GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$41.20B
5Y Perf.+51.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GFS vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
Semiconductors
Market Cap$4.78T
5Y Perf.+668.5%
GFS vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GFS | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $41.20B | $4.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.79B | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $885M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 25.2% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 40.2x | 23.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.81B | $10.61B |
GFS vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GFS
NVDA
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) | 100 | 151.9 | +51.9% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 768.5 | +668.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GFS vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NVDA leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
The Momentum Pick
GFS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +106.4% vs NVDA's +72.7%
Best for: momentum
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
The Income Pick
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 224.0% 10Y total return vs GFS's 59.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NVDA | 65.5% revenue growth vs GFS's 0.6% |
| Value | NVDA | Lower P/E (23.7x vs 40.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | NVDA | 55.6% margin vs GFS's 13.0% |
| Stability / Safety | NVDA | Beta 1.73 vs GFS's 1.85, lower leverage |
| Dividends | NVDA | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GFS | +106.4% vs NVDA's +72.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs GFS's 5.3%, ROIC 81.8% vs 5.3% |
GFS vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2026
GFS vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNVDALAGGINGGFS
GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
1leads
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GFSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NVDA5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GFS4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NVDA5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NVDA4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 31.8x GFS's $6.8B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFS's 13.0%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $885M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.3% | +97.8% |
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.1x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 14% valuation discount to GFS's 46.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GFS's 19.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 35.9x.
| Metric | GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41.2B | $4.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41.0B | $4.78T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.57x | 40.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.19x | 23.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.42x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.43x | 35.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.07x | 22.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.45x | 30.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.83x | 49.40x |
GFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $8 for GFS. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GFS's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFS scores 7/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.6% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$171M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 545.03x |
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $135,979 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,957 for GFS. Over the past 12 months, GFS leads with a +106.4% total return vs NVDA's +72.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 90.0% vs GFS's 7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +100.8% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +106.4% | +72.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.6% | +585.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.6% | +1259.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.6% | +22397.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.6% | +90.0% |
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GFS and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFS's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GFS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs NVDA's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.36 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.51 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.4 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 166.0M |
Evenly matched — GFS and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GFS as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.9% upside for NVDA (target: $279) vs -30.9% for GFS (target: $51).
| Metric | GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.14 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GFS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallNVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GFS vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GFS or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 40. 1x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GFS or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 40.
1x versus GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. at 46. 6x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 23. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GFS or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1260%, compared to +59.
6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +224. 0% versus GFS's +59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GFS or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning GFS is approximately 7% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 14% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GFS or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 0. 6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. grew EPS 431. 3% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GFS or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus 13. 0% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 11. 7% for GFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GFS or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 23.
7x forward P/E versus 40. 2x for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 41. 9% to $278. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — GFS or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GFS or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+224.
0% 10Y return). GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +224. 0%, GFS: +59. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GFS and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GFS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GFS: 0.0% · NVDA: 73.2%)Net Margin>
%
(GFS: 13.0% · NVDA: 55.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(GFS: 46.6x · NVDA: 40.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.