Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $7.85B | $1.41B | $1.92B | $1.27B | $1.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $551M | $552M | $674M | $1.03B | $915M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-189M | $-5M | $-173M | $-95M | $131M |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 75.5% | 75.2% | 54.9% | 85.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.6% | -0.4% | -27.2% | -7.9% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 370.7x | — | — | 24.5x |
| Total Debt | $140M | $88M | $290M | $444M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $91M | $167M | $103M | $91M | $105M |
GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) | 100 | 344.2 | +244.2% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 58.1 | -41.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Tandem Diabetes Car… (TNDM) | 100 | 22.2 | -77.8% |
| Inspire Medical Sys… (INSP) | 100 | 55.9 | -44.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 457.1% 10Y total return vs ATRC's 95.1%
- 32.3% revenue growth vs TNDM's 7.9%
- +52.0% vs INSP's -70.9%
ATRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.03
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 3.96x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 3.96x
- Beta 1.03 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, TNDM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INSP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 179.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 14.3% margin vs GKOS's -34.3%
- 15.2% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -9.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.3% revenue growth vs TNDM's 7.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs GKOS's -34.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.0% vs INSP's -70.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -9.2% |
GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INSP leads in 3 of 6 categories
GKOS leads 1 • ATRC leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • TNDM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNDM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1.9x GKOS's $551M. INSP is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GKOS's -34.3%. On growth, GKOS holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $551M | $552M | $674M | $1.0B | $915M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$40M | $13M | -$165M | -$68M | $62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$189M | -$5M | -$173M | -$95M | $131M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $54M | -$48M | -$4M | $97M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +75.5% | +75.2% | +54.9% | +85.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.6% | -0.4% | -27.2% | -7.9% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.3% | -0.8% | -25.7% | -9.2% | +14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +9.7% | -7.1% | -0.4% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | +14.3% | +12.3% | +5.5% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +101.6% | -100.0% | +84.8% | -5.0% |
Valuation Metrics
INSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INSP's 19.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.9B | $1.4B | $1.9B | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $1.3B | $2.1B | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.90x | -115.83x | -13.80x | -6.08x | 9.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 370.67x | — | — | 24.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 77.75x | — | — | 19.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.47x | 2.63x | 2.92x | 1.25x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.69x | 2.70x | 5.51x | 8.01x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.15x | — | — | 16.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INSP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSP delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-68 for TNDM. INSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNDM's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSP scores 7/9 vs TNDM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -26.5% | -1.0% | -50.8% | -68.3% | +18.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.1% | -0.7% | -16.5% | -10.0% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.2% | -0.6% | -16.4% | -10.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.3% | -0.6% | -28.9% | -11.5% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.18x | 0.85x | 2.86x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49M | -$79M | $187M | $354M | -$73M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $91M | $167M | $103M | $91M | $105M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $140M | $88M | $290M | $444M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.69x | 0.47x | -96.80x | -15.99x | 418.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs INSP's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs INSP's -45.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | -29.2% | +28.3% | -14.3% | -50.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.0% | -8.3% | +1.1% | -17.0% | -70.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.7% | -41.8% | -75.7% | -44.8% | -83.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | -64.2% | -91.3% | -78.0% | -76.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +457.1% | +95.1% | +30.3% | -75.4% | +82.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.7% | -16.5% | -37.6% | -18.0% | -45.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GKOS and ATRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATRC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GKOS currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs INSP's 27.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.03x | 2.20x | 1.45x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $146.75 | $43.18 | $20.06 | $29.65 | $163.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.16 | $26.62 | $9.82 | $9.98 | $44.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +64.4% | +83.9% | +62.3% | +27.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 45.0 | 69.8 | 39.1 | 31.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 678K | 669K | 1.5M | 1.8M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GKOS as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", TNDM as "Buy", INSP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 100.4% upside for INSP (target: $91) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $146.67 | $50.67 | $33.50 | $31.62 | $91.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 19 | 15 | 39 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +13.3% |
INSP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GKOS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?
On forward P/E, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?
Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.
5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +457. 1% versus TNDM's -75. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 115% more volatile than ATRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.
3% versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. grew EPS 179. 4% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSP leads at 30. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 9% net margin versus -37. 0% for Glaukos Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSP leads at 5. 6% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSP leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 346. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSP: 100. 4% to $91. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
20), +457. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GKOS: +457. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GKOS and ATRC and NVCR and TNDM and INSP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TNDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.