Railroads
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GBX vs TRN vs RAIL vs WAB vs TT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
Railroads
Railroads
Construction
GBX vs TRN vs RAIL vs WAB vs TT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Railroads | Railroads | Railroads | Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.56B | $2.93B | $254M | $45.09B | $103.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.06B | $2.06B | $469M | $11.51B | $21.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $185M | $255M | $29M | $1.21B | $2.90B |
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | 27.0% | 14.8% | 33.8% | 35.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 16.6% | 6.3% | 16.1% | 18.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 18.8x | 16.3x | 25.0x | 31.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.84B | $5.44B | $152M | $5.54B | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $326M | $201M | $64M | $789M | $1.76B |
GBX vs TRN vs RAIL vs WAB vs TT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Greenbrier Comp… (GBX) | 100 | 237.6 | +137.6% |
| Trinity Industries,… (TRN) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
| FreightCar America,… (RAIL) | 100 | 665.0 | +565.0% |
| Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
| Trane Technologies … (TT) | 100 | 520.8 | +420.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GBX vs TRN vs RAIL vs WAB vs TT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GBX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, current ratio 2.80x
- PEG 0.47 vs TT's 1.06
- Beta 0.97, yield 2.4%, current ratio 2.80x
- Lower P/E (16.0x vs 31.7x), PEG 0.47 vs 1.06
TRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 3.2%
- 3.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +57.0% vs TT's +16.3%
Among these 5 stocks, RAIL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 7.5% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0%
TT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs WAB's 247.1%
- 13.4% margin vs GBX's 6.0%
- 13.4% ROA vs TRN's 3.0%, ROIC 26.2% vs 4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 31.7x), PEG 0.47 vs 1.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs GBX's 6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs RAIL's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs TT's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs TRN's 3.0%, ROIC 26.2% vs 4.1% |
GBX vs TRN vs RAIL vs WAB vs TT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GBX vs TRN vs RAIL vs WAB vs TT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TT leads in 2 of 6 categories
GBX leads 1 • TRN leads 1 • RAIL leads 0 • WAB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TT is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.6B annually — 46.1x RAIL's $469M. TT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GBX's 6.0%. On growth, WAB holds the edge at +13.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $2.1B | $469M | $11.5B | $21.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $413M | $646M | $34M | $2.3B | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $185M | $255M | $29M | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $123M | -$283M | $14M | $1.6B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +27.0% | +14.8% | +33.8% | +35.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +16.6% | +6.3% | +16.1% | +18.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +12.4% | +6.2% | +10.5% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -13.7% | +3.1% | +14.3% | +14.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.3% | -16.0% | -33.2% | +13.0% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.7% | +15.4% | -24.3% | +12.8% | -1.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GBX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, RAIL trades at a 81% valuation discount to WAB's 38.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBX offers better value at 0.23x vs WAB's 1.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.9B | $254M | $45.1B | $104.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $8.2B | $342M | $49.8B | $106.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.94x | 12.01x | 7.32x | 38.90x | 36.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.01x | 18.79x | 16.29x | 25.05x | 31.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.23x | — | — | 1.51x | 1.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.69x | 12.31x | 8.52x | 21.03x | 25.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 1.36x | 0.51x | 4.04x | 4.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 2.65x | — | 4.06x | 12.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.08x | 30.08x | 36.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TT delivers a 34.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $11 for GBX. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRN's 4.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TT scores 9/9 vs WAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +21.3% | — | +10.9% | +34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +3.0% | +9.4% | +5.6% | +13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +4.1% | — | +9.6% | +26.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +4.7% | +19.5% | +11.7% | +27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 4.75x | — | 0.50x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $5.2B | $88M | $4.8B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $326M | $201M | $64M | $789M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $5.4B | $152M | $5.5B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.87x | 1.29x | -0.57x | 7.41x | 17.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TRN and RAIL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $32,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,466 for GBX. Over the past 12 months, TRN leads with a +57.0% total return vs TT's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAIL at 40.7% vs TRN's 23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.0% | +38.3% | -27.0% | +23.0% | +18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.6% | +57.0% | +30.8% | +40.6% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.8% | +88.1% | +178.5% | +170.1% | +171.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.7% | +40.2% | +24.9% | +229.0% | +164.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.7% | +261.3% | -37.0% | +247.1% | +874.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +23.4% | +40.7% | +39.3% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GBX and TRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RAIL's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRN currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs RAIL's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.97x | 2.06x | 1.11x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.19 | $37.27 | $14.90 | $275.84 | $503.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.23 | $22.38 | $6.02 | $184.26 | $348.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +98.3% | +53.6% | +96.3% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 64.1 | 36.1 | 58.7 | 62.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 405K | 575K | 198K | 905K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
TRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GBX as "Buy", TRN as "Hold", RAIL as "Hold", WAB as "Buy", TT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for TT (target: $519) vs -4.5% for TRN (target: $35). For income investors, TRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs WAB's 0.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $35.00 | — | $291.00 | $518.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 25 | 13 | 34 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +3.2% | — | +0.4% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.23 | $1.19 | — | $1.01 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +1.4% |
TT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GBX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GBX vs TRN vs RAIL vs WAB vs TT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the stronger pick with 7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT?
On trailing P/E, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) is the cheapest at 7. 3x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus Trane Technologies plc's 1. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT?
Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +229.
0%, compared to +14. 7% for The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TT returned +874. 8% versus RAIL's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
(GBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus FreightCar America, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning RAIL is approximately 113% more volatile than GBX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 5% for Trinity Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is pulling ahead at 7.
5% versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FreightCar America, Inc. grew EPS 134. 9% year-over-year, compared to 13. 1% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RAIL leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT?
Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus 6. 3% for The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TT leads at 18. 6% versus 6. 8% for RAIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TT leads at 36. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus Trane Technologies plc's 1. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 31. 7x for Trane Technologies plc — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TT: 10. 4% to $518. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT?
In this comparison, TRN (3.
2% yield), GBX (2. 4% yield), TT (0. 8% yield), WAB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RAIL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GBX or TRN or RAIL or WAB or TT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97), 0. 8% yield, +874. 8% 10Y return). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TT: +874. 8%, RAIL: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GBX and TRN and RAIL and WAB and TT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GBX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRN is a small-cap deep-value stock; RAIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GBX, TRN, TT pay a dividend while RAIL, WAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.