Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GALT vs MDGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
GALT vs MDGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $145M | $12.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $-309M |
| Gross Margin | — | 93.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.7% |
| Total Debt | $106M | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $199M |
GALT vs MDGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galectin Therapeuti… (GALT) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 465.2 | +365.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GALT vs MDGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GALT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
MDGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- Rev growth 432.1%, EPS growth 41.3%
- 37.6% 10Y total return vs GALT's 80.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs GALT's -59.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -27.3% margin vs GALT's -29.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs GALT's 0.70 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.9% vs GALT's +65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -25.4% ROA vs GALT's -290.0% |
GALT vs MDGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GALT vs MDGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GALT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDGL and GALT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$312M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | -$309M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | -$272M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +93.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -27.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -24.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +126.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MDGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145M | $12.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $236M | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.96x | -42.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 20.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GALT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MDGL scores 3/9 vs GALT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -50.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -25.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -29.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -32.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $91M | $156M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106M | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.24x | -17.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $42,596 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,114 for GALT. Over the past 12 months, MDGL leads with a +82.9% total return vs GALT's +65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDGL at 20.4% vs GALT's 6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.4% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.4% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.7% | +74.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.9% | +326.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.0% | +3755.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | +20.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MDGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GALT's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDGL currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs GALT's 31.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.13 | $615.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $265.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.6% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 340K | 312K |
Analyst Outlook
MDGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GALT as "Buy" and MDGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 388.9% upside for GALT (target: $11) vs 30.7% for MDGL (target: $706).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $705.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MDGL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). GALT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
GALT vs MDGL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GALT or MDGL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
(GALT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GALT or MDGL?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +326. 0%, compared to -38. 9% for Galectin Therapeutics Inc. (GALT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +37. 6% versus GALT's +80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GALT or MDGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Galectin Therapeutics Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning GALT is approximately 24% more volatile than MDGL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GALT or MDGL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 41. 3% year-over-year, compared to -2. 7% for Galectin Therapeutics Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GALT or MDGL?
Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
(GALT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -30. 1% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GALT leads at 0. 0% versus -31. 3% for MDGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDGL leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GALT or MDGL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GALT or MDGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDGL: +37. 6%, GALT: +80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GALT and MDGL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GALT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.