REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GIPR vs NTST vs ADC vs FCPT vs NNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
GIPR vs NTST vs ADC vs FCPT vs NNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1.70B | $9.17B | $2.80B | $8.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $176M | $750M | $301M | $936M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $185K | $220M | $117M | $387M |
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 92.4% | 87.6% | 98.0% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | -66.7% | 27.7% | 48.0% | 56.0% | 63.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 64.8x | 38.9x | 21.8x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $0.00 | $3.35B | $1.21B | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $613K | $14M | $16M | $12M | $5M |
GIPR vs NTST vs ADC vs FCPT vs NNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Income P… (GIPR) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 107.4 | +7.4% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GIPR vs NTST vs ADC vs FCPT vs NNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GIPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.73, yield 100.0%, current ratio 1.15x
- 100.0% yield, vs NNN's 5.3%
NTST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- PEG 1.11 vs NNN's 1.94
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
- PEG 1.11 vs 118.24
ADC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 135.6% 10Y total return vs FCPT's 99.1%
FCPT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
NNN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 41.4% margin vs GIPR's -103.2%
- 4.1% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.8% vs -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | PEG 1.11 vs 118.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs GIPR's -103.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs GIPR's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs NNN's 5.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs GIPR's -83.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.8% vs -4.0% |
GIPR vs NTST vs ADC vs FCPT vs NNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GIPR vs NTST vs ADC vs FCPT vs NNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GIPR leads in 1 of 6 categories
NNN leads 1 • NTST leads 1 • ADC leads 0 • FCPT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NTST and FCPT and NNN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN is the larger business by revenue, generating $936M annually — 94.0x GIPR's $10M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIPR's -103.2%. On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $176M | $750M | $301M | $936M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $133M | $638M | $231M | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $185,000 | $220M | $117M | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $654,400 | $106M | $110M | $188M | $464M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.1% | +92.4% | +87.6% | +98.0% | +81.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -66.7% | +27.7% | +48.0% | +56.0% | +63.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -103.2% | +0.1% | +29.3% | +38.7% | +41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +59.9% | +14.7% | +62.5% | +49.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +27.7% | +18.7% | +9.4% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +110.6% | +19.0% | +7.7% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GIPR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 92% valuation discount to NTST's 254.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 1.93x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1.7B | $9.2B | $2.8B | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $1.7B | $12.5B | $4.0B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | 254.50x | 43.12x | 23.37x | 21.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 64.78x | 38.94x | 21.81x | 21.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.35x | 113.70x | 118.24x | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.34x | 20.30x | 17.81x | 15.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 8.72x | 12.76x | 9.51x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 1.18x | 1.35x | 1.61x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.39x | 15.52x | 18.18x | 14.54x | 12.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GIPR. ADC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GIPR's 2.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCPT scores 7/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.2% | +0.0% | +3.7% | +7.4% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | +0.0% | +2.3% | +4.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +2.1% | +2.8% | +4.5% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +2.1% | +3.8% | +6.0% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.14x | — | 0.53x | 0.74x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | -$14M | $3.3B | $1.2B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $612,939 | $14M | $16M | $12M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $0 | $3.4B | $1.2B | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | — | 2.54x | 3.17x | 2.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADC five years ago would be worth $12,927 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,333 for GIPR. Over the past 12 months, NTST leads with a +32.6% total return vs GIPR's -83.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTST at 8.3% vs GIPR's -42.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.4% | +15.8% | +7.3% | +11.2% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.8% | +32.6% | +4.3% | -3.0% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +27.0% | +26.1% | +14.0% | +15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.7% | +14.9% | +29.3% | +17.2% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +40.7% | +135.6% | +99.1% | +37.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.5% | +8.3% | +8.0% | +4.5% | +4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADC and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIPR's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs GIPR's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.05x | -0.14x | 0.14x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.99 | $21.30 | $82.08 | $28.14 | $46.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.23 | $15.24 | $69.56 | $22.78 | $38.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.1% | +95.6% | +93.0% | +90.5% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 57.7 | 46.8 | 55.6 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.2M | 1.1M | 658K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GIPR and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTST as "Buy", ADC as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold", NNN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for ADC (target: $84) vs 3.5% for NNN (target: $46). For income investors, GIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 99.97% vs ADC's 4.01%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.03 | $83.50 | $27.00 | $46.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 32 | 15 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +4.1% | +4.0% | +5.5% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $0.83 | $3.06 | $1.40 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GIPR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NNN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GIPR vs NTST vs ADC vs FCPT vs NNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 5x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 11x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN?
Over the past 5 years, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) delivered a total return of +29.
3%, compared to -76. 7% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADC returned +135. 6% versus GIPR's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Generation Income Properties, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GIPR is approximately -1340% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 2% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIPR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -85. 5% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus -52. 6% for GIPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 64. 8x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 43. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADC: 9. 4% to $83. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 4. 0% for Agree Realty Corporation (ADC).
09Is GIPR or NTST or ADC or FCPT or NNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 4. 0% yield, +135. 6% 10Y return). Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +135. 6%, GIPR: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GIPR and NTST and ADC and FCPT and NNN?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GIPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.