GHG vs WH

For growth investors, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(WH) is the stronger pick with 1. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -88. 6% for GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG). Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) offers the better valuation at 33. 9x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(WH) is the cheapest at 33. 9x versus GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. at 35. 8x. On forward P/E, GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(WH) delivered a total return of +21. 8%, compared to -80. 0% for GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WH returned +43. 8% versus GHG's -75. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.

(GHG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning WH is approximately 40% more volatile than GHG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 7% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(WH) is pulling ahead at 1. 5% versus -88. 6% for GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS -31. 6% year-over-year, compared to -78. 7% for GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WH leads at -1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.

(GHG) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 13. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WH leads at 28. 4% versus 10. 5% for GHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WH leads at 58. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.

(GHG) trades at 0. 3x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GHG: 313. 2% to $5. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 2. 0% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH).

For long-horizon retirement investors, GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.

(GHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58), 5. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHG: -75. 5%, WH: +43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GHG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.