GAMB
Gambling.com Group Limited
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$155M
5Y Perf.-36.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GAMB vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+63.0%
GAMB vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GAMB | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $155M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $155M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 93.2% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $86.81B |
GAMB vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GAMB
AMZN
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gambling.com Group … (GAMB) | 100 | 63.1 | -36.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 163.0 | +63.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GAMB vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GAMB and AMZN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GAMB
Gambling.com Group Limited
The Income Pick
GAMB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.38
- Rev growth 17.1%, EPS growth 78.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 44.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 22.7%, current ratio 1.17x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs GAMB's -44.7%
- 12.2% margin vs GAMB's 1.2%
- +43.7% vs GAMB's -66.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GAMB | 17.1% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% |
| Value | GAMB | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 34.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs GAMB's 1.2% |
| Stability / Safety | GAMB | Beta 1.38 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +43.7% vs GAMB's -66.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs GAMB's 0.7%, ROIC 14.7% vs 23.0% |
GAMB vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
GAMB vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGAMBLAGGINGAMZN
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
1leads
GAMBGambling.com Group Li…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AMZNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GAMB6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GAMB6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GAMB and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 4807.0x GAMB's $155M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GAMB's 1.2%. On growth, GAMB holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GAMBGambling.com Grou… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $155M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.2% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -145.8% | +74.8% |
Evenly matched — GAMB and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GAMB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, GAMB trades at a 86% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GAMB's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | GAMBGambling.com Grou… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $155M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $170M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.26x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.63x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.09x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.77x | 378.98x |
GAMB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAMB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $1 for GAMB. GAMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GAMB scores 7/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GAMBGambling.com Grou… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 39.96x |
GAMB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,525 for GAMB. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs GAMB's -66.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs GAMB's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GAMBGambling.com Grou… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.4% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.9% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.7% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.7% | +36.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GAMB and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAMB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs GAMB's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GAMBGambling.com Grou… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.95 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.51 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.6% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 559K | 45.5M |
Evenly matched — GAMB and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GAMB as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for GAMB (target: $7) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | GAMBGambling.com Grou… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.4% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GAMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AMZN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallGambling.com Group Limited (GAMB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GAMB vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GAMB or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gambling.
com Group Limited (GAMB) is the stronger pick with 17. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GAMB or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Gambling.
com Group Limited (GAMB) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Gambling. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GAMB or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -44. 8% for Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus GAMB's -44. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GAMB or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gambling.
com Group Limited (GAMB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 38β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 10% more volatile than GAMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GAMB or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gambling.
com Group Limited (GAMB) is pulling ahead at 17. 1% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gambling. com Group Limited grew EPS 78. 7% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GAMB leads at 44. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GAMB or AMZN?
Gambling.
com Group Limited (GAMB) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 1% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAMB leads at 28. 1% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GAMB leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GAMB or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gambling.
com Group Limited (GAMB) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 26. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GAMB: 58. 4% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GAMB or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GAMB or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, GAMB: -44. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GAMB and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GAMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GAMB: 21.4% · AMZN: 16.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(GAMB: 5.3x · AMZN: 37.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.