Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GDC vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
GDC vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $9M | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.4% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23K | $22M |
GDC vs GFAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GD Culture Group Li… (GDC) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GDC vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 100.0%, EPS growth 62.6%
- 100.0% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2%
- 0.3% margin vs GFAI's -32.9%
GFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 2.31
- -99.5% 10Y total return vs GDC's -99.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.31, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 4.92x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs GFAI's -32.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.31 vs GDC's 3.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -53.2% vs GDC's -93.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC -198.9% vs -41.6% |
GDC vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GFAI and GDC operate at a comparable scale, with $72M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +38.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GFAI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | -$9M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.10x | -0.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 547.10x | 0.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GFAI leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GDC delivers a 3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GDC's 769.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs GDC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -198.9% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -188.0% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 769.88x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22,538 | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -167.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GFAI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GFAI five years ago would be worth $46 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16 for GDC. Over the past 12 months, GFAI leads with a -53.2% total return vs GDC's -93.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GFAI at -60.4% vs GDC's -70.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -96.7% | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.6% | -53.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -93.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.9% | -60.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GFAI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GFAI is the less volatile stock with a 2.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GDC's 3.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GFAI currently trades 31.5% from its 52-week high vs GDC's 1.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.04x | 2.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.91 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.5% | +31.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GFAI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GDC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
GDC vs GFAI: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — GDC or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) delivered a total return of -99. 5%, compared to -99. 8% for GD Culture Group Limited (GDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GFAI returned -99. 5% versus GDC's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — GDC or GFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 31β versus GD Culture Group Limited's 3. 04β — meaning GDC is approximately 32% more volatile than GFAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 770% for GD Culture Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — GDC or GFAI?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to 62. 6% for GD Culture Group Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — GDC or GFAI?
GD Culture Group Limited (GDC) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -16. 1% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDC leads at 0. 0% versus -18. 5% for GFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GFAI leads at 17. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — GDC or GFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is GDC or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. GD Culture Group Limited (GDC) carries a higher beta of 3. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GFAI: -99. 5%, GDC: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between GDC and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (GDC (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.