Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GAM vs BLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
GAM vs BLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.50B | $166.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $252M | $20.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $202M | $6.10B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 49.4% |
| Operating Margin | 97.5% | 37.1% |
| Forward P/E | 6.0x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $14.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70K | $12.76B |
GAM vs BLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| General American In… (GAM) | 100 | 205.7 | +105.7% |
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 203.1 | +103.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GAM vs BLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.74
- Rev growth 180.6%, EPS growth -36.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 31.80x
BLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 246.4% 10Y total return vs GAM's 193.8%
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 180.6% NII/revenue growth vs BLK's 14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 20.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs BLK's 0.1% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs BLK's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs BLK's +19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs BLK's 0.1% |
GAM vs BLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GAM vs BLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.4B annually — 81.1x GAM's $252M. GAM is the more profitable business, keeping 97.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLK's 31.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $252M | $20.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $105,782 | $8.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $202M | $6.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +49.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +97.5% | +37.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +97.5% | +31.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +23.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | -22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GAM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, GAM trades at a 77% valuation discount to BLK's 25.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GAM's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BLK's 20.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $166.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $168.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.98x | 25.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.13x | 20.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.98x | 8.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 3.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GAM leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAM delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for BLK. GAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLK's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLK scores 6/9 vs GAM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.4% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $69,600 | $12.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $14.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAM five years ago would be worth $19,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,522 for BLK. Over the past 12 months, GAM leads with a +38.0% total return vs BLK's +19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GAM at 25.6% vs BLK's 20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.0% | +19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.1% | +76.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +35.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.8% | +246.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
GAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAM is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAM currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs BLK's 88.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.18 | $1219.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $51.22 | $906.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 798K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BLK is the only dividend payer here at 1.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1311.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $20.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
GAM leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
GAM vs BLK: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GAM or BLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is the stronger pick with 180. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 3% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GAM or BLK?
On trailing P/E, General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 25. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GAM or BLK?
Over the past 5 years, General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) delivered a total return of +95. 4%, compared to +35. 2% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +246. 4% versus GAM's +193. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GAM or BLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning BLK is approximately 74% more volatile than GAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 29% for BlackRock, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GAM or BLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is pulling ahead at 180. 6% versus 14. 3% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BlackRock, Inc. grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -36. 1% for General American Investors Company, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GAM or BLK?
General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is the more profitable company, earning 97. 5% net margin versus 31. 2% for BlackRock, Inc. — meaning it keeps 97. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAM leads at 97. 5% versus 37. 1% for BLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GAM leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GAM or BLK?
In this comparison, BLK (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. GAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GAM or BLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28), 1. 9% yield, +246. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLK: +246. 4%, GAM: +193. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GAM and BLK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BLK pays a dividend while GAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.