Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GASS vs GLNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
GASS vs GLNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $370M | $5.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $173M | $394M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $66M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 46.9% |
| Operating Margin | 31.5% | 34.4% |
| Forward P/E | 6.0x | 68.8x |
| Total Debt | $105K | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $99M | $1.18B |
GASS vs GLNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| StealthGas Inc. (GASS) | 100 | 379.5 | +279.5% |
| Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) | 100 | 689.3 | +589.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GASS vs GLNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GASS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 9.30x
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 68.8x)
- 35.0% margin vs GLNG's 16.7%
GLNG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 5.5%
- Rev growth 51.1%, EPS growth 35.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 262.2% 10Y total return vs GASS's 129.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.1% revenue growth vs GASS's 3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 68.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs GLNG's 16.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs GASS's 0.52 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.8% vs GLNG's +38.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs GLNG's 1.2%, ROIC 6.8% vs 2.9% |
GASS vs GLNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GASS vs GLNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $394M annually — 2.3x GASS's $173M. GASS is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLNG's 16.7%. On growth, GLNG holds the edge at +101.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $173M | $394M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $80M | $185M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $66M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $84M | -$430M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +46.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.5% | +34.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.7% | -109.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +101.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GASS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, GASS trades at a 93% valuation discount to GLNG's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GASS's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLNG's 39.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $370M | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $271M | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.91x | 84.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.01x | 68.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.37x | 39.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 14.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 2.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.36x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GASS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GASS delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $3 for GLNG. GASS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLNG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLNG scores 8/9 vs GASS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$99M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $99M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104,801 | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.41x | 4.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GASS and GLNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLNG five years ago would be worth $51,436 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33,267 for GASS. Over the past 12 months, GASS leads with a +82.8% total return vs GLNG's +38.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GASS at 54.2% vs GLNG's 39.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.8% | +44.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.8% | +38.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +266.9% | +172.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +232.7% | +414.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.4% | +262.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.2% | +39.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GASS's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.52 | $57.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.22 | $35.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.9 | 72.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 178K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
GLNG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GASS as "Buy" and GLNG as "Buy". GLNG is the only dividend payer here at 5.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $53.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +2.5% |
GLNG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). GASS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GASS vs GLNG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GASS or GLNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the stronger pick with 51.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for StealthGas Inc. (GASS). StealthGas Inc. (GASS) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate StealthGas Inc. (GASS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GASS or GLNG?
On trailing P/E, StealthGas Inc.
(GASS) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus Golar LNG Limited at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, StealthGas Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GASS or GLNG?
Over the past 5 years, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) delivered a total return of +414.
4%, compared to +232. 7% for StealthGas Inc. (GASS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLNG returned +262. 2% versus GASS's +129. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GASS or GLNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus StealthGas Inc. 's 0. 52β — meaning GASS is approximately 169% more volatile than GLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, StealthGas Inc. (GASS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for Golar LNG Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GASS or GLNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is pulling ahead at 51.
1% versus 3. 5% for StealthGas Inc. (GASS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Golar LNG Limited grew EPS 35. 4% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for StealthGas Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLNG leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GASS or GLNG?
StealthGas Inc.
(GASS) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 0% net margin versus 16. 7% for Golar LNG Limited — meaning it keeps 35. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLNG leads at 34. 4% versus 31. 8% for GASS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLNG leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GASS or GLNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, StealthGas Inc.
(GASS) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 68. 8x for Golar LNG Limited — 62. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GASS or GLNG?
In this comparison, GLNG (5.
5% yield) pays a dividend. GASS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GASS or GLNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 5. 5% yield, +262. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLNG: +262. 2%, GASS: +129. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GASS and GLNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (GASS (Industrials) and GLNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GASS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLNG is a small-cap high-growth stock. GLNG pays a dividend while GASS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.