Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $7.85B | $1.27B | $11.26B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $551M | $1.03B | $2.90B | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-189M | $-95M | $303M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 54.9% | 71.0% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.6% | -7.9% | 17.5% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $140M | $444M | $1.05B | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $91M | $91M | $716M | $103M |
GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) | 100 | 344.2 | +244.2% |
| Tandem Diabetes Car… (TNDM) | 100 | 22.2 | -77.8% |
| Insulet Corporation (PODD) | 100 | 85.1 | -14.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.3%, EPS growth -18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.5%
- 457.1% 10Y total return vs PODD's 439.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 21.3%, current ratio 4.69x
- Beta 1.20, current ratio 4.69x
TNDM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PODD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- beta 0.68
- 10.4% margin vs GKOS's -34.3%
- Beta 0.68 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
- 9.6% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 20.1% vs -9.2%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.3% revenue growth vs TNDM's 7.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs GKOS's -34.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.0% vs PODD's -39.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 20.1% vs -9.2% |
GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PODD leads in 2 of 6 categories
GKOS leads 1 • TNDM leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PODD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PODD is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 5.3x GKOS's $551M. PODD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GKOS's -34.3%. On growth, GKOS holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $551M | $1.0B | $2.9B | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$40M | -$68M | $582M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$189M | -$95M | $303M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$4M | $416M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +54.9% | +71.0% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.6% | -7.9% | +17.5% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.3% | -9.2% | +10.4% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -0.4% | +14.3% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | +5.5% | +33.9% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +84.8% | +160.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GKOS and TNDM and NVCR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.9B | $1.3B | $11.3B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $1.6B | $11.6B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.90x | -6.08x | 46.09x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.23x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 19.76x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.47x | 1.25x | 4.16x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.69x | 8.01x | 7.61x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 29.81x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PODD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PODD delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-68 for TNDM. GKOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNDM's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PODD scores 7/9 vs TNDM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -26.5% | -68.3% | +21.4% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.1% | -10.0% | +9.6% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.2% | -10.0% | +20.1% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.3% | -11.5% | +18.7% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 2.86x | 0.69x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49M | $354M | $335M | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $91M | $91M | $716M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $140M | $444M | $1.1B | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.69x | -15.99x | 7.39x | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs PODD's -39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | -14.3% | -43.3% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.0% | -17.0% | -39.3% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.7% | -44.8% | -49.7% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | -78.0% | -31.5% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +457.1% | -75.4% | +439.0% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.7% | -18.0% | -20.5% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GKOS and PODD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PODD is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GKOS currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs PODD's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.45x | 0.68x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $146.75 | $29.65 | $354.88 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.16 | $9.98 | $148.31 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +62.3% | +45.2% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 39.1 | 22.4 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 678K | 1.8M | 1.1M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GKOS as "Buy", TNDM as "Buy", PODD as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.3% upside for PODD (target: $339) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $146.67 | $31.62 | $339.00 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 39 | 50 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
PODD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GKOS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). Insulet Corporation (PODD) offers the better valuation at 46. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.
5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +457. 1% versus TNDM's -75. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 222% more volatile than PODD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.
3% versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NovoCure Limited grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PODD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?
Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
1% net margin versus -37. 0% for Glaukos Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PODD leads at 17. 5% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GKOS leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PODD: 111.
3% to $339. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), +439. 0% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PODD: +439. 0%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GKOS and TNDM and PODD and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TNDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PODD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.