Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GIFI vs KFRC vs HWKN vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Chemicals - Specialty
Staffing & Employment Services
GIFI vs KFRC vs HWKN vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Staffing & Employment Services | Chemicals - Specialty | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $192M | $794M | $3.47B | $355M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $167M | $1.33B | $1.06B | $3.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $35M | $82M | $-266M |
| Gross Margin | 13.4% | 27.2% | 22.9% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 3.8% | 11.5% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 22.0x | 18.1x | 42.4x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $70M | $160M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $2M | $5M | $33M |
GIFI vs KFRC vs HWKN vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gulf Island Fabrica… (GIFI) | 100 | 401.3 | +301.3% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
| Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) | 100 | 662.3 | +562.3% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GIFI vs KFRC vs HWKN vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GIFI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 158.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 20.4%, current ratio 4.93x
- Beta 0.20 vs KELYA's 0.96
- +93.5% vs KELYA's -18.8%
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.46, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0%
HWKN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 196.8%
- 6.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 7.8% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 42.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 42.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs KELYA's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.5% vs KELYA's -18.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
GIFI vs KFRC vs HWKN vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GIFI vs KFRC vs HWKN vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories
KELYA leads 1 • GIFI leads 1 • KFRC leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWKN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 18.5x GIFI's $167M. HWKN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, GIFI holds the edge at +36.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $167M | $1.3B | $1.1B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $56M | $172M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $35M | $82M | -$266M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $43M | $88M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +27.2% | +22.9% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +3.8% | +11.5% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +2.6% | +7.8% | -8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +3.3% | +8.2% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.9% | +0.1% | +7.9% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.2% | +2.2% | -4.2% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, GIFI trades at a 67% valuation discount to HWKN's 41.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GIFI's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HWKN's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192M | $794M | $3.5B | $355M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $184M | $862M | $3.6B | $481M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.64x | 22.17x | 41.48x | -1.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.00x | 18.05x | 42.35x | 11.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.72x | 15.50x | 22.76x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 0.60x | 3.56x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.16x | 6.20x | 7.60x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.88x | 16.97x | 49.53x | 3.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GIFI and KFRC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFRC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GIFI scores 8/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +27.2% | +15.9% | -24.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.2% | +9.2% | +8.4% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.6% | +19.1% | +15.9% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.7% | +20.1% | +19.3% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.56x | 0.35x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $68M | $155M | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $2M | $5M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $70M | $160M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.04x | — | 10.27x | -12.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $50,906 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,269 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, GIFI leads with a +93.5% total return vs KELYA's -18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 61.2% vs KELYA's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | +40.0% | +15.2% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +93.5% | +13.6% | +40.6% | -18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +247.8% | -13.4% | +319.2% | -33.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.2% | -15.0% | +409.1% | -57.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.2% | +196.8% | +766.7% | -32.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.5% | -4.7% | +61.2% | -12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GIFI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KELYA's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GIFI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 66.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.46x | 0.94x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $47.48 | $186.15 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.05 | $24.49 | $115.35 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +91.5% | +89.8% | +66.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.7 | 67.5 | 62.7 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 301K | 168K | 364K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GIFI as "Hold", KFRC as "Hold", HWKN as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.4% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 52.0% for KELYA (target: $15). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.56% vs HWKN's 0.42%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 | — | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.6% | +0.4% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 | $0.70 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +6.4% | +0.7% | +3.5% |
HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GIFI vs KFRC vs HWKN vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. (GIFI) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (22. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA?
On trailing P/E, Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.
(GIFI) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Hawkins, Inc. at 41. 5x. On forward P/E, Kelly Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) delivered a total return of +409. 1%, compared to -57. 3% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +766. 7% versus KELYA's -32. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.
(GIFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Kelly Services, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning KELYA is approximately 378% more volatile than GIFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 56% for Kforce Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. grew EPS 158. 3% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIFI leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA?
Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.
(GIFI) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 3% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWKN leads at 12. 2% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFRC leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 42. 4x for Hawkins, Inc. — 31. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 63. 4% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield), HWKN (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GIFI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GIFI or KFRC or HWKN or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 3. 6% yield, +196. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +196. 8%, KELYA: -32. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GIFI and KFRC and HWKN and KELYA?
These companies operate in different sectors (GIFI (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and HWKN (Basic Materials) and KELYA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GIFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KFRC, KELYA pay a dividend while GIFI, HWKN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.