Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GGB vs RS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GGB
Gerdau S.A.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNYSE • BR
Market Cap$9.53B
5Y Perf.+140.1%
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$18.87B
5Y Perf.+280.6%

GGB vs RS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GGB logoGGB
RS logoRS
IndustrySteelSteel
Market Cap$9.53B$18.87B
Revenue (TTM)$69.86B$14.84B
Net Income (TTM)$1.39B$806M
Gross Margin11.4%27.2%
Operating Margin8.4%7.5%
Forward P/E1.9x18.9x
Total Debt$15.57B$1.99B
Cash & Equiv.$5.93B$217M

GGB vs RSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GGB
RS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Gerdau S.A. (GGB)100240.1+140.1%
Reliance Steel & Al… (RS)100380.6+280.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GGB vs RS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GGB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
The Growth Play

GGB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 4.2%, EPS growth -68.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.4%
  • 4.2% revenue growth vs RS's 3.3%
  • Lower P/E (1.9x vs 18.9x)
Best for: growth exposure
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
The Income Pick

RS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.3%
  • 463.7% 10Y total return vs GGB's 331.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 4.88x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGGB logoGGB4.2% revenue growth vs RS's 3.3%
ValueGGB logoGGBLower P/E (1.9x vs 18.9x)
Quality / MarginsRS logoRS5.4% margin vs GGB's 2.0%
Stability / SafetyRS logoRSBeta 0.75 vs GGB's 1.31, lower leverage
DividendsGGB logoGGB2.7% yield, vs RS's 1.3%
Momentum (1Y)GGB logoGGB+93.9% vs RS's +25.8%
Efficiency (ROA)RS logoRS7.6% ROA vs GGB's 1.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs 6.8%

GGB vs RS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GGBGerdau S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
FY 2025
Carbon steel
62.6%$7.9B
Aluminum
19.6%$2.5B
Stainless steel
15.4%$1.9B
Other and eliminations
2.4%$306M

GGB vs RS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRSLAGGINGGGB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

GGB is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.9B annually — 4.7x RS's $14.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.4% (RS) to 2.0% (GGB). On growth, RS holds the edge at +15.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69.9B$14.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9.5B$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.4B$806M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.2B$612M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.4%+27.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.4%+7.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.0%+5.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.7%+4.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.9%+15.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-144.6%+36.4%
RS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GGB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 26.4x trailing earnings, RS trades at a 23% valuation discount to GGB's 34.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GGB's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RS's 15.9x.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
Market CapShares × price$9.5B$18.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.5B$20.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS34.10x26.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.86x18.94x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.97x15.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.68x1.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.88x2.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.11x37.55x
GGB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

RS delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $3 for GGB. RS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GGB's 0.29x.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.5%+11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+7.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.9%+11.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9.6B$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5.9B$217M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15.6B$2.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.47x18.77x
RS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RS five years ago would be worth $21,957 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,451 for GGB. Over the past 12 months, GGB leads with a +93.9% total return vs RS's +25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RS at 16.7% vs GGB's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.3%+25.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+93.9%+25.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.5%+58.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.5%+119.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+331.7%+463.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.4%+16.7%
RS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RS is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GGB's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.31x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.98$381.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.49$260.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.4%+96.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10079.879.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded18.4M313K
RS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GGB and RS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates GGB as "Buy" and RS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for GGB (target: $5) vs -1.9% for RS (target: $362). For income investors, GGB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.72% vs RS's 1.30%.

MetricGGB logoGGBGerdau S.A.RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.25$362.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1027
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises023
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.64$4.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.5%+3.1%
Evenly matched — GGB and RS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

RS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallReliance Steel & Aluminum C… (RS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GGB vs RS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GGB or RS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) is the stronger pick with 4. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (18. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gerdau S. A. (GGB) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GGB or RS?

On trailing P/E, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus Gerdau S. A. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Gerdau S. A. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GGB or RS?

Over the past 5 years, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) delivered a total return of +119. 6%, compared to +14. 5% for Gerdau S. A. (GGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RS returned +463. 7% versus GGB's +331. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GGB or RS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Gerdau S. A. 's 1. 31β — meaning GGB is approximately 75% more volatile than RS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 29% for Gerdau S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GGB or RS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) is pulling ahead at 4. 2% versus 3. 3% for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. grew EPS -10. 2% year-over-year, compared to -68. 3% for Gerdau S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GGB leads at -5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GGB or RS?

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 2% net margin versus 2. 0% for Gerdau S. A. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GGB leads at 8. 4% versus 7. 2% for RS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RS leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GGB or RS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Gerdau S.

A. (GGB) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GGB: 10. 5% to $5. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GGB or RS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Gerdau S. A. (GGB) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 3% for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS).

09

Is GGB or RS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 3% yield, +463. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RS: +463. 7%, GGB: +331. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GGB and RS?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

GGB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GGB and RS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GGB: 0.9% · RS: 15.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GGB: 34.1x · RS: 26.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.