Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GLIBA vs LBRDA vs BATRK vs CHTR vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
GLIBA vs LBRDA vs BATRK vs CHTR vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $842M | $5.36B | $2.62B | $20.29B | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.05B | $261M | $732M | $54.64B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-309M | $-2.74B | $-23M | $5.13B | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 77.8% | 19.9% | 43.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -33.2% | 8.8% | 2.3% | 24.1% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | 3.2x | — | 3.8x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.15B | $1.75B | $837M | $97.12B | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $424M | $57M | $112M | $477M | $9.48B |
GLIBA vs LBRDA vs BATRK vs CHTR vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Liberty Broadband C… (LBRDA) | 100 | 27.7 | -72.3% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRK) | 100 | 233.2 | +133.2% |
| Charter Communicati… (CHTR) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLIBA vs LBRDA vs BATRK vs CHTR vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLIBA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LBRDA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
BATRK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 26.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- 222.7% 10Y total return vs CMCSA's 15.4%
- 10.5% revenue growth vs LBRDA's -100.0%
- +26.7% vs CHTR's -60.4%
CHTR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs CMCSA's 0.40
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.88x
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- 14.8% margin vs LBRDA's -10.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs LBRDA's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs LBRDA's -10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs BATRK's 0.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.7% vs CHTR's -60.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs LBRDA's -22.6%, ROIC 8.2% vs -0.3% |
GLIBA vs LBRDA vs BATRK vs CHTR vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLIBA vs LBRDA vs BATRK vs CHTR vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHTR leads in 1 of 6 categories
BATRK leads 1 • CMCSA leads 1 • GLIBA leads 0 • LBRDA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LBRDA and CHTR and CMCSA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 480.0x LBRDA's $261M. CMCSA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LBRDA's -10.5%. On growth, CMCSA holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $261M | $732M | $54.6B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$135M | -$3.7B | $92M | $20.9B | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$309M | -$2.7B | -$23M | $5.1B | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $303M | -$120M | $4.0B | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +77.8% | +19.9% | +43.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.2% | +8.8% | +2.3% | +24.1% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.5% | -10.5% | -3.2% | +9.4% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +116.1% | -16.4% | +7.4% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | -14.7% | -1.0% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -24.6% | -109.7% | +8.9% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GLIBA and CHTR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, CHTR trades at a 9% valuation discount to CMCSA's 4.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CHTR offers better value at 0.24x vs CMCSA's 0.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $842M | $5.4B | $2.6B | $20.3B | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $7.0B | $3.3B | $116.9B | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.72x | -1.99x | -138.32x | 4.43x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.53x | 3.20x | — | 3.80x | 7.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.24x | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.57x | — | 36.31x | 5.31x | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | — | 3.58x | 0.37x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.49x | 0.94x | 6.07x | 1.08x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.90x | — | — | 4.59x | 4.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR delivers a 25.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-36 for LBRDA. LBRDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHTR's 4.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHTR scores 7/9 vs LBRDA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.4% | -35.5% | -4.3% | +25.2% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.4% | -22.6% | -1.4% | +3.3% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | -0.3% | +1.0% | +8.6% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | -0.3% | +1.3% | +9.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.31x | 1.56x | 4.73x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $729M | $1.7B | $726M | $96.6B | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $424M | $57M | $112M | $477M | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.7B | $837M | $97.1B | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.96x | -28.58x | 0.48x | 2.48x | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BATRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BATRK five years ago would be worth $18,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,307 for LBRDA. Over the past 12 months, BATRK leads with a +26.7% total return vs CHTR's -60.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BATRK at 10.2% vs CHTR's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.3% | -23.1% | +28.4% | -23.4% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.4% | -59.6% | +26.7% | -60.4% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.4% | -53.2% | +34.0% | -54.3% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.4% | -76.9% | +85.0% | -76.9% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | -35.5% | +222.7% | -24.9% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.8% | -22.4% | +10.2% | -23.0% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BATRK and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BATRK's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BATRK currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs LBRDA's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.30x | 0.51x | 0.33x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.87 | $102.38 | $52.05 | $437.06 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.40 | $36.23 | $37.76 | $156.00 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +36.4% | +98.3% | +36.7% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 28.2 | 73.9 | 28.2 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 180K | 354K | 2.3M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LBRDA as "Buy", BATRK as "Buy", CHTR as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 323.6% upside for LBRDA (target: $158) vs -3.3% for BATRK (target: $50). CMCSA is the only dividend payer here at 5.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | $158.00 | $49.50 | $277.40 | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 5 | 55 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 0 | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +25.3% | +7.5% |
CHTR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). BATRK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
GLIBA vs LBRDA vs BATRK vs CHTR vs CMCSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA). Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Comcast Corporation at 4. 9x. On forward P/E, Liberty Broadband Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Charter Communications, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Comcast Corporation's 0. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) delivered a total return of +85. 0%, compared to -76. 9% for Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BATRK returned +222. 7% versus GLIBA's -50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 51β — meaning BATRK is approximately 145% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 5% for Charter Communications, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.
(BATRK) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -100. 0% for Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Comcast Corporation grew EPS 30. 2% year-over-year, compared to -407. 7% for Liberty Broadband Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BATRK leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus -1050. 2% for Liberty Broadband Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHTR leads at 24. 3% versus 2. 3% for BATRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LBRDA leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Comcast Corporation's 0. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) trades at 3. 2x forward P/E versus 7. 4x for Comcast Corporation — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LBRDA: 323. 6% to $158. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield) pays a dividend. GLIBA, LBRDA, BATRK, CHTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLIBA or LBRDA or BATRK or CHTR or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, GLIBA: -50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLIBA and LBRDA and BATRK and CHTR and CMCSA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLIBA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LBRDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BATRK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CMCSA pays a dividend while GLIBA, LBRDA, BATRK, CHTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.