Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GGB vs CMC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GGB
Gerdau S.A.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNYSE • BR
Market Cap$9.53B
5Y Perf.+140.1%
CMC
Commercial Metals Company

Steel

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.83B
5Y Perf.+310.8%

GGB vs CMC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GGB logoGGB
CMC logoCMC
IndustrySteelSteel
Market Cap$9.53B$7.83B
Revenue (TTM)$69.86B$8.01B
Net Income (TTM)$1.39B$438M
Gross Margin11.4%16.5%
Operating Margin8.4%7.5%
Forward P/E1.9x10.8x
Total Debt$15.57B$1.35B
Cash & Equiv.$5.93B$1.04B

GGB vs CMCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GGB
CMC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Gerdau S.A. (GGB)100240.1+140.1%
Commercial Metals C… (CMC)100410.8+310.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GGB vs CMC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GGB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Commercial Metals Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
The Income Pick

GGB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 2.7%
  • Rev growth 4.2%, EPS growth -68.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 2.89x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
The Long-Run Compounder

CMC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 356.4% 10Y total return vs GGB's 331.7%
  • 5.5% margin vs GGB's 2.0%
  • 4.7% ROA vs GGB's 1.6%, ROIC 8.5% vs 6.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGGB logoGGB4.2% revenue growth vs CMC's -1.6%
ValueGGB logoGGBLower P/E (1.9x vs 10.8x)
Quality / MarginsCMC logoCMC5.5% margin vs GGB's 2.0%
Stability / SafetyGGB logoGGBBeta 1.31 vs CMC's 1.53, lower leverage
DividendsGGB logoGGB2.7% yield, vs CMC's 1.0%
Momentum (1Y)GGB logoGGB+93.9% vs CMC's +58.2%
Efficiency (ROA)CMC logoCMC4.7% ROA vs GGB's 1.6%, ROIC 8.5% vs 6.8%

GGB vs CMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GGBGerdau S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

CMCCommercial Metals Company
FY 2025
Steel Products
42.2%$3.3B
Downstream Products
29.3%$2.3B
Raw Material Products
17.0%$1.3B
Other Product
4.2%$326M
Construction Products
3.9%$304M
Ground Stabilization Products
3.4%$262M

GGB vs CMC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMCLAGGINGGGB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

GGB is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.9B annually — 8.7x CMC's $8.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.5% (CMC) to 2.0% (GGB). On growth, CMC holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69.9B$8.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9.5B$890M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.4B$438M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.2B$296M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.4%+16.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.4%+7.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.0%+5.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.7%+3.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.9%+11.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-144.6%+2.0%
CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GGB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 34.1x trailing earnings, GGB trades at a 64% valuation discount to CMC's 95.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GGB's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMC's 10.1x.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Market CapShares × price$9.5B$7.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.5B$8.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS34.10x95.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.86x10.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.97x10.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.68x1.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.88x1.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.11x25.06x
GGB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CMC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMC delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for GGB. GGB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMC's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GGB scores 5/9 vs CMC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.5%+10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+8.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.9%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9.6B$311M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5.9B$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15.6B$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.47x9.84x
CMC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CMC five years ago would be worth $22,730 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,451 for GGB. Over the past 12 months, GGB leads with a +93.9% total return vs CMC's +58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMC at 17.9% vs GGB's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.3%-1.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+93.9%+58.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.5%+63.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.5%+127.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+331.7%+356.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.4%+17.9%
CMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GGB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GGB is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMC's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GGB currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs CMC's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.31x1.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.98$84.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.49$44.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.4%+83.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10079.863.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded18.4M1.1M
GGB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GGB and CMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates GGB as "Buy" and CMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.4% upside for CMC (target: $83) vs 10.5% for GGB (target: $5). For income investors, GGB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.72% vs CMC's 1.01%.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.25$82.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts1026
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises04
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.64$0.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.5%+2.7%
Evenly matched — GGB and CMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CMC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GGB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallCommercial Metals Company (CMC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GGB vs CMC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GGB or CMC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) is the stronger pick with 4. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Gerdau S. A. (GGB) offers the better valuation at 34. 1x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gerdau S. A. (GGB) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GGB or CMC?

On trailing P/E, Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) is the cheapest at 34. 1x versus Commercial Metals Company at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, Gerdau S. A. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GGB or CMC?

Over the past 5 years, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) delivered a total return of +127.

3%, compared to +14. 5% for Gerdau S. A. (GGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMC returned +356. 4% versus GGB's +331. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GGB or CMC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Commercial Metals Company's 1. 53β — meaning CMC is approximately 17% more volatile than GGB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gerdau S. A. (GGB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 32% for Commercial Metals Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GGB or CMC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) is pulling ahead at 4. 2% versus -1. 6% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gerdau S. A. grew EPS -68. 3% year-over-year, compared to -82. 1% for Commercial Metals Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMC leads at -4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GGB or CMC?

Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 0% net margin versus 1. 1% for Commercial Metals Company — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GGB leads at 8. 4% versus 6. 7% for CMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMC leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GGB or CMC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for Commercial Metals Company — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMC: 17. 4% to $82. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GGB or CMC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Gerdau S. A. (GGB) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 0% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC).

09

Is GGB or CMC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 7% yield, +331. 7% 10Y return). Commercial Metals Company (CMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GGB: +331. 7%, CMC: +356. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GGB and CMC?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

GGB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GGB and CMC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GGB: 0.9% · CMC: 11.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GGB: 34.1x · CMC: 95.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.