Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GEL vs SOC vs OXY vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
GEL vs SOC vs OXY vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $1.84T | $53.66B | $32.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.68B | $1M | $23.18B | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $-498M | $4.71B | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | -8.7% | 26.2% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -367.6% | 12.4% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 7.9x | 11.4x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.05B | $0.00 | $23.96B | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $98M | $1.99B | $2.21B |
GEL vs SOC vs OXY vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) | 100 | 178.1 | +78.1% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 209.1 | +109.1% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GEL vs SOC vs OXY vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GEL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.32, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.32 vs SOC's 1.51
SOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs OXY's -7.7%
- 9.5% revenue growth vs GEL's -45.0%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 17.1x)
OXY is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 20.3% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -3.3%, EPS growth -47.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- +105.6% vs SOC's -36.8%
- 6.1% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs -44.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs GEL's -45.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs OXY's 3.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.6% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs -44.6% |
GEL vs SOC vs OXY vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GEL vs SOC vs OXY vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OXY leads in 2 of 6 categories
HAL leads 1 • GEL leads 0 • SOC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OXY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OXY is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.2B annually — 18240.8x SOC's $1M. OXY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, GEL holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $1M | $23.2B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $550M | -$454M | $10.6B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | -$498M | $4.7B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $209M | -$611M | $3.6B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | -8.7% | +26.2% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | -367.6% | +12.4% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | -391.5% | +20.3% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | -480.4% | +15.4% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | — | -23.1% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.9% | -5.4% | +3.1% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
OXY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.1x trailing earnings, HAL trades at a 22% valuation discount to OXY's 33.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OXY's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HAL's 11.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $1.84T | $53.7B | $32.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $1.84T | $75.6B | $38.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.56x | -3.07x | 33.51x | 26.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.72x | 7.88x | 11.38x | 17.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.31x | — | 6.66x | 11.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | — | 2.49x | 1.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.85x | 2359.43x | 1.47x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.83x | — | 13.07x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. OXY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.65x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GEL's 4.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAL scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | -113.8% | +12.6% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | -28.9% | +5.6% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | -44.6% | +4.7% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | -37.5% | +4.9% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.30x | — | 0.65x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | -$98M | $22.0B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $98M | $2.0B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $0 | $24.0B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.97x | -2.28x | 3.25x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GEL and HAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OXY five years ago would be worth $20,927 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +105.6% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEL at 23.2% vs OXY's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | +9.5% | +27.9% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.5% | -36.8% | +40.8% | +105.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +26.5% | -4.0% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +32.6% | +109.3% | +82.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | +32.4% | -7.7% | +16.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +8.2% | -1.4% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OXY and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OXY is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAL currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 1.42x | -0.25x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.64 | $35.00 | $67.45 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.21 | $3.72 | $38.72 | $19.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +36.7% | +80.0% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.4 | 45.8 | 41.5 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 246K | 5.4M | 17.2M | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GEL and OXY and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEL as "Buy", SOC as "Buy", OXY as "Buy", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for SOC (target: $28) vs 1.3% for HAL (target: $40). For income investors, GEL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs HAL's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $28.00 | $60.08 | $39.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 4 | 52 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | — | +3.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.66 | — | $1.59 | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
OXY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HAL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GEL vs SOC vs OXY vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger pick with -3.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). Halliburton Company (HAL) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E (17. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL?
On trailing P/E, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the cheapest at 26.
1x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) delivered a total return of +109.
3%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 5% versus OXY's -8. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
25β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 42β — meaning SOC is approximately -663% more volatile than OXY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 65% versus 4% for Genesis Energy, L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halliburton Company (HAL) is pulling ahead at -3.
3% versus -45. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genesis Energy, L. P. grew EPS 41. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAL leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL?
Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
0% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OXY leads at 17. 2% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OXY leads at 33. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Genesis Energy, L. P. — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 118. 1% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL?
In this comparison, GEL (4.
0% yield), OXY (3. 0% yield), HAL (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GEL or SOC or OXY or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
25), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OXY: -8. 9%, SOC: +32. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GEL and SOC and OXY and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GEL, OXY, HAL pay a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.