01%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.33 | $22.03 | $83.50 | $46.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 18 | 32 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% | +4.0% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.83 | $3.06 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
NNN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). NTST leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FVR vs NTST vs ADC vs NNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 5x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 12x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN?
Over the past 5 years, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) delivered a total return of +29.
3%, compared to +4. 6% for FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADC returned +135. 6% versus FVR's +5. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus FrontView REIT, Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning FVR is approximately -693% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 109% for NNN REIT, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -5. 7% for FrontView REIT, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 16. 9% for FVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 65. 8x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 44. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADC: 9. 4% to $83. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN?
In this comparison, NNN (5.
3% yield), NTST (4. 1% yield), ADC (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. FVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FVR or NTST or ADC or NNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 4. 0% yield, +135. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +135. 6%, FVR: +5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FVR and NTST and ADC and NNN?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NTST, ADC, NNN pay a dividend while FVR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.