Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.85B
5Y Perf.+244.2%
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-41.9%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-75.0%
TNDM
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.27B
5Y Perf.-77.8%
INSP
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.31B
5Y Perf.-44.1%

GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GKOS logoGKOS
ATRC logoATRC
NVCR logoNVCR
TNDM logoTNDM
INSP logoINSP
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - DevicesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$7.85B$1.41B$1.92B$1.27B$1.31B
Revenue (TTM)$551M$552M$674M$1.03B$915M
Net Income (TTM)$-189M$-5M$-173M$-95M$131M
Gross Margin78.1%75.5%75.2%54.9%85.8%
Operating Margin-15.6%-0.4%-27.2%-7.9%5.6%
Forward P/E370.7x24.5x
Total Debt$140M$88M$290M$444M$32M
Cash & Equiv.$91M$167M$103M$91M$105M

GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GKOS
ATRC
NVCR
TNDM
INSP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Glaukos Corporation (GKOS)100344.2+244.2%
AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC)10058.1-41.9%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10025.0-75.0%
Tandem Diabetes Car… (TNDM)10022.2-77.8%
Inspire Medical Sys… (INSP)10055.9-44.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INSP leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Glaukos Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ATRC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 457.1% 10Y total return vs ATRC's 95.1%
  • 32.3% revenue growth vs TNDM's 7.9%
  • +52.0% vs INSP's -70.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.
The Income Pick

ATRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.03
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 3.96x
  • Beta 1.03, current ratio 3.96x
  • Beta 1.03 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Healthcare Pick

NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
TNDM
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TNDM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
INSP
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

INSP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 179.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.8%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 14.3% margin vs GKOS's -34.3%
  • 15.2% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -9.2%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGKOS logoGKOS32.3% revenue growth vs TNDM's 7.9%
ValueINSP logoINSPBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINSP logoINSP14.3% margin vs GKOS's -34.3%
Stability / SafetyATRC logoATRCBeta 1.03 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GKOS logoGKOS+52.0% vs INSP's -70.9%
Efficiency (ROA)INSP logoINSP15.2% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -9.2%

GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GKOSGlaukos Corporation
FY 2019
Glaucoma
97.5%$231M
Corneal Health
2.5%$6M
ATRCAtriCure, Inc.
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$2M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

TNDMTandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
FY 2025
Supplies and Other
54.3%$551M
Pump
45.7%$464M
INSPInspire Medical Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Operating Segment
100.0%$912M

GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINSPLAGGINGTNDM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TNDM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1.9x GKOS's $551M. INSP is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GKOS's -34.3%. On growth, GKOS holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedTNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…INSP logoINSPInspire Medical S…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$551M$552M$674M$1.0B$915M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$40M$13M-$165M-$68M$62M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$189M-$5M-$173M-$95M$131M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M$54M-$48M-$4M$97M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.1%+75.5%+75.2%+54.9%+85.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.6%-0.4%-27.2%-7.9%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-34.3%-0.8%-25.7%-9.2%+14.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.4%+9.7%-7.1%-0.4%+10.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+41.2%+14.3%+12.3%+5.5%+1.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.3%+101.6%-100.0%+84.8%-5.0%
INSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

INSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, INSP's 19.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedTNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…INSP logoINSPInspire Medical S…
Market CapShares × price$7.9B$1.4B$1.9B$1.3B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.9B$1.3B$2.1B$1.6B$1.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-40.90x-115.83x-13.80x-6.08x9.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.370.67x24.46x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple77.75x19.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue15.47x2.63x2.92x1.25x1.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.69x2.70x5.51x8.01x1.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.15x16.73x
INSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INSP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

INSP delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-68 for TNDM. INSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNDM's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSP scores 7/9 vs TNDM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedTNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…INSP logoINSPInspire Medical S…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-26.5%-1.0%-50.8%-68.3%+18.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-20.1%-0.7%-16.5%-10.0%+15.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-9.2%-0.6%-16.4%-10.0%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-10.3%-0.6%-28.9%-11.5%+6.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935537
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x0.18x0.85x2.86x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$49M-$79M$187M$354M-$73M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$91M$167M$103M$91M$105M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$140M$88M$290M$444M$32M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-18.69x0.47x-96.80x-15.99x418.58x
INSP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs INSP's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs INSP's -45.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedTNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…INSP logoINSPInspire Medical S…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.2%-29.2%+28.3%-14.3%-50.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+52.0%-8.3%+1.1%-17.0%-70.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+128.7%-41.8%-75.7%-44.8%-83.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.5%-64.2%-91.3%-78.0%-76.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+457.1%+95.1%+30.3%-75.4%+82.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+31.7%-16.5%-37.6%-18.0%-45.6%
GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GKOS and ATRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ATRC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GKOS currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs INSP's 27.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedTNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…INSP logoINSPInspire Medical S…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.20x1.03x2.20x1.45x1.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$146.75$43.18$20.06$29.65$163.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$73.16$26.62$9.82$9.98$44.41
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.4%+64.4%+83.9%+62.3%+27.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.045.069.839.131.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded678K669K1.5M1.8M1.1M
Evenly matched — GKOS and ATRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GKOS as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", TNDM as "Buy", INSP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 100.4% upside for INSP (target: $91) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147).

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedTNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…INSP logoINSPInspire Medical S…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$146.67$50.67$33.50$31.62$91.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts2419153927
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.8%0.0%0.0%+13.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

INSP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GKOS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallInspire Medical Systems, In… (INSP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs TNDM vs INSP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?

On forward P/E, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 24. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?

Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.

5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +457. 1% versus TNDM's -75. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AtriCure, Inc.

(ATRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 115% more volatile than ATRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.

3% versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. grew EPS 179. 4% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSP leads at 30. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?

Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.

(INSP) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 9% net margin versus -37. 0% for Glaukos Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSP leads at 5. 6% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSP leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.

(INSP) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 346. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSP: 100. 4% to $91. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or TNDM or INSP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

20), +457. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GKOS: +457. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GKOS and ATRC and NVCR and TNDM and INSP?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TNDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GKOS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATRC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TNDM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GKOS and ATRC and NVCR and TNDM and INSP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GKOS: 41.2% · ATRC: 14.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.