Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GBLI vs HRTG vs HIHO vs PLMR vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Staffing & Employment Services
GBLI vs HRTG vs HIHO vs PLMR vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $392M | $861M | $3M | $3.01B | $790M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $451M | $847M | $6M | $874M | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $34M | $196M | $-535K | $197M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 47.2% | 29.4% | 56.2% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 31.7% | -21.6% | 29.0% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 6.1x | 33.0x | 11.9x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $100M | $810K | $7M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $559M | $6M | $107M | $2M |
GBLI vs HRTG vs HIHO vs PLMR vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Gr… (GBLI) | 100 | 112.5 | +12.5% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 223.5 | +123.5% |
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 152.6 | +52.6% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GBLI vs HRTG vs HIHO vs PLMR vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GBLI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.14, yield 5.1%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.14 vs HIHO's 0.70, lower leverage
HRTG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 18.0x)
- 23.1% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
HIHO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 14.1% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
PLMR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 498.1% 10Y total return vs HRTG's 119.4%
- PEG 0.12 vs HRTG's 0.39
- 58.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +18.9% vs HIHO's -51.2%
- 9.2% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 19.1% vs -31.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 18.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.1% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs HIHO's 0.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.1% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs HIHO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 19.1% vs -31.7% |
GBLI vs HRTG vs HIHO vs PLMR vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GBLI vs HRTG vs HIHO vs PLMR vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRTG leads in 3 of 6 categories
GBLI leads 0 • HIHO leads 0 • PLMR leads 0 • KFRC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HRTG and PLMR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 216.4x HIHO's $6M. HRTG is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +62.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $451M | $847M | $6M | $874M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $281M | -$653,000 | $265M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $34M | $196M | -$535,000 | $197M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $177M | $0 | $406M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +47.2% | +29.4% | +56.2% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +31.7% | -21.6% | +29.0% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +23.1% | -8.7% | +22.6% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +20.8% | -6.2% | +46.4% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.5% | +2.4% | -44.3% | +62.8% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +196.7% | +2.3% | -2.5% | +59.7% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 87% valuation discount to HIHO's 33.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.06x vs PLMR's 0.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $392M | $861M | $3M | $3.0B | $790M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $335M | $402M | -$2M | $2.9B | $858M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.60x | 4.44x | 32.99x | 15.84x | 22.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.71x | 6.07x | — | 11.87x | 17.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.06x | — | 0.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.59x | 1.48x | -22.47x | 11.10x | 15.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 1.02x | 0.47x | 3.44x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 1.72x | 0.56x | 3.31x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.22x | 4.94x | — | 7.36x | 16.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 47.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. PLMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFRC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HRTG scores 7/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +47.3% | -9.0% | +22.8% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +8.4% | -6.4% | +7.6% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +15.4% | -31.7% | +25.5% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +11.1% | -7.7% | +11.3% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.20x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$57M | -$459M | -$5M | -$100M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $559M | $6M | $107M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $100M | $810,000 | $7M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.91x | 33.88x | — | 649.06x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,296 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +18.9% total return vs HIHO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 89.9% vs HIHO's -18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.8% | +2.7% | -42.0% | -13.8% | +39.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.7% | +15.3% | -51.2% | -27.6% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.6% | +585.3% | -45.4% | +124.0% | -13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.5% | +201.4% | -57.0% | +68.0% | -16.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.7% | +119.4% | -41.1% | +498.1% | +195.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +89.9% | -18.3% | +30.8% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GBLI and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GBLI is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIHO's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 36.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 0.50x | 0.70x | 0.24x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.00 | $31.98 | $2.21 | $175.85 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.63 | $16.83 | $0.74 | $107.75 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.3% | +87.6% | +36.0% | +64.6% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 55.7 | 47.4 | 27.9 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 282K | 60K | 234K | 305K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIHO and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRTG as "Buy", PLMR as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -2.9% for PLMR (target: $110). For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.06% vs KFRC's 3.58%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.00 | — | $110.25 | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | — | 11 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | — | +14.1% | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | — | $0.11 | — | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +6.4% |
HRTG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
GBLI vs HRTG vs HIHO vs PLMR vs KFRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 33. 0x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Palomar Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to -57. 0% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLMR returned +498. 1% versus HIHO's -41. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
14β versus Highway Holdings Limited's 0. 70β — meaning HIHO is approximately 405% more volatile than GBLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 56% for Kforce Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Global Indemnity Group, LLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC?
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus 1. 4% for Highway Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRTG leads at 30. 6% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLMR leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC?
In this comparison, HIHO (14.
1% yield), GBLI (5. 1% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield) pay a dividend. HRTG, PLMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GBLI or HRTG or HIHO or PLMR or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
14), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GBLI: +17. 7%, HRTG: +119. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GBLI and HRTG and HIHO and PLMR and KFRC?
These companies operate in different sectors (GBLI (Financial Services) and HRTG (Financial Services) and HIHO (Industrials) and PLMR (Financial Services) and KFRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GBLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. GBLI, HIHO, KFRC pay a dividend while HRTG, PLMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.