Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.85B
5Y Perf.+244.2%
TNDM
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.27B
5Y Perf.-77.8%
PODD
Insulet Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.26B
5Y Perf.-14.9%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-75.0%

GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GKOS logoGKOS
TNDM logoTNDM
PODD logoPODD
NVCR logoNVCR
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$7.85B$1.27B$11.26B$1.92B
Revenue (TTM)$551M$1.03B$2.90B$674M
Net Income (TTM)$-189M$-95M$303M$-173M
Gross Margin78.1%54.9%71.0%75.2%
Operating Margin-15.6%-7.9%17.5%-27.2%
Forward P/E25.2x
Total Debt$140M$444M$1.05B$290M
Cash & Equiv.$91M$91M$716M$103M

GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GKOS
TNDM
PODD
NVCR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Glaukos Corporation (GKOS)100344.2+244.2%
Tandem Diabetes Car… (TNDM)10022.2-77.8%
Insulet Corporation (PODD)10085.1-14.9%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10025.0-75.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PODD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Glaukos Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation
The Growth Play

GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 32.3%, EPS growth -18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.5%
  • 457.1% 10Y total return vs PODD's 439.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 21.3%, current ratio 4.69x
  • Beta 1.20, current ratio 4.69x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TNDM
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

TNDM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PODD
Insulet Corporation
The Income Pick

PODD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • beta 0.68
  • 10.4% margin vs GKOS's -34.3%
  • Beta 0.68 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
  • 9.6% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 20.1% vs -9.2%
Best for: income & stability
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Secondary Option

NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGKOS logoGKOS32.3% revenue growth vs TNDM's 7.9%
Quality / MarginsPODD logoPODD10.4% margin vs GKOS's -34.3%
Stability / SafetyPODD logoPODDBeta 0.68 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GKOS logoGKOS+52.0% vs PODD's -39.3%
Efficiency (ROA)PODD logoPODD9.6% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 20.1% vs -9.2%

GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GKOSGlaukos Corporation
FY 2019
Glaucoma
97.5%$231M
Corneal Health
2.5%$6M
TNDMTandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
FY 2025
Supplies and Other
54.3%$551M
Pump
45.7%$464M
PODDInsulet Corporation
FY 2025
International Omnipod
98.7%$2.7B
Drug Delivery
1.3%$34M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPODDLAGGINGNVCR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PODD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PODD is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 5.3x GKOS's $551M. PODD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GKOS's -34.3%. On growth, GKOS holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
RevenueTrailing 12 months$551M$1.0B$2.9B$674M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$40M-$68M$582M-$165M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$189M-$95M$303M-$173M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M-$4M$416M-$48M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.1%+54.9%+71.0%+75.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.6%-7.9%+17.5%-27.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-34.3%-9.2%+10.4%-25.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.4%-0.4%+14.3%-7.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+41.2%+5.5%+33.9%+12.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.3%+84.8%+160.0%-100.0%
PODD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GKOS and TNDM and NVCR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
Market CapShares × price$7.9B$1.3B$11.3B$1.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.9B$1.6B$11.6B$2.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-40.90x-6.08x46.09x-13.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.45x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue15.47x1.25x4.16x2.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.69x8.01x7.61x5.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.81x
Evenly matched — GKOS and TNDM and NVCR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PODD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

PODD delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-68 for TNDM. GKOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNDM's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PODD scores 7/9 vs TNDM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-26.5%-68.3%+21.4%-50.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-20.1%-10.0%+9.6%-16.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-9.2%-10.0%+20.1%-16.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-10.3%-11.5%+18.7%-28.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93375
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x2.86x0.69x0.85x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$49M$354M$335M$187M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$91M$91M$716M$103M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$140M$444M$1.1B$290M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-18.69x-15.99x7.39x-96.80x
PODD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs PODD's -39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.2%-14.3%-43.3%+28.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+52.0%-17.0%-39.3%+1.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+128.7%-44.8%-49.7%-75.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.5%-78.0%-31.5%-91.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+457.1%-75.4%+439.0%+30.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+31.7%-18.0%-20.5%-37.6%
GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GKOS and PODD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PODD is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GKOS currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs PODD's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.20x1.45x0.68x2.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$146.75$29.65$354.88$20.06
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$73.16$9.98$148.31$9.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.4%+62.3%+45.2%+83.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.039.122.469.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded678K1.8M1.1M1.5M
Evenly matched — GKOS and PODD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GKOS as "Buy", TNDM as "Buy", PODD as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.3% upside for PODD (target: $339) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147).

MetricGKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$146.67$31.62$339.00$33.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts24395015
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.5%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PODD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GKOS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallInsulet Corporation (PODD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GKOS vs TNDM vs PODD vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). Insulet Corporation (PODD) offers the better valuation at 46. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?

Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.

5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +457. 1% versus TNDM's -75. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

68β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 222% more volatile than PODD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.

3% versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NovoCure Limited grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PODD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?

Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

1% net margin versus -37. 0% for Glaukos Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PODD leads at 17. 5% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GKOS leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PODD: 111.

3% to $339. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is GKOS or TNDM or PODD or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

68), +439. 0% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PODD: +439. 0%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between GKOS and TNDM and PODD and NVCR?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TNDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PODD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GKOS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TNDM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PODD

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GKOS and TNDM and PODD and NVCR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GKOS: 41.2% · TNDM: 5.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.